Although batterer intervention programs (BIPs) are often mandated for perpetrators of intimate partner violence, the precursors and mechanisms of change operating within these programs remain unclear. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the perceptions and experiences of participants in a diverse, group-based male BIP to better understand factors facilitating positive change. Data were gathered through individual interviews with 15 men and were analyzed using grounded theory. Findings suggest that change is taking place through a reciprocal process in which change occurring via the group context facilitates change within participants and vice versa. The specific benefits of the group context and value of group diversity were emphasized. Factors supporting this change process include the role of group facilitators and providing group members with access to ongoing support. These results are useful for informing the continued implementation and adaptation of BIPs with the goal of reducing and ultimately terminating abusive behaviors.
Alternatives to Domestic Aggression. (2003). Accountability workbook. Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County, Alternatives to Domestic Aggression. Retrieved from http://csswashtenaw.org/ada/
2.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.RobieC. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
3.
BennettL. W.WilliamsO. J. (2001). Intervention programs for men who batter. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L.BergenR. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 261-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.. . . StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
5.
BoiraS.del CastilloM. F.CarbajosaP.MarcuelloC. (2013). Context of treatment and therapeutic alliance: Critical factors in court-mandated batterer intervention programs. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E40.
6.
BreidingM. J.BlackM. C.RyanG. W. (2008). Chronic disease and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence—18 U.S. states/territories. Annals of Epidemiology, 18, 538-544.
7.
ButtellF. P.CarneyM. M. (2005). Do batterer intervention programs serve African American and Caucasian batterers equally well? An investigation of a 26-week program. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 19-28.
8.
CampbellJ. C.JonesA. S.DienemannJ.KubJ.SchollenbergerJ.O’CampoP.. . . WynneC. (2002). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1157-1163.
9.
CarterL. S. (2010). Batterer intervention: Doing the work and measuring the progress. San Francisco, CA: Family Violence Prevention Fund.
CokerA. L.DavisK. E.AriasI.DesaiS.SandersonM.BrandtH. M.SmithP. H. (2002). Physical and mental effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 23, 260-268.
13.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D.AlviS. (2000). The role of profeminist men in dealing with woman abuse on the Canadian college campus. Violence Against Women, 6, 918-935.
14.
ElliottR.FischerC. T.RennieD. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
15.
FassingerR. E. (2005). Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 156-166.
16.
FederL.WilsonD. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior?Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239-262.
17.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
18.
GondolfE. W. (1997). Batterer programs: What we know and need to know. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 83-98.
19.
GondolfE. W. (2004). Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 605-631.
20.
GondolfE. W. (2012). The future of batterer programs: Reassessing evidence-based practice. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
21.
GrayR.LewisP.MokanyT.O’NeillB. (2014). Peer discussion and client motivation in men’s domestic violence programs: An Australian qualitative interview study. Australian Social Work, 67, 390-404.
22.
HartB. (2009, November). Future directions for BIPs: Examining the power of male peer support and building alternative support communities. Paper presented at the Batterer Intervention: Doing the Work and Measuring the Progress Experts Roundtable. Retrieved from http://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/articles/future_directions_bips.pdf
23.
HeiseL.Garcia-MorenoC. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In KrugE. G.DahlbergL. L.MercyJ. A.ZwiA. B.LozanoR. (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 89-121). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
24.
JacksonS.FederL.FordeD. R.DavisR. C.MaxwellC. D.TaylorB. G. (2003). Batterer intervention programs: Where do we go from here? (National Institute of Justice Special Report NCJ 195079). Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/195079.pdf
LaRossaR. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837-857.
27.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
MaxW.RiceD. P.FinkelsteinE.BardwellR. A.LeadbetterS. (2004). The economic toll of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Violence and Victims, 19, 259-272.
29.
PandyaV.GingerichW. J. (2002). Group therapy intervention for male batterers: A microethnographic study. Health & Social Work, 27, 47-55.
30.
Parra-CardonaJ. R.Escobar-ChewA. R.HoltropK.CarpenterG.GuzmánR.HernándezD.. . . RamírezD. G. (2013). “En el grupo tomas conciencia (In group you become aware)”: Latino immigrants’ satisfaction with a culturally informed intervention for men who batter. Violence Against Women, 19, 107-132.
31.
PenceE.PaymarM. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York, NY: Springer.
PriceB. J.RosenbaumA. (2009). Batterer intervention programs: A report from the field. Violence and Victims, 24, 757-769.
34.
ScottK. L.WolfeD. A. (2000). Change among batterers: Examining men’s success stories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 827-842.
35.
ShamaiM.BuchbinderE. (2010). Control of the self: Partner-violent men’s experience of therapy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1338-1362.
36.
SheehanK. A.ThakorS.StewartD. E. (2012). Turning points for perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 30-40.
37.
SilvergleidC. S.MankowskiE. S. (2006). How batterer intervention programs work: Participant and facilitator accounts of processes of change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 139-159.
38.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
WilliamsO. J.WilliamO.PopeM. (2008). Domestic violence in the African American community. Journal of Aggression, 16, 229-237.
40.
World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and nonpartner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85239/1/9789241564625_eng.pdf?ua=1
