While just over one in three heterosexual women will experience intimate partner violence (IPV) in her lifetime, 61% of bisexual women and 78% of non-monosexual women will. Combining previous research and theories on power, social resources, binegativity, and gender-based violence, this article analyzes the role of power and inequality in non-monosexual women’s IPV victimization. Using data from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, this article first examines rates of IPV victimization for statistically significant differences between monosexual (e.g., only have dating, romantic, and sexual partners of one sex/gender) and non-monosexual (e.g., have dating, romantic, and sexual partners of multiple sexes/genders) women in the United States and, second, introduces theoretically important variables to logistic regression analyses to determine the correlates of IPV victimization among non-monosexual women (age, race ethnicity, income, education, immigration status, and indigeneity; partner gender; sexual identity). Findings indicate that non-monosexual women are more likely to experience sexual, emotional, and psychological/control violence, and intimate stalking, but have an equivalent risk of experiencing physical violence. Moreover, having an abusive partner who is a man, having a lot of relative social power, and self-identifying as “bisexual” are all significant factors in violence victimization. Importantly, this is the first study using nationally representative data that confirms non-monosexual women are particularly at risk for sexual identity-based violence at the hands of their male/man partners, suggesting binegativity and biphobia may indeed be linked to hegemonic masculinity. Suggestions for moving research forward include improving data collection efforts such that we can disentangle gender from sex and individual aggregate power from relationship inequalities, as well as more adequately account for the timing of sexual identity disclosures within relationships, relative to the timing of violent episodes.
AgrestiA. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
2.
AhmedS. (2004). Shame before others. In AhmedS. (Ed.), The cultural politics of emotion (pp. 101-120). London, England: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
AizerA. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. The American Economic Review, 100, 1847-1859.
4.
BaileyJ.KimP.HillsA.LinsenmeierJ. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960-973.
5.
BalsamK. F.MohrJ. J. (2007). Adaptation to sexual orientation stigma: A comparison of bisexual and lesbian/gay adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 306-319.
6.
BellD. (1994). Bisexuality: A place on the margins. In WhittleS. (Ed.), The margins of the city: Gay men’s urban lives (pp. 129-141). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
7.
BergenR. (1998). Issues in intimate violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
BhattR. V. (1998). Domestic violence and substance abuse. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 63(Suppl. 1), S32-S31.
9.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.. . . StevensM. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
10.
BoehmerU. (2002). Twenty years of public health research: Inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1125-1130.
11.
BogradM. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In YllöK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
BradfordJ.RyanC.RothblumE. D. (1994). National Lesbian Health Care Survey: Implications for mental health care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 228-242.
13.
BradfordM. (2004). The bisexual experience: Living in a dichotomous culture. Journal of Bisexuality, 4, 7-23.
14.
BrowneA. (1987). When battered women kill. New York, NY: The Free Press.
15.
ByrneD. (1996). Clinical models for the treatment of gay male perpetrators of domestic violence. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 4, 107-116.
16.
ColemanV. E. (1994). Lesbian battering: The relationship between personality and the perpetration of violence. Violence and Victims, 9, 139-152.
17.
ComstockG. D. (1991). Violence against lesbians and gay men. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
18.
CopenS. E.ChandraA.Febo-VazquezI. (2016). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual orientation among adults aged 18-44 in the United States: Data from the 2011-2013 National Survey of Family Growth (National Health Statistics Report, No. 88). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
19.
CostonB. M. (2011). Issues in intimate violence: Heterosexism and exclusion. In BallM.ScherrerB. (Eds.), Queering paradigms II (pp. 295-312). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
20.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York, NY: The Free Press.
21.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
23.
DyarC.FeinsteinB. A.LondonB. (2014). Dimensions of sexual identity and minority stress among bisexual women: The role of partner gender. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1, 441-451.
24.
DyarC.FeinsteinB. A.LondonB. (2015). Mediators of differences between lesbians and bisexual women in sexual identity and minority stress. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2, 43-51.
25.
Erickson-SchrothL.MitchellJ. (2009). Queering queer theory, or why bisexuality matters. Journal of Bisexuality, 9, 297-315.
26.
FadermanL. (1992). The return of butch and femme: A phenomenon in lesbian sexuality of the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 2, 578-596.
27.
FollingstadD. R. (2007). Rethinking current approaches to psychological abuse: Conceptual and methodological issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 439-458.
28.
FontesL. A. (2015). Invisible chains: Overcoming coercive control in your intimate relationship. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
29.
GoldenC. (1987). Diversity and variability in women’s sexual identities. In Boston Lesbian Psychologies Collective (Ed.), Lesbian psychologies: Explorations and challenges (pp. 19-34). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
30.
GoodeW. J. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, 624-636.
31.
HabermanS. J. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29, 205-220. doi:10.2307/2529686
32.
HarrisA. P. (2000). Gender, violence, race, and criminal justice. Stanford Law Review, 52, 777-807.
33.
HassounehD.GlassN. (2008). The influence of gender role stereotyping on women’s experiences of female same-sex intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 310-325.
34.
HastingsJ. E.HambergerL. K. (1988). Personality characteristics of spouse abusers: A controlled comparison. Violence and Victims, 3, 31-48.
35.
HeadS.MiltonM. (2014). Filling the silence: Exploring the bisexual experience of intimate partner abuse. Journal of Bisexuality, 14, 277-299.
36.
HerekG. M. (Ed.). (1997). Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men and bisexuals (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
HerekG. M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264-274.
38.
HotalingG. T.SugarmanD. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 1101-1124.
39.
IsraelT.MohrJ. J. (2004). Attitudes toward bisexual women and men: Current research, future directions. Journal of Bisexuality, 4, 117-134.
40.
KantorG. KJasinskiJ. L. (1998). Dynamics and risk factors in partner violence. In JasinskiJ. L.WilliamsL. M. (Ed.), Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research (pp. 1-43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
KeillerS. W. (2010). Masculine norms as correlates of heterosexual men’s attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 38-52.
42.
KlesseC. (2011). Shady characters, untrustworthy partners, and promiscuous sluts: Creating bisexual intimacies in the face of heteronormativity and biphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 11, 227-244.
43.
KlesseC. (2016). The spectre of promiscuity: Gay male and bisexual non-monogamies and polyamories. London, England: Routledge.
44.
KohA. S.RossL. K. (2006). Mental health issues: A comparison of lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual women. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 33-57.
45.
KurzD. (1993). Physical assaults by husbands: A major social problem. InGellesR. J.LosekeD. R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 88-103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
LandoltM.DuttonD. (1997). Power and personality: An analysis of gay male intimate abuse. Sex Roles, 37, 335-359.
47.
LehmanM. (1997). At the end of the rainbow: A report on gay male domestic violence and abuse. Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse.
48.
LentonR. (1995). Power versus feminist theories of wife abuse. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 305-330.
49.
LetellierP. (1994). Gay and bisexual male domestic violence victimization: Challenges to feminist theory and responses to violence. Violence and Victims, 9, 95-106.
50.
MahalikJ. R.LockeB. D.LudlowL. H.DiemerM. A.ScottR. P.GottfriedM.. . . FreitasG. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 3-25.
51.
MarshallL. L.RoseP. (1990). Premarital violence: The impact of family of origin violence, stress, and reciprocity. Violence and Victims, 5, 51-64.
52.
MartinD. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco, CA: Glide Publications.
53.
McClennenJ. (2010). Social work and family violence: Theories, assessment, and intervention. New York, NY: Springer.
54.
MelzerS. A. (2002). Gender, work, and intimate violence: Men’s occupational violence spillover and compensatory violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 820-833.
55.
MillerD. H.GreeneK.CausbyV.WhiteB. W.LockhartL. L. (2001). Domestic violence in lesbian relationships. Women & Therapy, 23, 107-127.
56.
MohrJ. J.RochlenA. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353-369.
57.
MulickP. S.WrightL. W.Jr. (2002). Examining the existence of biphobia in the heterosexual and homosexual populations. Journal of Bisexuality, 2(4), 45-64.
58.
MuntS. R. (1995). The lesbian flaneur. In BellD.ValentineG. (Eds.), Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities (pp. 114-125). London, England: Routledge.
59.
PachankisJ. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 328-345.
60.
PataiD. (1998). Heterophobia: Sexual harassment and the future of feminism. Lantham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
61.
PeplauL. A.GarnetsL. D. (2000). A new paradigm for understanding women’s sexuality and sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 330-350.
62.
PeplauL. A.GarnetsL. D.SpaldingL. R.ConleyT. D.VeniegasR. C. (1998). A critique of Bem’s “Exotic Becomes Erotic” theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103, 387-394.
63.
PoormanP. B.SeelauE. P.SeelauS. M. (2003). Perceptions of domestic abuse in same-sex relationships and implications for criminal justice and mental health responses. Violence and Victims, 18, 659-669.
64.
QuinnD. M. (2006). Concealable versus conspicuous stigmatized identities. In LevinS.van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 83–103). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65.
QuinnD. M.ChaudoirS. R. (2009). Living with a concealable stigmatized identity: The impact of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, and cultural stigma on psychological distress and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 634-651.
66.
RandC.GrahamD. L.RawlingsE. I. (1982). Psychological health and factors the court seeks to control in lesbian mother custody trials. Journal of Homosexuality, 8, 27-39.
67.
ReinischJ.SandersS. A.Ziemba-DavisM. (1990, September27-29). Self-labeled sexual orientation, sexual behavior, and knowledge about AIDS: Implications for biomedical research and education programs. In National Institute of Mental Health (Ed.), Proceedings of the NIMH/NIDA Workshop on Women and AIDS: Promoting Health Behaviors (Vol. 19878, pp. 208-223). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
68.
ReiterL. (1989). Sexual orientation, sexual identity, and the question of choice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 17, 138-150.
69.
RenzettiC. M.MileyC. H. (1996). Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships. New York, NY: Routledge.
70.
RistockJ. (2003). Exploring dynamics of abusive lesbian relationships: Preliminary analysis of a multisite, qualitative study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 329-341.
71.
Rodriguez RustP. C. (2000). Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
SchelongK. M. (1994). Domestic violence and the state: Response to and rationales for spousal battering, marital rape and stalking. Marquette Law Review, 78, 79-120.
74.
StarkE. (2009). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
75.
SteinmetzS. K.StrausM. A. (1974). Violence in the family. Oxford, UK: Dodd, Mead.
76.
TaubJ. (1999). Bisexual women and beauty norms: A qualitative examination. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 3(4), 27-36.
77.
ThompsonC. A. (1992). Lesbian grief and loss issues in the coming out process. Women & Therapy, 12, 175-185.
78.
VanNattaM. (2005). Constructing the battered woman. Feminist Studies, 31, 416-443.
79.
WalkerL. E. (1980). The battered woman. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
80.
YllöK. E. (1994). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In GellesR. J.LosekeD. R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
81.
YllöK. E.BogradM. E. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
