The present study examined the construct, concurrent and divergent validity, and reliability of the “Taxonomy of Problematic Social Situations-Adolescent self-report version” (TOPS-A) in a sample of 128 adolescents placed in Dutch secure juvenile facilities. The instrument measures inappropriate responses of adolescents to problematic social situations at the living group. Confirmatory factor analysis of a four-factor model (inappropriate responses to situations of disadvantage, competition, accepting/giving help, and accepting authority) with a second-order factor (inappropriate responses to problematic social situations) showed an exact fit to the data, indicating construct validity of the TOPS-A. Evidence for concurrent validity was found in associations with aggression and living group climate. Divergent validity could not be reliably assessed. Cronbach’s α reliability coefficients were satisfactory. The TOPS-A is a parsimonious instrument that can be used to assess and target inappropriate responses to problematic social situations in (delinquent) adolescents in secure institutional and correctional youth care.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2007). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2.
AnkarsaterH. T.NilssonO.StahlbergM.GustafsonJ. M.SauryM.RastamGillberhtC. (2007). Prevalences and configurations of mental disorders among institutionalized adolescents. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 10, 57-65.
3.
BiaggioM. K.SuppleeK.CurtisN. (1981). Reliability and validity of four anger scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 639-648.
4.
BrunnerR. L. (1991). The perceived stress scale. In SachikoT.Jeorst. (Ed.), Obesity assessment: tools, methods, interpretations (pp. 471-493). New York, NY: Chapmann & Hall.
5.
BurkeA. H.DurkeeA. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consultative Psychology, 21, 343-349.
6.
BussA. H.PerryM. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
7.
De JongJ. D., (2007). Kapot moeilijk, een etnografisch onderzoek naar opvallend delinquent groepsgedrag van ‘Marokkaanse’ jongens (“Dire Straits,” an ethnographic inquiry into obtrusive delinquent group activity of Moroccan boys). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Aksant.
8.
DeLisiM.DruryA. J.KosloskiA. E.CaudillJ. W.ConisP. J.AndersonC. A. (2009). The cycle of violence behind bars: Traumatization and institutional misconduct among juvenile delinquents in confinement. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 107-121.
9.
De WitJ.SlotW.van AkenM. (2009). Psychologie van de adolescentie (the psychology of adolescence). Baarn, The Netherlands: HB publishers.
10.
DodgeK. A.McClaskeyC.FeldmanE. (1985). Situational approach to the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 344-353.
11.
DyeM. H. (2010). Deprivation, importation, and prison suicide: Combined effects of institutional conditions and inmate composition. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 796-806.
12.
FluttertF. A. J. (2011). Management of inpatient aggression in forensic mental health (Doctoral dissertation). University of Utrecht, Enschede, The Netherlands: Gilde Print.
13.
FontaineR. G.DodgeK. A. (2009). The transactional development of individual social-information processing and aggressive behavior. In SameroffA. J. (Ed.), The transactional model of development (pp. 117-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
FosterS. L.InderbitzenH.NangleD. W. (1993). Assessing acceptance and social skills with peers in childhood: Current issues. Behavior Modification, 17, 255-286.
15.
FreedmanB. J.RosenthalL.DonahoeC. P.Jr.SchlundtD. G.McFallR. M. (1978). A social behavioural analysis of skill deficits in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1448-1462.
16.
GaffneyL. R.McFallR. M. (1981). A comparison of social skills in delinquent and nondelinquent girls using a behavioral role-playing inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 959-967.
17.
GoldfriedM. R.D’ZurillaT. J. (1969). A behavioral-analytic model for assessing competence. In SpielbergerC. (Ed.), Current topics and community psychology, 1 (pp. 151-196). New York, NY: Academic Press.
18.
GoverA. R.MacKenzieD. L.ArmstrongG. S. (2000). Importation and deprivation explanations of juveniles’ adjustment to correctional facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 450-467.
19.
HarveyJ. (2005). Young men in prison. Surviving and adapting to life inside. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
20.
KaalH.BrandE. F. J. M.van NieuwenhuizenM. (2012). Hetzelfde, maar toch (heel) anders. Jongeren met een licht verstandelijke beperking en een PIJ-maatregel vergeleken met normale PIJ-ers. (The same but [totally] different. adolescents with a mild intellectual disability and placement in a juvenile justice institution [“PIJ”] compared to normal incarcerated adolescents). Proces, 90, 299-311.
21.
LangeA.HoogendoornM.WiederspahnA. (1995). Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory for Dutch Language (Handleiding, verantwoording en normering van de Nederlandse Buss-Durkee Agressievragenlijst). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
22.
LieblingA.MarunaS. (2005). Introduction: The effects of imprisonment revisited. In LieblingA.MarunaS. (Eds), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 1-32). Cullompton, UK: Willan .
23.
LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds., (1998). Serious & violent juvenile offenders; risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
24.
MarshallW. L.BurtonD. L. (2010). The importance of group processes in offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 141-149.
25.
MatthysW.CuperusJ. M.MaassenG. H.Van EngelandH. (2001). The assessment of the situational specificity of children’s problem behaviour in peer–peer context. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 413-420.
26.
MatthysW.CuperusJ. M.Van EngelandH. (1999). Deficient social problem-solving in boys with ODD/CD, with ADHD, and with both disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 311-321.
27.
NangleD. W.EllisJ. T. (1994). Clinical utility of the taxonomy of problematic social situations for children (TOPS): Temporal stability and convergence with peer measures. Education of Children, 17, 1-17.
28.
NijhofK.VermulstA.ScholteH. J.van DamC.VeermanJ. W.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2011). Psychopathic traits of Dutch adolescents in residential care: Identifying subgroups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 59-70.
29.
OsgoodD. W.O’Neill BriddellL. (2006). Peer effects in juvenile justice. In DodgeK.DishionT.LansfordJ. (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 141-161). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
ParisiN. (1982). Prisoner’s pressures and responses. In ParisiN. (Ed.), Coping with imprisonment: Perspectives in Criminal Justice (pp. 9-26). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
SlotboomA.WongT. M. L.SwierC.BroekT. C.Van der (2011). Delinquente meisjes. Achtergronden, risicofactoren en interventies (Delinquent girls. Background, risk factors and interventions). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
32.
SykesG. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum-security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.), Boston, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
34.
UzielL. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243-262.
35.
Van der HelmG. H. P. (2011). First do no harm: Group climate in secure correctional institutions. Vu University, PhD thesis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SWP.
36.
Van der HelmG. H. P.BoekeeI.StamsG. J. J. M.Van der LaanP. H. (2011). Fear is the key: Keeping the balance between flexibility and control in a Dutch youth prison. Journal of Children’s Services, 6, 248-263
37.
Van der HelmG. H. P.KlapwijkM.StamsG. J. J. M.van der LaanP. H. (2009). “What works” for juvenile prisoners: The role of group climate in a youth prison. Journal of Children’s Services, 4, 36-48.
38.
Van der HelmG. H. P.StamsG. J. J .M.Van der LaanP. H. (2011). Measuring group climate in a forensic setting. The Prison Journal, 91, 158-177.
39.
Van der HelmG. H. P.StamsG. J. J. M.Van der StelJ. C.Van LangenM. A. M.Van der LaanP. H. (2012) Group climate and empathy in a sample of incarcerated boys. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 1149-1160.
40.
Van der HelmG. H. PVan GenabeekM.StamsG. J. J. Mvan der LaanP. H. (2011). Violence in youth prison: the role of group climate and personality. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23, 23-39.
41.
Van NieuwenhuijzenM.Orobio de CastroB.Van der ValkI.WijnroksL.VermeerA.MatthysW. (2006). Do social information processing models explain aggressive behaviour by children with mild intellectual disabilities in residential care?Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 801-12.
42.
VreugdenhilC.DoreleijersT.VermeirenR.WoutersL.Van den BrinkW. (2004). Psychiatric disorders in a representative sample of incarcerated boys in the Netherlands. American Medical Association, 43, 97-104.
43.
WenarC.KerigP. (2012). Developmental Psychology. Maidenhead, UK: Mac Craw-Hill.
44.
WhiteH. R.ShiJ.HirschfieldP.MunE. I.LoeberE. R. (2009). Effects of institutional confinement for delinquency on levels of anxiety and depression among male adolescents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 295-313.
45.
WikstromP. O. H.ButterworthD. (2006). Adolescent crime: Individual differences and lifestyles. Collumpton, UK: Willan .
46.
YoungM. H.JusticeJ. V.ErdbergP. (1999). Risk factors for violent behavior among incarcerated male psychiatric patients: A multi-method approach. Assessment, 6, 243-258.
47.
ZahnM. A.DayJ. C.MihalicS. F.TichavskyL. (2009). Determining what works for girls in the juvenile justice system. A summary of evaluation evidence. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 266-293.
