This article presents a study that examined beliefs about violent husbands and about helping battered women among Palestinian women living in Israel from the perspective of patriarchal ideology. A convenience sample of 701 married women was obtained, and a self-report questionnaire was administered. The findings reveal that the majority of participants held violent husbands accountable for their behavior; however, the majority of them did not support punishing violent husbands through formal agencies (i.e., the police) or through informal social institutions (i.e., the family). In addition, contrary to expectations, the majority of women perceived wife beating as a social problem rather than as a private one that should be dealt with within the family. Regression and multiple regression analysis revealed that women’s endorsement of patriarchal ideology was found to influence all three above-mentioned beliefs about violent husbands and battered women, over and above the amount of variance in each of these beliefs that could be attributed to the women’s sociodemographic characteristics. The limitations of the study and its implications for future research are discussed.
Abu BakerK. (2007). Hamishpaha hafalastinit bisrael [The Palestinian family in Israel]. Tel Aviv, Israel: The Open University Press (Hebrew).
2.
Abu-RasW. (2003). Barriers to services for battered Arab immigrant women in a Detroit suburb. Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation, 4, 49-66.
3.
Abu-RasW. (2007). Cultural beliefs and service utilization by battered Arab immigrant women. Violence Against Women, 13, 1002-1028.
4.
AhmadF.DriverN.McNallyM. J.StewartD. E. (2009). “Why doesn’t she seek help for partner abuse?” An exploratory study with South Asian immigrant women. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 613-622.
5.
AlnabilsyR. (2013). Habayit do’ekh beha’der nashotav: Alimut neged nashim araviyot al yedey ben-zugan: Hakesher hahevrati-tarbuti vehasoziopoliti shel tfisat haba’aya, hashlakhoteha vehahitmodedut ima [The house collapses in the absence of its women: Violence against Arab women by their husbands: The socio-cultural and socio-political contexts of the perception of the problem, its implications, and coping with it] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel (Hebrew).
6.
BhanotS.SennC. Y. (2007). Attitudes towards violence against women in men of South Asian ancestry: Are acculturation and gender role attitudes important factors?Journal of Family Violence, 22, 25-31.
7.
BtoushR.Haj-YahiaM. M. (2008). Attitudes of Jordanian society toward wife abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1531-1554.
8.
BuiH. (2005). Perceptions of intimate violence and attitudes toward interventions. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 3(4), 1-27.
9.
BurtT. M. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
10.
DhaherE.MikolajczykR. T.MaxwellA.KrämerA. (2010). Attitudes toward wife beating among Palestinian women of reproductive age from three cities in the West Bank. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 518-537.
11.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York, NY: The Free Press.
12.
DoukiS.NacefF.BelhadjA.BouaskerA.GhachemR. (2003). Violence against women in Arab and Islamic countries. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 6, 165-171.
13.
DunnM.DeBonisN. J. (1979). Teachers and counselors guide to accompany a Marriage Role Expectations Inventory. Saluda, NC: Family Life Publications.
14.
EisikovitsZ.WinstokZ.FishmanG. (2004). The first Israeli National Survey on domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 10, 729-748.
15.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1998a). Beliefs about wife-beating among Palestinian women: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Violence Against Women, 4, 533-558.
16.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1998b). A patriarchal perspective of beliefs about wife-beating among Arab Palestinian men from the West Bank and Gaza. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 595-621.
17.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2000). Wife abuse and battering in the sociocultural context of Arab society. Family Process, 39, 237-255.
18.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2002a). Attitudes of Arab women toward different patterns of coping with wife abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 721-745.
19.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2002b). Beliefs of Jordanian women about wife beating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 282-291.
20.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2003). Beliefs about wife beating among Arab men from Israel: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 193-206.
21.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2011). Contextualizing interventions with battered women in collectivist societies: Issues and controversies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 331-339.
22.
Haj-YahiaM. M.EdlesonJ. L. (1994). Predicting the use of conflict resolution tactics among engaged Arab-Palestinian men in Israel. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 47-62.
23.
Haj-YahiaM. M.WilsonR. M.NaqviS. A. M. (2012). Justification, perception of severity and harm, and criminalization of wife abuse in the Palestinian society. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1932-1958.
24.
HeiseL. L. (2011). What works to prevent partner violence: An evidence overview. London, England: Strive Research Consortium.
25.
HerzogS. (2004). Differential perceptions of the seriousness of male violence against female partners among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 891-900.
26.
HunnicuttG. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15, 553-573.
27.
KachiganS. K. (1986). Statistical analysis: An interdisciplinary introduction to univariate and multivariate methods. New York, NY: Radius Press.
28.
KennedyM. A.GorzalkaB. B. (2002). Asian and non-Asian attitudes toward rape, sexual harassment, and sexuality. Sex Roles, 46, 227-238.
KulwickiA.BalloutS.KilgoreH. A.HammadA.DervartanianH. (2015). Intimate partner violence, depression, and barriers to service utilization in Arab American women. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 26, 24-30.
31.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
32.
MarloweD.CrowneD. P. (1961). Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 109-115.
33.
MoghadamV. M. (2003). Modernizing women: Gender and social change in the Middle East. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
34.
PavlouM.KnowlesA. (2001). Domestic violence: Attributions, recommended punishments and reporting behaviour related to provocation by the victim. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8, 76-85.
35.
RaniM.BonuS. (2008). Attitudes toward wife beating: A cross-country study in Asia. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1371-1397.
36.
SakalliN. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44, 599-610.
37.
SaundersD. G.LynchA. B.GraysonM.LinzD. (1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39-57.
38.
Shalhoub-KevorkianN. (1999). Law, politics, and violence against women: A case study of Palestinians in Israel. Law & Policy, 21, 189-211.
39.
Shalhoub-KevorkianN. (2000). Blocking her exclusion: A contextually sensitive model of intervention for handling female abuse. Social Service Review, 74, 621-634.
40.
SmithM. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257-274.
41.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Psychological correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
42.
WaltermaurerE. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 167-175.
43.
WattsC.ZimmermanC. (2002). Violence against women: Global scope and magnitude. The Lancet, 359, 1232-1237.
44.
WuY.ButtonD. M.SmolterN.PoteyevaM. (2013). Public responses to intimate partner violence: Comparing preferences of Chinese and American college students. Violence and Victims, 28, 303-323.
45.
YllöK. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In GellesR. J.LosekeD. R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
