Measures of violent behavior are often assumed to function identically across different groups (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity). However, failure to verify measurement invariance can lead to biased cross-group comparisons. The current study examines the measurement invariance of the Violent Behavior Checklist–Modified across genders and race/ethnicities. Using multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, configural and metric invariance are assessed in a sample of racially/ethnically diverse middle and high school students (N = 4,128) in two rural counties. Results indicate that the Violent Behavior Checklist–Modified has partial measurement invariance across genders and race/ethnicities. Specifically, four out of six items were non-invariant across genders, while one out of six items was non-invariant across race/ethnicities. Findings suggest that the latent factor of violence may be qualitatively different across males and females. Implications are discussed.
BowenG. L.RichmanJ. M. (2008). The school success profile. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
2.
BowenN. K.GuoS. (2012). Structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthénB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.456
4.
ByrneB. M.WatkinsD. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 155-175. doi:10.1177/0022022102250225
5.
ChenF. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005-1018. doi:10.1037/a0013193
6.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
7.
ConradK. J.RileyB. B.ConradK. M.ChanY.DennisM. L. (2010). Validation of the Crime and Violence Scale (CVS) against Rasch measurement model including differences by gender, race, and age. Evaluation Review, 34, 83-115. doi:10.1177/0193841X10362162
8.
DahlbergL. L.ToalS. B.SwahnM.BehrensC. B. (2005). Measuring violence-related attitudes, behaviors, and influences among youths: A compendium of assessment tools (2nd ed.). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
9.
DeVellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
EdelenM. O.McCaffreyD. F.MarshallG. N.JaycoxL. H. (2009). Measurement of teen dating violence attitudes: An item response theory evaluation of differential item functioning according to gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1243-1260. doi:10.1177/0886260508322187
FeasterD. J.RobbinsM. S.HendersonC.HorigianV.PuccinelliM. J.BurlewA. K.SzapocznikJ. (2010). Equivalence of family functioning and externalizing in adolescent substance users of different race/ethnicity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38S1, S113-S124. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.010
14.
FrisellT.PawitanY.LangstromN.LichtensteinP. (2012). Heritability, assertive mating, and gender differences in violent crime: Results from a total population sample using twin, adoption, and sibling models. Behavioral Genetics, 42, 3-18. doi:10.1007/s10519-011-9483-0
15.
GarnaatS. L.NortonP. J. (2010). Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale across four racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 723-728. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.004
16.
GlanvilleJ. L.WildhagenT. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 1019-1041. doi:10.1177/0013164406299126
17.
GregorichS. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44(11, Suppl. 3), S78-S94. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f
18.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
19.
KrugE. G.DahlbergL. L.MercyJ. A.ZwiA. B.LozanoR. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
20.
MillerS.Gorman-SmithD.SullivanT.OrpinasP.SimonT. R. (2009). Parent and peer predictors of physical dating violence perpetration in early adolescence: Tests of moderations and gender differences. Journal of Clinical & Adolescent Psychology, 38, 538-550. doi:10.1080/15374410902976270
21.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
22.
NadelH.SpellmannM.Alvarez-CaninoT.Lausell-BryantL.LandsbergG. (1996). The cycle of violence and victimization: A study of the school-based intervention of a multidisciplinary youth violence-prevention program. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 109-119. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07493797
23.
OdgersC. L.MoffittT. E.BroadbentJ. M.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.. . . CaspiA. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 673-716. doi:10.1017/S095457908000333
24.
PetersonD.EsbensenF.TaylorT. J.FrengA. (2007). Youth violence in context: The roles of sex, race, and community in offending. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 385-410. doi:10.1177/1541204006297369
25.
ThombsB. D.LewisC.BernsteinD. P.MedranoM. A.HatchJ. P. (2007). An evaluation of the measurement equivalence of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire—Short Form across gender and race in a sample of drug-abusing adults. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63, 391-398. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.04.010
26.
TopitzesJ.MerskyJ. P.ReynoldsA. J. (2012). From childhood maltreatment to violent offending: An examination of mixed-gender and gender-specific models. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2322-2347. doi:10.1177/0886260511433510
27.
WuA. D.LiZ.ZumboB. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(3), 1-26. Available from http://pareonline.net/
28.
ZhengY.ClevelandH. H. (2013). Identifying gender-specific developmental trajectories of nonviolent and violent delinquency from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 371-381. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.007
