Body part removal (BPR) is a rare homicide phenomena, which emerges as a result of a variety of motives. Fifty-eight BPR U.K. homicide cases were analyzed. Findings indicated key characteristics within BPR murder offenses, with most offenders males; aged around 31 years; knew their victims; with presence of alcohol, drugs, and mental health issues; and more than two thirds of the sample had previous convictions, more than 50% for theft. Offense behaviors showed “multiple wounds” and “victim naked” as highest frequency, with the head as the most frequently removed body part. Smallest space analysis (SSA) identified two behavioral themes (expressive and instrumental) with 62.1% of cases classified as one of these. The study has provided the largest U.K. sample of BPR homicide, furthering understanding this type of offense and the offenders who commit it.
AlisonL.SmithM.EastmanO.RainbowL. (2003). Toulmin’s philosophy of argument and its relevance to offender profiling. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 173-183. doi:10.1080/1068316031000116265
2.
AlisonL.SnookB.SteinK. (2001). Unobtrusive measurement: Using police information for forensic research. Qualitative Research, 1, 241-254. doi:10.1177/146879410100100208
3.
AlmondL.AlisonL.PorterL. (2008). An evaluation and comparison of claims made in behavioural investigative advice reports compiled by the National Policing Improvements Agency in the United Kingdom. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4, 71-83.
4.
BhootraB.WeissE. (2006). Muti killing: A case report. Medicine, Science and the Law, 46, 255-259.
5.
BlandJ.AltmanD. (1995). Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. British Medical Journal, 310, Article 170. doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170
6.
BonnyE.AlmondL.WoolnoughP. (2016). Adult missing persons: Can an investigative framework be generated using behavioural themes?Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 13, 296-312. doi:10.1002/jip.1459
7.
BorgI.LingoesJ. (1987). Multidimensional similarity structure analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
8.
CampbellD.StanleyJ. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
CanterD.AlisonL. (2003). Converting evidence into data: The use of law enforcement archives as unobtrusive measurement. The Qualitative Report, 8, 151-176.
10.
CanterD.AlisonL.AlisonE.WentinkN. (2004). The organized/disorganized typology of serial murder: Myth or model?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 293-320. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.10.3.293
11.
CanterD.HeritageR. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offense behaviour: Developments in “offender profiling.”The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185-212. doi:10.1080/09585189008408469
12.
ColeT.BrownJ. (2013). Behavioural investigative advice: Assistance to investigative decision-making in difficult-to-detect murder. Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11, 191-220. doi:10.1002/jip.1396
13.
CoxJ. (2006). Dismemberment & mutilation murder: A thematic exploration (Unpublished undergraduate dissertation). University of Bath, Bath, UK.
14.
Di NunnoN.CostantinidesF.VaccaM.Di NunnoC. (2006). Dismemberment: A review of the literature and description of 3 cases. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 27, 307-312. doi:10.1097/01.paf.0000188170.55342.69
15.
FelsonR.SteadmanH. (1983). Situational factors in disputes leading to criminal violence. Criminology, 21, 59-74. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00251.x
16.
FeshbachS. (1964). The function of aggression and the regulation of aggressive drive. Psychological Review, 71, 257-272. doi:10.1037/h0043041
17.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: And sex and drugs and rock “n” roll (4th ed.). London, England: Sage.
18.
GuttmanL. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
19.
Häkkänen-NyholmH.Weizmann-HeneliusG.SaleniusS.LindbergN.Repo-TiihonenE. (2009). Homicides with mutilation of the victim’s body. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54, 933-937. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01094.x
20.
KonopkaT.StronaM.BolechalaF.KunzJ. (2007). Corpse dismemberment in the material collected by the Department of Forensic Medicine, Cracow, Poland. Legal Medicine, 9(1), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2006.08.008
21.
LastS.FritzonK. (2005). Investigating the nature of expressiveness in stranger, acquaintance and intrafamilial homicides. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 179-193. doi:10.1002/jip.36
22.
LingoesJ. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes non-metric program series (Published master’s thesis). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
23.
Office for National Statistics. (2016). Compendium: Homicide. Retrieved from www.ons.gov.uk
24.
RajsJ.LundstromM.BrobergM.LidbergL.LindquistO. (1998). Criminal mutilation of the human body in Sweden—A thirty-year medico-legal and forensic psychiatric study. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43, 563-580. doi:10.1520/JFS16183J
25.
ResslerR.BurgessA.HartmanC.DouglasJ.McCormackA. (1986). Murderers who rape and mutilate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 273-287.
26.
ReuhlJ.BratzkeH. (1999). Death caused by a chain saw—Homicide, suicide or accident? A case report with a literature review (with 11 illustrations). Forensic Science International, 105, 45-59. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00096-1
27.
RosnowR.RosenthalR. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276
28.
SalfatiC. (2000). The nature of expressive and instrumentality in homicide: Implications for offender profiling. Homicide Studies, 4, 265-293. doi:10.1177/1088767900004003004
29.
SalfatiC. (2003). Offender interaction with victims in homicide: A multidimensional analysis of frequencies in crime scene behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 490-512. doi:10.1177/0886260503251069
30.
SalfatiC.BatemanA. (2005). Serial homicide: An investigation of behavioural consistency. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 121-144. doi:10.1002/jip.27
31.
SalfatiC.CanterD. (1999). Differentiating stranger murders: Profiling offender characteristics from behavioral styles. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 391-406. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199907/09)17:33.0.CO;2-Z
32.
SalfatiC.DupontF. (2006). Canadian homicide: An investigation of crime-scene actions. Homicide Studies, 10, 118-139. doi:10.1177/1088767906288449
33.
SalfatiC.HaratsisE. (2001). Greek homicide: A behavioral examination of offender crime-scene actions. Homicide Studies, 5, 335-362. doi:10.1177/1088767901005004006
34.
SalfatiC.TaylorP. (2006). Differentiating sexual violence: A comparison of sexual homicide and rape. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 107-125. doi:10.1080/10683160500036871
35.
SanttilaP.CanterD.ElfgrenT.HäkkänenH. (2001). The structure of crime- scene actions in Finnish homicides. Homicide Studies, 5, 363-387. doi:10.1177/1088767901005004007
36.
SanttilaP.HäkkänenH.CanterD.ElfgrenT. (2003). Classifying homicide offenders and predicting their characteristics from crime scene behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 107-118. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00328
SteynM. (2005). Muti murders form South Africa: A case report. Forensic Science International, 151, 279-287. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.05.022
39.
ThijssenJ.de RuiterC. (2011). Instrumental and expressive violence in Belgian homicide perpetrators. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 58-73. doi:10.1002/jip.130
40.
TürkE.PüschelK.TsokosM. (2004). Features characteristic of homicide in cases of complete decapitation. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 25, 83-86. doi:10.1097/01.paf.0000113921.06940.1d
