Despite its consistent and latent appearance in feminist accounts of intimate partner violence (IPV), the characterization of IPV as an elaborately ordered relationship whose norms are backed up by force is notably absent from the empirical IPV literature. Drawing on Emery’s typology of IPV, we hypothesized a curvilinear relationship between order and IPV injury. We developed a measure of relationship order and implemented it in a representative, randomly selected cluster sample of 250 families from Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Controlling for the severity of the IPV, higher levels of order, but not lower levels, are associated with higher numbers of reported IPV injuries. Theoretical and practical implications of order as a risk factor are discussed.
EmeryC.WuS.RaghavanR. (2013). Are residents of Beijing’s Hutongs better protected from intimate partner violence? Manuscript submitted for publication.
2.
BaronR.KennyD. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1173-1182.
3.
BlekesauneM. (2008). Partnership transitions and mental distress: Investigating temporal order. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 879-890.
4.
BrowningC. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 833-850.
5.
CarlsonC.ChenJ.ChangM.BatsukhA.TovigooA.RiedelM.WitteS. (2012). Reducing intimate and paying partner violence against women who exchange sex in Mongolia: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1911-1931.
6.
CastellsM.FurianettoL. (2005). Validity of the CAGE questionnaire for screening alcohol-dependent inpatients on hospital wards. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 27(1), 54-57.
7.
ChanK.ChoE. (2010). A review of cost measures for the economic impact of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 11, 129-143.
8.
ColemanD.StrausM. (1990). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. In StrausM.GellesR. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 287-304). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
9.
DobashR. E.DobashR. (1979). Violence against wives. New York, NY: Free Press.
10.
DurkheimE. (1984). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
11.
EfronB.TibshiraniR. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12.
EllsbergM.JansenH.HeiseL.WattsC.Garcia-MorenoC. (2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: An observational study. Lancet, 372, 1165-1172.
13.
EmeryC. (2011). Disorder or deviant order? Re-theorizing domestic violence in terms of order, power, and legitimacy: A typology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 525-540.
14.
EmeryC.JolleyJ.WuS. (2010). Intimate partner violence relationship dissolution among couples with children: The counterintuitive role of “law and order” neighborhoods. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 456-468.
15.
EmeryC.JolleyJ.WuS. (2011). Desistance from intimate partner violence: The role of neighborhoods’ legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and social disorganization in Chicago neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 373-383.
16.
EmeryC.KimJ.SongH.SongA. (2013). Child abuse as a catalyst for wife abuse?Journal of Family Violence, 28, 141-152.
17.
GouldM. (1987). Revolution in the development of capitalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
19.
HobbesT. (1962). Leviathan. New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1651).
20.
JohnsonM. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press.
21.
KantorG.StrausM. (1990). The “drunken bum” theory of wife beating. In StrausM.GellesR. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 203-226). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
22.
KennedyP. (2008). A guide to econometrics (6th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
KimJ.EmeryC. (2003). Marital power, conflict, norm consensus and marital violence in a nationally representative sample of Korean couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(2), 197-219.
24.
KornhauserR. (1978). Social sources of delinquency: An appraisal of analytic models. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
MatzaD. (1990). Delinquency and drift. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1964)
NamjilS. (1999). Mongolian family study. Mongolian History and Family Journal, 14, 13-16.
28.
OyunbilegS.SumberzulN.UdvalN.WangJ.JanesC. (2009). Prevalence and risk factors of domestic violence among Mongolian women. Journal of Women’s Health, 18, 1873-1880.
29.
ParsonsT. (1937). The structure of social action. New York, NY: Free Press.
30.
ParsonsT. (1948). The position of sociological theory. American Sociological Review, 13(2), 156-171.
31.
ParsonsT.SmelserN. (1956). Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
32.
PregibonD. (1980). Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models. Applied Statistics, 29, 15-24.
33.
SampsonR.RaudenbushS.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
34.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
StataCorp. (2009). Stata base reference manual: Release 11. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
36.
StrausM.DouglasE. (2004). A short form of the revised conflict tactics scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and Victims, 19, 507-520.
37.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1999). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ 181887). Washington, DC: National Justice Reference Service, National Institute of Justice.
38.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ 183781). Washington, DC: National Justice Reference Service, National Institute of Justice.
39.
Walton-MossB.ManganelloJ.FryeV.CampbellJ. (2005). Risk factor for intimate partner violence and associated injury among urban women. Journal of Community Health, 30, 377-389.
40.
WatersH.HyderA.RajkotiaY. (Eds.). (2004). The economic dimensions of interpersonal violence. Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Injuries and Violence Prevention, World Health Organization.
41.
WhitakerD.HaileyesusT.SwahnM.SaltzmanL. (2007). Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 941-947.
42.
WilsonJ.KellingG. (1982, March). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Magazine, 127, 29-38.
43.
ZhangL.MessnerS.LiuJ. (2007). A multilevel analysis of the risk of household burglary in the city of Tianjin, China. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 918-937.
