Benevolent Sexist Ideology Attributed to an Abusive Partner Decreases Women’s Active Coping Responses to Acts of Sexual Violence

Abstract

This article describes three studies in which we explored the influence of the sexist ideology attributed to the perpetrator on women’s responses to hypothetical acts of sexual assault perpetrated by male intimate partners. In Study 1 (n = 83), college women read three sexual assault scenarios in the context of an intimate relationship. The male partner’s sexist ideology (benevolent, hostile, or control) was manipulated within participants. Women showed less active responses when the partner had been described as a benevolent sexist man. This effect was replicated in Study 2 (n = 103), which showed a relationship between women’s less active responses and the belief that benevolent sexist men are very attracted to and interested in their partners. Study 3 (n = 130) demonstrated experimentally that women’s responses are less active when they are exposed to information that indicates that the perpetrator is both high in benevolent sexism and highly attracted to his victim than when the latter information is not provided. Results suggest that sexist ideology and particularly benevolent sexism—attributed to the perpetrator in this case—is highly important in women’s reactions to acts of sexual violence perpetrated by male intimate partners.