The purpose of the present study was to examine mock juror perceptions of rape victims based on the sex of the offender and victim (male offender/female victim vs. female offender/male victim), relationship to the offender (stranger vs. acquaintance vs. intimate partner), revictimization (no revictimization vs. revictimization), and individual differences in rape myth acceptance (RMA) and life history strategy (LHS). Participants (N = 332) read a vignette describing a forcible rape scenario and completed victim and perpetrator blame scales, the Mini-K, and a gender-neutral Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Results indicated increased victim blame in revictimization conditions, as well as female offender/male victim conditions. A significant mediation effect of LHS on victim blame through the indirect effect of RMA was found, which is predicted from life history theory. Implications of these findings are discussed.
AndersonI. (2007). What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 225-245. doi:10.1348/014466606X101780
2.
AosvedA. C.LongP. J.VollerE. K. (2011). Sexual revictimization and adjustment in college men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12, 285-296. doi:10.1037/a0020828
3.
ArehI.MeskoG.UmekP. (2009). Attribution of personal characteristics to victims of rape-police officers’ perspectives. Studia Psychologica, 51, 85-100.
4.
BarnettM. A.QuackenbushS. W.SinisiC. S.WegmanC. M. (1992). Factors affecting reactions to a rape victim. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 126, 609-620.
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6.
BieneckS.KrahéB. (2011). Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1785-1797. doi:10.1177/0886260510372945
7.
BlumbergM. L.LesterD. (1991). High school and college students’ attitudes toward rape. Adolescence, 26, 727-729.
8.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
9.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
10.
ClassenC. C.Gronskaya PaleshO.AggarwalR. (2005). Sexual revictimization: A review of the empirical literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 103-129. doi:10.1177/1524838005275087
11.
CoxellA. W.KingM. B. (2010). Male victims of rape and sexual abuse. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 380-391. doi:10.1080/02674659608404443
12.
CramerR. J.KehnA.PenningtonC. R.WechslerH. J.ClarkJ. W.NagleJ. (2013). An examination of sexual orientation- and transgender-based hate crimes in the post-Matthew Shepard era. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 355-368.
13.
DaviesM.McCartneyS. (2003). Effects of gender and sexuality on judgments of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 391-398. doi:10.1002/casp.741
14.
DaviesM.RogersP.BatesJ. (2008). Blame toward male rape victims in a hypothetical sexual assault as a function of victim sexuality and degree of resistance. Journal of Homosexuality, 55, 533-544. doi:10.1080/00918360802345339
15.
DohertyK.AndersonI. (2004). Making sense of male rape: Constructions of gender, sexuality and experience of rape victims. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 85-103. doi:10.1002/casp.765
16.
EdwardsK. M.TurchikJ. T.DardisT.ReynoldsN.GidyczC. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761-773. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2
17.
EllisB. J.FigueredoA.BrumbachB. H.SchlomerG. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204-268. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7
18.
EllisL. (1988). Criminal behavior and r/K selection: An extension of gene-based evolutionary theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 697-708. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(88)90059-1
19.
FeildH. S. (1978). Juror background characteristics and attitudes toward rape: Correlates of jurors’ decisions in rape trials. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 73-93. doi:10.1007/BF01040385
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SchneiderS. M. R. (2004). The heritability of life history strategy: The K-factor, covitality, and personality. Social Biology, 51(3-4), 121-143. doi:10.1080/19485565.2004.9989090
22.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SchneiderS. M. R. (2007). The K-factor, covitality, and personality: A psychometric test of life history theory. Human Nature, 18, 47-73. doi:10.1007/BF02820846
23.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SchneiderS. M. R.SefcekJ. A.TalI. R.. . . JacobsW. J. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243-275. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002
24.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SefcekJ.KirsnerB. R.JacobsW. (2005). The K-factor: Individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1349-1360. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.009
25.
FordT. M.Liwag-McLambM. G.FoleyL. A. (1998). Perceptions of rape based on sex and sexual orientation of victim. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 253-262.
26.
GidyczC. A.CobleC. N.LathamL.LaymanM. J. (1993). Sexual assault experience in adulthood and prior victimization experiences: A prospective analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 151-168. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00441.x
27.
GladdenP. R.SiscoM.FigueredoA. J. (2008). Sexual coercion and life history strategy. Evolution & Human Behavior, 29, 319-326. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.03.003
28.
GrubbA.HarrowerJ. (2009). Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 63-81. doi:10.1080/13552600802641649
29.
HannonR.HallD. S.NashH.FormatiJ.HopsonT. (2000). Judgments regarding sexual aggression as a function of sex of aggressor and victim. Sex Roles, 43, 311-322. doi:10.1023/A:1026643225329
30.
LoganT.ColeJ.CapilloA. (2007). Differential characteristics of intimate partner, acquaintance, and stranger rape survivors examined by a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1066-1076. doi:10.1177/0886260507302996
MartinE. K.TaftC. T.ResickP. A. (2007). A review of marital rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 329-347. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.003
33.
Messman-MooreT. L.BrownA. L. (2006). Risk perception, rape, and sexual revictimization: A prospective study of college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 159-172. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00279.x
34.
Messman-MooreT. L.WardR. M. (2009). Substance use and PTSD symptoms impact the likelihood of rape and revictimization in college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 499-521. doi:10.1177/0886260508317199
35.
MillerA. K.MarkmanK. D.HandleyI. M. (2007). Self-blame among sexual assault victims prospectively predicts revictimization: A perceived sociolegal context model of risk. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 129-136. doi:10.1080/01973530701331585
36.
MitchellD.HirschmanR.HallG. (1999). Attributions of victim responsibility, pleasure, and trauma in male rape. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 369-373. doi:10.1080/00224499909552009
37.
NuñezN.McCreaS. M.CulhaneS. E. (2011). Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 439-451. doi:10.1002/bsl.967
38.
PlantyM.BerzofskyM.KrebsC.LangtonL.Smiley-McDonaldH. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994-2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
39.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
40.
RayburnN.MendozaM.DavisonG. C. (2003). Bystanders’ perceptions of perpetrators and victims of hate crime: An investigation using the person perception paradigm. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1055-1074. doi:10.1177/0886260503254513
41.
RushtonJ. P. (1985). Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality & Individual Differences, 6, 441-452. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90137-0
42.
SalmonC.FigueredoA.WoodburnL. (2009). Life history strategy and disordered eating behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 585-600.
43.
SchutteJ. W.HoschH. M. (1997). Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 759-772.
44.
Sheldon-KellerA.Lloyd-McGarveyE.WestM.CanterburyR. J. (1994). Attachment and assessment of blame in date rape scenarios. Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 313-318. doi:10.2224/sbp.1994.22.4.313
45.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
46.
SinclairH. C.BourneL. E.Jr. (1998). Cycle of blame or just world: Effects of legal verdicts on gender patterns in rape-myth acceptance and victim empathy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 575-588.
47.
SmithR. E.PineC. J.HawleyM. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101-112. doi:10.1080/00224498809551401
48.
SorensonS. B.SiegelJ. M.GoldingJ. M.SteinJ. A. (1991). Repeated sexual victimization. Violence and Victims, 6, 299-308.
49.
StearnsS. C. (1992). The evolution of life histories. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261. doi:10.1007/s10940-006-9010-2
51.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women (NCJ 13781). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
52.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ 210346). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
53.
TurchikJ. A.EdwardsK. M. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 211-226. doi:10.1037/a0023207
