Developing and Validating an Experience Sampling Measure of Aggression: The Aggression-ES Scale

Abstract

Experience sampling methodologies are likely to play an important role in advancing our understanding of momentary influences on aggression, including short-term antecedent psychological states and situations. In this study, we evaluate whether a newly developed experiencing sampling measure of aggression, the Aggression Experience Sampler (Aggression-ES), provides a valid and reliable measure of aggression in experience sampling contexts. Participants were a convenience sample of 23 young adults recruited from the local University community. Data were collected using an experience sampling smartphone application over 8 days. They were analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. Our results support the within- and between-person reliability and the criterion validity of the Aggression-ES. The Aggression-ES represents a good choice of measure for use in experience sampling studies of aggression. Further work in other samples will help to provide further validity evidence for the measure.

Keywords

aggression violence experience sampling psychometric measurement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

C. A.

Bushman

B. J.

(2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.

Bakker

Kazantzis

Rickwood

Rickard

(2016). Mental health smartphone apps: Review and evidence-based recommendations for future developments. JMIR Mental Health, 3, e7.

Bolger

Laurenceau

J. P.

(2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Carlson

E. B.

Field

N. P.

Ruzek

J. I.

Bryant

R. A.

Dalenberg

C. J.

Keane

T. M.

Spain

D. A.

(2016). Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life. Quality of Life Research, 25, 507-516.

Comrey

A. L.

Lee

H. B.

(1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Crawford

J. R.

Henry

J. D.

(2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245-265.

Deloitte. (2017). State of the smart consumer and business usage patterns Global Mobile Consumer Survey 2017: UK Cut. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/mobile-consumer-survey.html

DeWall

C. N.

Lambert

N. M.

Pond

R. S.

Kashdan

T. B.

Fincham

F. D.

(2012). A grateful heart is a nonviolent heart cross-sectional, experience sampling, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 232-240.

Dimeff

L. A.

Baer

J. S.

Kivlahan

D. R.

Marlatt

(1999). Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A harm reduction approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

10.

Edmondson

Shaffer

J. A.

Chaplin

W. F.

Burg

M. M.

Stone

A. A.

Schwartz

J. E.

(2013). Trait anxiety and trait anger measured by ecological momentary assessment and their correspondence with traditional trait questionnaires. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 843-852.

11.

Finkel

E. J.

DeWall

C. N.

Slotter

E. B.

McNulty

J. K.

Pond

R. S.

Jr. Atkins

D. C.

(2012). Using I³ theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 533-549.

12.

Fishbach

Hofmann

(2015). Nudging self-control: A smartphone intervention of temptation anticipation and goal resolution improves everyday goal progress. Motivation Science, 1, 137-150.

13.

Geldhof

G. J.

Preacher

K. J.

Zyphur

M. J.

(2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19, 72-91.

14.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

15.

Granic

Patterson

G. R.

(2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113, 101-131.

16.

Hofmann

Patel

P. V.

(2015). SurveySignal: A convenient solution for experience sampling research using participants’ own smartphones. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 235-253.

17.

Juslin

P. N.

Västfjäll

(2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559-575.

18.

Kashdan

T. B.

DeWall

C. N.

Pond

R. S.

Silvia

P. J.

Lambert

N. M.

Fincham

F. D.

. . . Keller

P. S.

(2013). Curiosity protects against interpersonal aggression: Cross-sectional, daily process, and behavioral evidence. Journal of Personality, 81, 87-102.

19.

Kramer

Simons

C. J.

Hartmann

J. A.

Menne-Lothmann

Viechtbauer

Peeters

. . . Os

(2014). A therapeutic application of the experience sampling method in the treatment of depression: A randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry, 13, 68-77.

20.

Lim

Ilies

Koopman

Christoforou

Arvey

R. D.

(2016). Emotional mechanisms linking incivility at work to aggression and withdrawal at home: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Management, 44, 2888-2908.

21.

Mejía

Hooker

Ram

Pham

Metoyer

(2014). Capturing intraindividual variation and covariation constructs: Using multiple time-scales to assess construct reliability and construct stability. Research in Human Development, 11, 91-107.

22.

Moskowitz

D. S.

Young

S. N.

(2006). Ecological momentary assessment: What it is and why it is a method of the future in clinical psychopharmacology. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 31, 13-20.

23.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2012). Mplus Version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.

24.

Myin-Germeys

Oorschot

Collip

Lataster

Delespaul

van Os

. (2009). Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box of daily life. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1533-1547.

25.

Rainie

Zickuhr

(2015, August 26). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/

26.

Ramirez

J. M.

Andreu

J. M.

(2006). Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity) some comments from a research project. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 276-291.

27.

Rhemtulla

Brosseau-Liard

P. É.

Savalei

(2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373.

28.

Shiffman

(2009). Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in studies of substance use. Psychological Assessment, 21, 486-497.

29.

Solymosi

Bowers

Fujiyama

(2015). Mapping fear of crime as a context-dependent everyday experience that varies in space and time. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 193-211.

30.

Telford

McCarthy-Jones

Corcoran

Rowse

(2012). Experience sampling methodology studies of depression: The state of the art. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1119-1129.

31.

Thai

Page-Gould

(2018). ExperienceSampler: An open-source scaffold for building experience sampling smartphone, apps. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 729-739. doi:10.1037/met0000151

32.

Torous

Friedman

Keshavan

(2014). Smartphone ownership and interest in mobile applications to monitor symptoms of mental health conditions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2, e2.

33.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

(1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Retrieved from https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=psychology_pubs

34.

Wikström

P. O. H.

Treiber

K. H.

(2009). Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3, 75-96.

35.

Wrzus

Roberts

B. W.

(2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253-277.