Evaluating violence against women (VAW) training is essential to moving the field forward with proven approaches that can improve service provision for survivors of violence. Given existing resource constraints involved in VAW work, online training represents an economical and flexible option; however, existing evaluations of online programs in the VAW field are scant and face a variety of limitations. This study aimed to fill this gap by using a pre-/posttest design, comparison group, and mixed-method analysis to assess the effectiveness and value of an online training program. The program was intended to provide foundational knowledge in feminist antiviolence principles and values to a range of individuals working with survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). Program participants (N = 108) included volunteers, students, and professionals from various sectors, allowing for the application of the results to a broader field of VAW support services. This is important as individuals who work with IPV survivors may do so in a range of settings outside of the shelter context. Results demonstrate the potential for online VAW training to improve participants’ knowledge of and attitudes about VAW, which can positively inform their work with survivors. Qualitative responses provide further insight into course impact and highlight positive and negative aspects of the course. Although preliminary, these results provide justification for continued development and evaluation of online VAW training programs.
ArcherT. (2008). Response rates to expect from web-based surveys and what to do about it. Journal of Extension, 46(3), 1.
2.
Bennett-LevyJ.PerryH. (2009). The promise of online cognitive behavioural therapy training for rural and remote mental health professionals. Australasian Psychiatry, 17(Suppl. 1), S121-S124.
3.
BogradM. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: Intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 25, 275-289. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb00248.x
4.
BrollR.CrooksC.BakerL.StraatmanA.-L. (2012). Evaluating violence against women training initiatives: A primer. London, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women & Children.
5.
Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women & Children. (2011). Knowledge exchange workshop on domestic violence training, June 16-17, 2011: Report of the meeting. London, Ontario, Canada: Author.
6.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139-168.
7.
DanisF. S. (2016). Teaching domestic violence online: A step forward or a step backward?Violence Against Women, 22, 1476-1483.
8.
DevineA.SpencerA.EldridgeS.NormanR.FederG. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS), a domestic violence training and support programme for primary care: A modelling study based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 2, e001008-e001008.
9.
EtheringtonC.BakerL. (2016). Gender-based violence training programs: Online, face-to-face and blended formats. London, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women & Children.
10.
Garcia-MorenoC.WattsC. (2011). Violence against women: An urgent public health priority. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89, 2.
11.
GramckowH. P.Nady SigmonJ.GabouryM. T.BurtM. R. (1997). Measuring the impact of training. In BurtM. R.HarrellA. V.NewmarkL. C.AronL. Y.JacobsL. K. (Eds.), Evaluation guidebook for projects funded by S.T.O.P. formula grants under the Violence Against Women Act (pp. 201-220). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
12.
HarrisJ. M.KutobR. M.SurprenantZ. J.MaiuroR. D.DelateT. A. (2002). Can internet-based education improve physician confidence in dealing with domestic violence?Family Medicine, 34, 287-292.
13.
HeckN. C.SaundersB. E.SmithD. W. (2015). Web-based training for an evidence-supported treatment: Training completion and knowledge acquisition in a global sample of learners. Child Maltreatment, 20, 183-192.
14.
HiltonN. Z.HamE. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of electronic training in domestic violence risk assessment: ODARA 101. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1065-1073.
15.
KahanB. (2008). Review of evaluation frameworks. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Ministry of Education.
16.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1996). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
17.
LongL. K.DuBoisC. Z.FaleyR. H. (2008). Online training: The value of capturing trainee reactions. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20, 21-37.
18.
LongL. K.DuBoisC. Z.FaleyR. H. (2009). A case study analysis of factors that influence attrition rates in voluntary online training programs. International Journal on E-learning, 8, 347-359.
19.
PattersonD.ReskoS. M. (2015). Is online learning a viable training option for teaching sexual assault forensic examiners?Journal of Forensic Nursing, 11, 181-189.
RamsayJ.RutterfordC.GregoryA.DunneD.EldridgeS.SharpD.FederG. (2012). Domestic violence: Knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary healthcare clinicians. British Journal of General Practice, 62 (602), e647-e655.
22.
RasmussenL. A.HughesM. J.MurrayC. A. (2008). Applying motivational interviewing in a domestic violence shelter: A pilot study evaluating the training of shelter staff. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 17, 296-317.
23.
SargentK. S.McDonaldR.VuN. L.JourilesE. N. (2016). Evaluating an online program to help children exposed to domestic violence: Results of two randomized controlled trials. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 647-654. doi:10.1007/s10896-016-9800-8
24.
SchoeningA. M.GreenwoodJ. L.McNicholsJ. A.HeermannJ. A.AgrawalS. (2004). Effect of an intimate partner violence educational program on the attitudes of nurses. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 33, 572-579.
25.
ShortL. M.SurprenantZ. J.HarrisJ. M. (2006). A community-based trial of an online intimate partner violence CME program. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 30, 181-185.
ThackwrayB. (1997). Effective evaluation of training and development in higher education. London, England: Kogan Page.
28.
ThompsonR. S.RivaraF.ThompsonD. C.BarlowW. E.SuggN. K.MaiuroR. D.RubanowiceM. D. (2000). Identification and management of domestic violence: A randomized trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 253-263.
29.
United Nations Development Fund for Women. (2010). Monitoring, evaluation and knowledge management framework. New York, NY: Author.
30.
VarcoeC.HankivskyO.Ford-GilboeM.WuestJ.WilkP.HammertonJ.CampbellJ. (2011). Attributing selected costs to intimate partner violence in a sample of women who have left abusive partners: A social determinants of health approach. Canadian Public Policy, 37, 359-380.
31.
WathenN. (2012). Health impacts of violent victimization on women and their children. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Justice Canada.
32.
World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
33.
ZaherE.KeoghK.RatnapalanS. (2014). Effect of domestic violence training: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Canadian Family Physician, 60, 618-624.
34.
ZhangT.HoddenbaghJ.McDonaldS.ScrimK. (2012). An estimation of the economic impact of spousal violence in Canada, 2009. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Department of Justice Canada.
