Despite increasing acknowledgment of intimate partner violence (IPV) as a potentially traumatic experience, there is a gap in research investigating women’s perspectives of trauma related to their experiences of IPV from an intersectional lens. Intersectionality, which illuminates interconnected inequalities due to constructions of race, gender, sexuality, class, and culture, is particularly important for exploring the broader contexts of women’s experiences of IPV and trauma. In response to this dearth in research, this paper presents qualitative findings from a constructivist grounded theory study of 15 women’s experiences of IPV and trauma. To conceptualize IPV-related trauma from an intersectional lens, this study addressed the following research questions: (a) How do women who have experienced IPV understand and view trauma? (b) What do women who have experienced IPV indicate are experiences of trauma? and (c) How do women’s differing identities, experiences of oppression, or other hardships or adversities relate to their experiences of IPV? Through analysis, six distinct themes were identified: (a) changing perceptions of trauma; (b) the pain of trauma; (c) fear, anxiety, and triggers; (d) lasting impact of trauma; (e) struggle for acceptance; and (f) growth and insight. Implications from these findings illustrate the pervasiveness of IPV and other forms of trauma among women who have been abused by a partner, the long-lasting traumatic impacts of IPV, and the multiple experiences of being blamed and not believed that many women have experienced. These findings represent first steps in understanding the relationship between IPV and trauma from the perspectives of women who have survived IPV, offering an important contribution to previous knowledge on IPV. As well, this study provides first steps in understanding the interacting, intersectional effects of multiple forms of adversity, oppression, and IPV, and their relationships to trauma.
AlaggiaR.RegehrC.JenneyA. (2012). Risky business: An ecological analysis of intimate partner violence disclosure. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(3), 301-312.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
3.
BaumN. (2010). Shared traumatic reality in communal disasters: Toward a conceptualization. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 249-259.
4.
BeckJ. G.McNiffJ.ClappJ. D.OlsenS. A.AveryM. L.HagewoodJ. H. (2011). Exploring negative emotion in women experiencing intimate partner violence: Shame, guilt, and PTSD. Behavior Therapy, 42, 740-750.
5.
Becker-BleaseK.FreydJ. (2005). Beyond PTSD. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 403-411.
6.
BirkleyE. L.EckhardtC. I.DykstraR. E. (2016). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, intimate partner violence, and relationship functioning: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 29, 397-405.
7.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.. . . StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8.
BoassoA.OverstreetS.RuscherJ. B. (2015). Community disasters and shared trauma: Implications of listening to co-survivor narratives. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 20, 397-409.
9.
BogradM. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: Intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 275-289.
10.
Bonnan-WhiteJ.Hetzel-RigginM.Diamond-WelchB.TolliniC. (2015). “You blame me, therefore I blame me”: The importance of first disclosure partner responses on trauma-related cognitions and distress. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 1260-1286.
11.
BowenG. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12-23.
12.
BowlegL. (2008). When black lesbian woman ≠ black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312-325.
13.
BriereJ.ScottC. (2013). Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
14.
BurstowB. (2003). Toward a radical understanding of trauma and trauma work. Violence Against Women, 9, 1293-1317.
15.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CourtoisC. A.FordJ. D. (2013). Treatment of complex trauma: A sequenced, relationship based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
Couture-CarronA. (2016). One size doesn’t fit all: Dating abuse against women from the perspective of South Asian Muslim youth in Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3626-3647.
19.
CramerE. P.PlummerS. (2009). People of color with disabilities: Intersectionality as a framework for analyzing intimate partner violence in social, historical, and political contexts. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18, 162-181.
20.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
21.
DeJongheE. S.BogatG. A.LevendoskyA. A.von EyeA. (2008). Women survivors of intimate partner violence and post-traumatic stress disorder: Prediction and prevention. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 54, 294-300.
22.
DriskoJ. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 185-197.
EvansA.CoccomaP. (2014). Trauma-informed care: How neuroscience influences practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
Garcia-MorenoC.PallittoC.DevriesK.StocklH.WattsC.AbrahamsN. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
26.
GoodmanL. A.SullivanC. M.SerrataJ.PerillaJ.WilsonJ. M.FauciJ. E.DiGiovanniC. D. (2016). Development and validation of the trauma-informed practice scales. Journal of Community Psychology, 44, 747-764.
27.
HarrisM.FallotR. D. (2001). Using trauma theory to design service systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
HermanJ. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—From domestic abuse to political terror. New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
Hill CollinsP. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
JenneyA.AlaggiaR.NiepageM. (2016). ‘The lie is that it’s not going to get better’: Narratives of resilience from childhood exposure to Intimate Partner Violence. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Resilience, 4(1), 64–76.
31.
IversonK. M.ShenkC.FruzzettiA. E. (2009). Dialectical behavior therapy for women victims of domestic violence: A pilot study. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 242-248.
32.
JohnsonD. M.ZlotnickC.PerezS. (2008). The relative contribution of abuse severity and PTSD severity on the psychiatric and social morbidity of battered women in shelters. Behavior Therapy, 39, 232-241.
33.
JonesL.HughesM.UnterstallerU. (2001). Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in victims of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2, 99-119.
34.
KellyU. A. (2011). Theories of intimate partner violence: From blaming the victim to acting against injustice: Intersectionality as an analytic framework. Advances in Nursing Science, 34(3), E29-E51.
35.
KellyU. A. (2015). Trauma-informed mindfulness-based stress reduction: A promising new model for working with survivors of interpersonal violence. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 85, 194-219.
MacyR. J.FerronJ.CrosbyC. (2009). Partner violence and survivors’ chronic health problems: Informing social work practice. Social Work, 54, 29-43.
38.
MastrocinqueJ. M.ThewD.CerulliC.RaimondiC.PollardR. Q.Jr.ChinN. P. (2016). Deaf victims’ experiences with intimate partner violence: The need for integration and innovation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3753-3777.
39.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771-1800.
40.
OktayJ. (2012). Grounded theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
PillN.DayA.MildredH. (2017). Trauma responses to intimate partner violence: A review of current knowledge. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 178-184.
42.
PooleN.GreavesL. (2012). Introduction. In PooleN.GreavesL. (Eds.), Becoming trauma informed (pp. 14-22). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
ThiaraR. K.HagueG.MullenderA. (2011). Losing out on both counts: Disabled women and domestic violence. Disability & Society, 26, 757-771.
47.
TosoneC.LeeM.BialkinL.MartinezA.CampbellM.MartinezM. M.. . . StefanA. (2003). Shared trauma. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 10, 57-77.
48.
TrevillionK.OramS.FederG.HowardL. M. (2012). Experiences of domestic violence and mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 7, e51740.
49.
TserisE. J. (2013). Trauma theory without feminism? Evaluating contemporary understandings of traumatized women. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 28, 153-164.
50.
UlloaE. C.HammettJ. F.GuzmanM. L.HokodaA. (2015). Psychological growth in relation to intimate partner violence: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 88-94.
51.
WalkerJ. K. (2015). Investigating trans people’s vulnerabilities to intimate partner Violence/Abuse. Partner Abuse, 6, 107-125.
52.
WeberL.Parra-MedinaD. (2003). Intersectionality and women’s health: Charting a path to eliminating health disparities. Gender Perspectives on Health and Medicine, 7, 181-230.
