Previous research on violence during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina has resulted in a one-sided presentation of the phenomenon of “war violence.” Researchers have emphasized the importance of narratives in general but have not analyzed stories on war violence that were the product of interpersonal interaction and meaning-making activity. The aim of this article is to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing survivor narratives of the 1990s war in northwestern Bosnia. The focus is on analyzing interviewees’ descriptions of wartime violence and the discursive patterns that contribute to constructing the phenomenon of “war violence.” My analysis reveals an intimate relationship between how an interviewee interprets the biographical consequences of war violence and the individual’s own war experiences. All interviewees described war violence as something that is morally reprehensible. These narratives, from both perpetrators of violence and those subjected to violence, recount violent situations that not only exist as mental constructions but also live on even after the war; thus, they have real consequences for the individuals and their society.
ÅkerströmM. (2002). “Släps, punches, pinches—But not violence: Boundary-work in nursing homes for the elderly. Symbolic Interaction, 25, 515-536.
2.
AthensL. (1997). Violent criminal acts and actors revisited. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
3.
BasicG. (2005). War and crime. Definitions of crime in a Bosnian post-war society. Lund, Sweden: Network for Research in Criminology and Deviant Behavior.
4.
BasicG. (2007). Would I grill lamb with you? Reconciliation and implacability in stories of former prison-camp detainees. Lund, Sweden: Network for Research in Criminology and Deviant Behavior.
5.
BasicG. (2015a). Conditions for reconciliation: Narratives of survivors from the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 17(2), 107-126.
6.
BasicG. (2015b). Constructing ‘ideal victim’ stories of Bosnian war survivors. Social Inclusion, 3(4), 25-37.
7.
BasicG. (2015c). Reconciliation narratives of survivors from war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In PullaV.MamidiB. B. (Eds.), Some aspects of community empowerment and resilience (pp. 189-205). New Delhi, India: Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
8.
BasicG. (2015d). Stories of sexualized war violence after the Bosnian war. In AndradaF.MichaelP. (Eds.), Femicide. Targeting of women in conflict. A global issue that demands action (Vol. III, pp. 102-105). Vienna, Austria: The Academic Council on the United Nations System (ACUNS).
9.
BasicG. (2015e). Victimhood, forgiveness and reconciliation: In stories of Bosnian war survivors. In OlsenE. L. (Ed.), Forgiveness: Social significance, health impact and psychological effects (pp. 105-130). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
10.
BasicG. (2017). Concentration camp rituals: Narratives of former Bosnian detainees. Humanity and Society, 41, 73-94. doi:10.1177/0160597615621593
11.
BaumanZ. (1991). Modernity and the holocaust. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
BecirevicE. (2010). The issue of genocidal intent and denial of genocide: A case study of Bosnia and Herzegovina. East European Politics and Societies, 24, 480-502.
13.
BetzJ. (1977). Violence: Garvers definition and a Deweyan correction. Ethics, 87, 339-351.
14.
BlattmanC.MiguelE. (2009). Civil war. Berkeley, CA: Center for International and Development Economics Research.
15.
BlumerH. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1969)
16.
BougarelX.HelmsE.DuijzingsG. (2007). The new Bosnian mosaic: Identities, memories and moral claims in a post-war society. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Press.
17.
BrowningC. R. (1992). Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. London, England: Harper Collins.
18.
Case No.: IT-09-92-PT. Fourth Amended Indictment and Schedules of Incidents in Case of Ratko Mladić. 16 December 2011. Haag, Germany: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
19.
Case No.: IT-95-8-S. Judgment in case of Dusko Sikirica, Damir Dosen and Dragen Kolundzija. 13 November 2001. Haag, Germany: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
20.
Case No.: IT-95-5/18-PT. Third Amended Indictment in Case of Radovan Karadžić. 27 February 2009. Haag, Germany: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
21.
Case No.: IT-97-24-T. Judgment in case of Milomir Stakic. 31 July 2003. Haag, Germany: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
22.
Case No.: IT-98-30/1-A. Judgment in case of Miroslav Kvocka, Mlado Radic, Zoran Zigic and Dragoljub Prcac. 28 February 2005. Haag, Germany: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
23.
Case No.: IT-99-36-T. Judgment in case of Radoslav Brdjanin. 1 September 2004. Haag, Germany: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
24.
CekicS. (2009). Research of genocide victims, with a special emhasis on Bosnia and Herzegovina: Problems and issues in scientific theory and methodology. Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina: Institute for the Research of Crimes Against Humanity and International Law of the University of Sarajevo.
25.
CollinsR. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
CollinsR. (2008). Violence: A micro-sociological theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
29.
GarfinkelH. (1984). Studies in ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1967)
30.
GreveH. S.BergsmoM. (1994). The prijedor report (Annex V. Final report of the United Nations commission of experts established pursuant to security council resolution 780[1992], S/194/674/Add. 2, Vol. I). New York, NY: United Nations.
31.
HatzfeldJ. (2005). Machete season: The killers in Rwanda speak. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
32.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (1995). The active interview (Qualitative Research, Method Series 37). London, England: SAGE.
33.
HougeA. B. (2008). Subversive victims? The (non) reporting of sexual violence against male victims during the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Nordicom Review, 29, 63-78.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (2015a). The cases. Haag, Germany: Author. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/action/cases/4, 20150114
36.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (2015b). Judgement List. Haag, Germany: Author.
37.
Patria. (2000). Ni krivi ni dužni. Knjiga nestalih općine Prijedor (Without any reason. Book of the missing persons in the Prijedor municipality). Sanski Most, Bosnia & Herzegovina: IPC Patria and Udruženje Prijedorčanki “Izvor.”
38.
KatzJ. (1988). Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York, NY: Basic Books.
39.
LeeA. F. (2009). Killing neighbors: Webs of violence in Rwanda. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
40.
MaleševićS. (2010). The sociology of war and violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Mannergren SelimovicJ. (2010). Perpetrators and victims: Local responses to the ICTY in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Focaal, European Journal of Anthropology, 2010(57), 50-61.
42.
MačekI. (2009). Sarajevo under siege: Anthropology in wartime. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43.
MegargeeP. G. (2013a). Encyclopedia of camps and ghettos 1933-1945: Volume I. Washington, DC: U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.
44.
MegargeeP. G. (2013b). Encyclopedia of camps and ghettos 1933-1945: Volume II. Washington, DC: U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.
45.
PotterJ. (2007). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London, England: SAGE. (Original work published 1996)
46.
PresserL. (2013). Why we harm. London, England: Rutgers University Press.
47.
RapleyT. J. (2001). “The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1, 303-323.
48.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Qualitative Research Method Series, Vol. 30). London, England: SAGE.
49.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
SchinkelW. (2004). The will to violence. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 5-31.
51.
SilvermanD. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London, England. (Original work published 1993)
52.
SimmelG. (1955). Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1908)
53.
SkjelsbækI. (2007). Voicing silence: A political psychological analysis of the aftermath of the Bosnia-Herzegovinan war rapes. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
54.
StankoE. A. (2003). The meanings of violence. London, England: Roudedge.
55.
StefljaI. (2010). Identity crisis in post-conflict societies: The ICTY’s role in defensive nationalism among the Serbs. Global Change, Peace & Security, 22, 231-248.
56.
StoverE.WeinsteinH. M. (2004). My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
TabeauE. (2009). Rat u brojkama: demografski gubici u ratovima na teritoriji bivše Jugoslavije od 1991. do 1999 (The war in numbers: Demographic losses in the wars in the former Yugoslavia from 1991 to 1999). Beograd: Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava u Srbiji (Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia).
58.
TheidonK. (2001). Terror’s talk: Fieldwork and war. Dialectical Anthropology, 26, 19-35.
59.
TokacaM. (2013). Bosanska knjiga mrtvih-Ljudski gubici u BiH 91-95 (The Bosnian book of the dead-human losses in BiH 91-95). Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina: Istraživačko dokumentacioni centar (Research and Documentation Center).
60.
WästerforsD. (2014). Book review: Why we harm. Acta Sociologica, 57, 271-272.
WrongH. D. (1979). Power: Its forms, bases and uses. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
63.
ZwierzchowskiJ.TabeauE. (2010, February1-2). The 1992-95 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Census-based multiple system estimation of causalities’ undercount. Conference Paper for the International Research Workshop on “The Global Costs of Conflict,” The Households in Conflict Network (HiCN) and The German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Berlin, Germany.
