How do women describe their experiences of sexual violence in their intimate relationships? In answering this question, the present article builds upon a newly developed taxonomy of intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV). Women with past or present intimate partner violence experience (N = 28) were recruited from a domestic violence program and the community at large. Data were collected with semistructured, in-person interviews, audio recorded, and transcribed. As defined by the taxonomy, 27 women (96%) experienced intimate partner sexual abuse; 19 (68%) experienced intimate partner sexual coercion; 14 (50%) experienced intimate partner sexual assault; and two (7%) experienced intimate partner–forced sexual activity. Intimate partner sexual abuse was central to women’s experiences of IPSV. Common categories of sexual abuse were having sex outside of the relationship, controlling reproductive decisions, degrading with sexual criticism and insults, refusing communication, denying pleasure, and withholding sex. The types of IPSV did not typically occur in isolation; the taxonomy revealed a grouping pattern, with intimate partner sexual assault and intimate partner sexual coercion co-occurring with sexual abuse. Understanding the different types of IPSV as a comprehensive mechanism of sexual control is a meaningful way to conceptualize sexual violence in intimate relationships. The expanded taxonomy provides a useful therapeutic tool in helping women share and heal from these experiences.
American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist, 70, 832-864. doi:10.1037/a0039906
2.
Bagwell-GrayM. E. (2018). Women’s healing journey from intimate partner violence: Establishing positive sexuality. Qualitative Health Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049732318804302
3.
Bagwell-GrayM. E.MessingJ. T.Baldwin-WhiteA. (2015). Intimate partner sexual violence: A review of terms, definitions, and prevalence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16, 316-335. doi:10.1177/1524838014557290
4.
BasileK. C. (2008). Histories of violent victimization among women who reported unwanted sex in marriages and intimate relationships: Findings from a qualitative study. Violence Against Women, 14, 29-52. doi:10.11/1077801207311857
5.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.. . . StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6.
BroachJ. L.PetetricP. A. (2006). Beyond traditional definitions of assault: Expanding our focus to include sexually coercive experiences. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 477-486.
7.
ByingtonD. B.MartinP. Y.DiNittoD. M.MaxwellM. S. (1991). Organizational affiliation and effectiveness: The case of rape crisis centers. Administration in Social Work, 15, 83-103. doi:10.1300/J147v15n03_06
8.
CampbellJ. C.SoekenK. L. (1999). Forced sex and intimate partner violence: Effects on women’s risk and women’s health. Violence Against Women, 5, 1017-1035.
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Sexual violence prevention: Beginning the dialogue. Atlanta, GA: Author.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
12.
CurrieD. H.MacLeanB. D. (1997). Measuring violence against women: The interview as a gendered social encounter. In SchwartzM. D. (Ed.), Researching sexual violence: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 157-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
DeckerM. R.MillerE.McCauleyH. L.TancrediD. J.LevensonR. R.WaldmanJ.. . . SilvermanJ. G. (2011). Intimate partner violence and partner STI notification among adolescent and young adult family planning clinic patients. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 22, 345-347. doi:10.1258/ijsa.2011.010425
14.
DeGueS.DiLilloD. (2005). “You would if you loved me”: Toward an improved conceptual and etiological understanding of nonphysical male sexual coercion. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 513-532.
15.
DunkleK. L.DeckerM. R. (2013). Gender-based violence and HIV: Reviewing the evidence for links and causal pathways in the general population and high risk groups. American Journal of Epidemiology, 69, 20-26. doi:10.1111/aji.12039
16.
FosheeV.ReyesL.Agnew-BruneC.SimonT.VagiK.LeeR.SuchindranC. (2014). The effects of the evidence-based safe dates dating abuse prevention program on other youth violence outcomes. Prevention Science, 15, 907-916. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0472-4
17.
FryeV.El-BasselN.GilbertL.RajahV.ChristieN. (2001). Intimate partner sexual abuse among women on methadone. Violence and Victims, 16, 553-564.
18.
GolafshaniN. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8, 597-606.
19.
JohnsonM. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
20.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.. . . WhiteJ. (2006). The Sexual Experiences–Long Form Victimization (SES-LFV). Tucson: The University of Arizona.
21.
LivingstonJ. A.BuddieA. M.TestaM.VanZile-TamsenC. (2004). The role of sexual precedence in verbal sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 287-297.
22.
LoganT. K.ColeJ.ShannonL. A. (2007). A mixed-methods examination of sexual coercion and degradation among women in violent relationships who do and do not report forced sex. Violence and Victims, 22, 71-94.
23.
MacyR.GiattinaM.SangsterT. H.CrosbyC.MontijoN. J. (2009). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Inside the black box. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 359-373. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.06.002
24.
MacyR.MartinS.ObbonnyaI. N.RizoC. F. (2018). What do domestic violence and sexual assault service providers need to know about survivors to deliver services?Violence Against Women, 24, 28-44. doi:10.1177/1077801216671222
25.
MarshallL. (1992). Development of the severity of violence against women scales. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 103-121.
26.
McFarlaneJ.MalechaA.GistJ.WatsonK.BattenE.HallI.SmithS. (2005). Intimate partner sexual assault against women and associated victim substance use, suicidality, and risk factors for femicide. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 26, 953-967.
27.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.SniderC. (2017). Validation and adaptation of the danger assessment-5: A brief intimate partner violence risk assessment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73, 3220-3230. doi:10.1111/jan.13459
28.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.WilsonJ. S.BrownS.PatchellB. (2017). The lethality screen: The predictive validity of an intimate partner violence risk assessment for use by first responders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 205-226. doi:10.1177/0886260515585540
29.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
MillerE.McCawB.HumphreysB. L.MitchellC. (2015). Integrating intimate partner violence assessment and intervention into healthcare in the United States: A systems approach. Journal of Women’s Health, 24, 92-99. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4870
32.
O’SullivanE.CarletonA. (2001). Victim services, community outreach, and contemporary rape crisis centers: A comparison of independent and multiservice centers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 343-360. doi:10.1177/088626001016004005
33.
PitmanT. (2017). Living with coercive control: Trapped within a complex web of double standards, double binds and boundary violations. TheBritish Journal of Social Work, 47, 143-161. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw002
34.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2014). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 10).
35.
RajA.SantanaM. C.La MarcheA.AmaroH.CranstonK.SilvermanJ. G. (2006). Perpetration of intimate partner violence associated with sexual risk behaviors among young adult men. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1873-1878.
36.
RajA.SilvermanJ. G.AmaroH. (2004). Abused women report greater male partner risk and gender-based risk for HIV: Findings from a community-based study with Hispanic women. AIDS Care, 16, 519-529. doi:10.1080/09540120410001683448
37.
RussellD. E. H. (1982). Rape in marriage. New York, NY: Macmillan.
38.
SaldañaJ. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
SandelowskiM. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179-183.
40.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334-340.
41.
SandelowskiM. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33, 77-84.
42.
SandelowskiM.LeemanJ. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1404-1413. doi:10.1177/1049732312450368
43.
SantanaM. C.RajA.DeckerM. R.La MarcheA.SilvermanJ. G. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 575-585. doi:10.1007/s11524-006-9061-6
44.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
47.
WaltersM. L.ChenJ.BreidingM. J. (2013). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
