Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a common type of violence that is associated with a number of psychological problems among women who experience it. Recent research suggests that interpersonal style may influence the degree to which women exhibit psychological problems following IPV exposure. One possible mechanism through which interpersonal style may exert its effects is by influencing appraisals of the violence they experience, although this has not yet been tested empirically. In this study, we examined the effects of dimensions of interpersonal style (dominance and warmth) on IPV appraisals in a sample of young adult women (N = 219) who reported experiencing physical and/or sexual violence from their romantic partner in the past year using a Bayesian approach to multiple linear regression. Our results indicated that both dominance and warmth were associated with less negative (i.e., less betrayed, self-blaming, fearful, alienated, angry, and shameful) appraisals of IPV, exhibiting small- to medium-sized effects when controlling for severity of violence. However, this effect was more prominent for dominance than for warmth. These findings shed light on the role of interpersonal style in the response to IPV and indicate directions for future research.
Amanor-BoaduY.StithS. M.MillerM. S.CookJ.AllenL.GorzekM. (2011). Impact of dating violence on male and female college students. Partner Abuse, 2, 323-343.
2.
AmarA. F.GennaroS. (2005). Dating violence in college women: Associated physical injury, healthcare usage, and mental health symptoms. Nursing Research, 54, 235-242.
3.
BlattS. J.D’AfflittiJ. P.QuinlanD. M. (1976). Experiences of depression in normal young adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 383-389.
4.
BlattS. J.LuytenP. (2011). Relatedness and self-definition in normal and disrupted personality development. In HorowitzL. M.StrackS. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic intervention (pp. 37-56). New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
6.
CostaP. T.Jr.SomerfieldM. R.McCraeR. R. (1996). Personality and coping: A reconceptualization. In ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Handbook of coping (pp. 44-61). New York, NY: John Wiley.
7.
CummingG. (2011). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29.
9.
DePrinceA. P.ChuA. T.PinedaA. S. (2011). Links between specific posttrauma appraisals and three forms of trauma-related distress. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 3, 430-441.
10.
DePrinceA. P.ZurbriggenE. L.ChuA. T.SmartL. (2010). Development of the trauma appraisal questionnaire. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19, 275-299.
11.
EshelmanL.LevendoskyA. A. (2012). Dating violence: Mental health consequences based on type of abuse. Violence and Victims, 27, 215-228.
12.
FreydJ. J. (1996). Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
GamermanD.LopesH. F. (2006). Markov chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
14.
GarcíaL. F.EscorialS.GarcíaÓ.BlanchA.AlujaA. (2012). Structural analysis of the facets and domains of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA–PQ) and the NEO PI–R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 156-163.
15.
GelfandA. E.SmithA. F. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398-409.
16.
GrayM. J.LitzB. T.HsuJ. L.LombardoT. W. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Life Events Checklist. Assessment, 11, 330-341.
17.
Helweg-LarsenM.HardingH. G.KleinmanK. E. (2008). Risk perceptions of dating violence among college women: The role of experience and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 27, 600-620.
18.
HemenoverS. H. (2001). Self-reported processing bias and naturally occurring mood: Mediators between personality and stress appraisals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 387-394.
19.
HopwoodC. J.PincusA. L.WrightA. G. C. (in press). The interpersonal situation: Integrating clinical assessment, formulation, and intervention. In LynamD. R.SamuelD. B. (Eds.), Using basic personality research to inform the personality disorders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: The Free Press.
21.
KaiselerM.PolmanR. C.NichollsA. R. (2012). Effects of the Big Five personality dimensions on appraisal coping, and coping effectiveness in sport. European Journal of Sport Science, 12, 62-72.
22.
KotovR.GamezW.SchmidtF.WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768-821.
23.
KruschkeJ. K. (2011). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS. New York, NY: Elsevier.
24.
KruschkeJ. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes thet test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 573-603.
25.
LazarusR. (1994). Appraisal: The long and short of it. In EkmanP.DavidsonR. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 208-215). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
LevendoskyA. A.LannertB. K.YalchM. M. (2012). The effects of intimate partner violence on women and child survivors: An attachment perspective. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 40, 397-433.
27.
MarshallL. L. (1992). Development of the severity of violence against women scales. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 103-121.
28.
MartinC. G.CromerL. D.DePrinceA. P.FreydJ. J. (2013). The role of cumulative trauma, betrayal, and appraisals in understanding trauma symptomatology. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 5, 110-118.
29.
Martinez-TorteyaC.BogatG. A.von EyeA.LevendoskyA. A.DavidsonI. I.DavidsonW. S. (2009). Women’s appraisals of intimate partner violence stressfulness and their relationship to depressive and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Violence and Victims, 24, 707-722.
30.
MeadeA. W.CraigS. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437-455.
31.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive–affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
32.
MischelW.ShodaY. (2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the Cognitive–Affective Processing System. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 208-241). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
NeisserU. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
34.
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 257-301.
35.
PincusA. L.HopwoodC. J. (2012). A contemporary interpersonal model of personality pathology and personality disorder. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 372-398). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
PlummerM. (2003). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/Conferences/DSC-2003/
37.
ResickP. A.GalovskiT. E.UhlmansiekM. O. B.ScherC. D.ClumG. A.Young-XuY. (2008). A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female victims of interpersonal violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 243-258.
38.
RootM. P. P. (1996). Women of color and traumatic stress in “domestic captivity”: Gender and race as disempowering statuses. In MarsellaA. J.FriedmanM. J.GerrityE. T.ScurfieldR. M. (Eds.), Ethnocultural aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder: Issues, research, and clinical applications (pp. 363-387). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39.
SorensonS. B. (1996). Violence against women: Examining ethnic differences and commonalities. Evaluation Review, 20, 123-145.
40.
SternD. B. (1997). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
41.
SullivanH. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
42.
WachtelP. L. (1994). Cyclical processes in personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 51-54.
43.
WachtelP. L. (2014). An integrative relational point of view. Psychotherapy, 51, 342-349.
44.
WalkerL. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
45.
WatsonD.HubbardB. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the Five-Factor model. Journal of Personality, 64, 737-774.
46.
WigginsJ. S. (1991). Dominance and warmth as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In GroveW. M.CicchettiD. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology, Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
47.
WigginsJ. S.TrapnellP.PhillipsN. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517-530.
48.
YalchM. M.BernardN. K.LevendoskyA. A. (2015). An interpersonal theory perspective on intimate partner violence. In BellamyE. (Ed.), Partner violence: Risk factors, therapeutic interventions and psychological impact (pp. 113-126). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
49.
YalchM. M.LannertB. K.HopwoodC. J.LevendoskyA. A. (2013). Interpersonal style moderates the effect of dating violence on symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 3171-3185.
