Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article takes a critical look at the recent Jensen, Shafer, Roby, and Roby study that found that juveniles and adults have no statistically significant different rates of passing sexual history polygraph examinations. Numerous research and statistical issues are identified, including lack of independence, no adjustment for differing rates of opportunity across ages, poor construct validity of deceit, failure to adjust for base rates of deceit in subsequent analyses, and failure to include recidivism as an outcome. In addition, three arguments made by Jensen et al. against using recidivism as an outcome to judge post-conviction polygraph are discussed along with critical assessments of two recent studies examining the relationship between recidivism and sexual history polygraph examinations. It ends with a discussion of the current state of post-conviction polygraph testing research and way forward to find solid, replicable evidence that assesses its utility as a correctional intervention.

Keywords

polygraph recidivism correctional intervention assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agresti

Finlay

(2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson.

Allison

P. D.

(1999). Logistic regression using SAS®: Theory and application. Institute: Cary, NC: SAS.

Allison

P. D.

(2014). Event history and survival analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Biderman

A. D.

Reiss

A. J.

(1967). On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 374(1), 1-15.

Cook

Barkley

Anderson

P. B.

(2014). The Sexual History Polygraph Examination and Its Influences on Recidivism. The Journal of Social Change, 5(1), 6.

DeLisi

(2005). Career criminals in society. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Gelman

(2013). Interrogating p-values. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 188-189.

Grubin

Madsen

(2006). Accuracy and utility of post-conviction polygraph testing of sex offenders. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 479-483.

Hamilton

Z. K.

Campbell

C. M.

(2013). A dark figure of corrections: Failure by way of participation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 180-202.

10.

Heil

English

(2009). Sex offender polygraph testing in the United States: Trends and controversies. In Wilcox

D.T.

(ed.): The use of the polygraph in assessing, treating and supervising sex offenders: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 181-216). Wiley.

11.

Hogg

R. V.

Craig

(1994). Introduction to mathematical statistics (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

12.

Jensen

T. M.

Shafer

Roby

C. Y.

Roby

J. L.

(2015). Sexual history disclosure polygraph outcomes: Do juvenile and adult sex offenders differ? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 928-944. doi:10.1177/0886260514539766

13.

Konopasek

J. E.

(2011). Micro-level social learning correlates of sex offender recidivism: Expeditious sexual history disclosure via polygraph testing (Doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.

14.

Lutze

F. E.

Rosky

J. W.

Hamilton

Z. K.

(2014). Homelessness and reentry: A multisite outcome evaluation of Washington State’s Reentry Housing Program for high risk offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 471-491.

15.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Randi

Sagan

(1987). The faith healers. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

17.

Roese

N. J.

Jamieson

D. W.

(1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 363-375.

18.

Rosky

J. W.

(2013). The (f)utility of post-conviction polygraph testing. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 259-281.

19.

Shermer

(2001). The borderlands of science: Where sense meets nonsense. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

20.

Stuart

E. A.

(2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1-21.

21.

Thompson

(1995). Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: A guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 525-534.

22.

U.S. National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. National Washington, DC: Academies Press.

23.

Wright

K. A.

Rosky

J. W.

(2011). Too early is too soon. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 881-908.

More Polygraph Futility

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References