The Perceptions of Sexual Assault Prevention According to Military Spouses

Abstract

Military spouses are at an increased vulnerability with regard to the potential of being sexually victimized. They are twice as likely as their civilian counterparts to experience sexual victimization. Despite the increased probability of sexual assault, not all military spouses perceive sexual assault and its prevention through the same lens. Recognizing that reality is subjective, the theoretical framework for this study was a constructivist paradigm. A qualitative case study was executed for the purpose of querying the perceptions of military spouses as it relates to sexual assault, its prevalence, and its prevention. The study employed the use of a web-based questionnaire consisting of 11 open-ended questions that included two scenario-based questions designed to explore perceptions of sexual assault, the need for a military spouse prevention program, and the catalyst for bystander intervention. Questionnaire results from 29 anonymous military wives whose husbands were affiliated with four out of the five branches of service were analyzed to gauge their perceptions specific to sexual assault and its prevention. The analysis of their responses resulted in the emergence of five themes related to sexual assault prevention that include the notion that military spouses view themselves as a vulnerable population for sexual victimization and its prevalence although little discussion is given to the topic. Results also indicated that a military spouse–targeted sexual assault prevention program is needed to familiarize military spouses with definitions of sexual assault and consent, reporting options, and victims’ rights. The study also found that the majority of military spouses are not familiar with the resources and services available to victims of sexual assault. The overarching implication is that a prevention program for military spouses is needed to familiarize them with reporting options and services as well as mitigate occurrences of sexual assault through training and education.

Keywords

sexual assault military spouse bystander intervention sexual assault prevention constructivist paradigm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Ryan

G. W.

(2014). Prevalence of sexual violence against women in 23 states and two U.S. territories, BRFSS 2005. Violence Against Women, 20, 485-499.

Black

M. C.

Merrick

M. T.

(2013). Prevalence of intimate partner violence, stalking, and sexual violence among active duty women and wives of active duty men—Comparisons with women in the U.S. general population, 2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Campbell

Wasco

S. M.

(2005). Understanding rape and sexual assault: 20 years of progress and future directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 127-131.

Centers for Disease Control (2018). Sexual assault prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/features/sexualviolence/index.html

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.

Dalton

(2004). The sexual assault crisis in the United States Air Force Academy. Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 11, 177-190.

DeGue

(2014). Preventing sexual violence on college campuses: Lessons from research and practice. Retrieved from https://www.notalone.gov/assets/evidence-based-strategies-for-the-prevention-of-sv-perpetration.pdf

DeGue

Valle

L. A.

Holt

M. K.

Massetti

G. M.

Matjasko

J. L.

Tharp

A. T.

(2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 346-362.

Farris

Schell

T. L.

Tanielian

(2013). Physical and psychological health following military sexual assault: Recommendations for care, research, and policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

10.

Franklin

C. A.

(2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-control and alcohol-induced sexual assault victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 263-285.

11.

Franklin

C. A.

Menaker

T. A.

(2014). Knowledge of campus and community sexual assault resources among students. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tasha_Menaker/publication/269709213_Knowledge_of_Campus_and_Community_Sexual_Assault_Resources_Among_Students/links/54947e7a0cf2ec1337578180.pdf

12.

Gillibrand

(2015). Snapshot Review of sexual assault report files at the four largest U.S. military bases in 2013. Retrieved from https://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Gillibrand_Sexual%20Assault%20Report.pdf

13.

Gleick

(1996, November). Scandal in the military. Time, 148, 28-31.

14.

Hayes-Smith

R. M.

Levett

L. M.

(2010). Student perceptions of sexual assault resources and prevalence of rape myth attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 5, 335-354.

15.

Hesse-Biber

S. N.

Leavy

(2010). The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

McMahon

Allen

C. T.

Postmus

J. L.

McMahon

S. M.

Peterson

N. A.

Lowe Hoffman

(2014). Measuring bystander attitudes and behavior to prevent sexual violence. Journal of American College Health, 62, 58-66.

17.

McMahon

Banyard

V. L.

(2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 1-14. doi:10.1177/1524838011426015

18.

McMichael

W. H.

(1997). The mother of all hooks: The story of the U.S. Navy’s Tailhook scandal. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

19.

National Sexual Violence Resource Center. (2016). The impact of sexual violence. Retrieved from https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/2016-01/saam_2016_impact-of-sexual-violence.pdf

20.

Potter

S. J.

Stapleton

J. G.

(2012). Translating sexual assault prevention from a college campus to a United States military installation: Piloting the know-your-power bystander social marketing campaign. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1593-1621.

21.

Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. (2018). Victims of sexual violence: Statistics. Retrieved from https://rainn.org

22.

Testa

Livingston

J. A.

VanZile-Tamsen

(2011). Advancing the study of violence against women using mixed methods: Integrating qualitative methods into a quantitative research program. Violence Against Women, 17, 236-250.

23.

Turchik

J. A.

Wilson

S. M.

(2010). Sexual assault in the U.S. military: A review of the literature and recommendations for the future. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 267-277.

24.

U.S. Department of Defense. (2013). Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) program procedures (DOD Directive No. 6495.02). Retrieved from http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/649502p.pdf

25.

U.S. Department of Defense. (2014). Fiscal Year 2013 annual report on sexual assault in the military. Retrieved from http://sapr.mil/public/docs/reports/FY13_DoD_SAPRO_Annual_Report_on_Sexual_Assault.pdf

26.

Vukotich

(2013). Military sexual assault prevention and response: The bystander intervention training approach. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 17, 19-34.

27.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.