“That’s so gay,” a popular expression on campuses, is a sexual orientation microaggression that can contribute to a hostile environment for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) students. Using data from a campus climate survey conducted at a large urban university, we investigated use of the phrase among heterosexual male undergraduates who are emerging adults (18–25 years). Multiple regression analysis suggested that saying the phrase is positively associated with hearing peers say it and with holding negative perceptions of feminine men, whereas having LGB acquaintances was negatively associated with use of this expression. We offer practice and policy recommendations for curbing its use, thereby enhancing campus climate.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
2.
BrownR. D.ClarkeB.GortmakerV.Robinson-KeiligR. (2004). Assessing the campus climate for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) students using a multiple perspectives approach. Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 8-26. doi: 10.1353/csd.2004.0003
3.
BurnS. M. (2000). Heterosexuals’ use of “fag” and “queer” to deride one another: A contributor to heterosexism and stigma. Journal of Homosexuality, 40(2), 1-11. doi: 10.1300/J082v40n02_01
4.
BurnS. M.KadlecK.RexerR. (2005). Effects of subtle heterosexism on gays, lesbians, and bisexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 23-38. doi: 10.1300/J082v49n02_02
5.
ChonodyJ. M.RutledgeS. E.SmithS. (in press). “That’s so gay:” Language use and antigay bias. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services.
6.
FranklinK. (2000). Antigay behaviors among young adults: Prevalence, patterns, and motivators in a noncriminal population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 339-362. doi: 10.1177/088626000015004001
7.
Haider-MarkelD. P.JoslynM. R. (2005). Attributions and the regulation of marriage: Considering the parallels between race and homosexuality. Political Science and Politics, 38, 233–239. doi: 10.1017/S1049096505056362
8.
HarrisF.III (2008). Deconstructing masculinity: A qualitative study of college men’s masculine conceptualizations and gender performance. NASPA Journal, 45, 453-474.
9.
HarrisF.IIIEdwardsK. E. (2010). College men’s experience as men: Findings and implications from two grounded theory studies. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 47(1), 43-62. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.6085
10.
HongL. (2000). Toward a transformed approach to prevention: Breaking the link between masculinity and violence. Journal of American College Health, 48, 269-282. doi: 10.1080/07448480009596268
11.
HopwoodM.ConnorsJ. (2002). Heterosexual attitudes to homosexuality: Homophobia at a rural Australian university. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 14(2), 79-94. doi: 10.1300/J041v14n02_07
12.
JayakumarU. M. (2009). The invisible rainbow in diversity: Factors influencing sexual prejudice among college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 675-700. doi: 10.1080/00918360903054095
13.
JewelL. M.MorrisonM. A. (2010). “But there’s a million jokes about everybody. . . ” Prevalence of, and reasons for, directing negative behaviors toward gay men on a Canadian university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2094-2112. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354499
14.
KieslerC. A.CollinsB. E.MillerN. (1969). Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15.
KimmelM. S. (2010). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In HarperS.R.HarrisF.III (Eds.), College men and masculinities: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 23-31). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
LambertE.VenturaL.HallD.Cluse-TolarT. (2006). College students’ views on gay and lesbian issues. Journal of Homosexuality, 50(4), 1-30. doi: 10.1300/J082v50n04_01
17.
LongerbeamS. D.InkelasK. IJohnsonD. R.LeeZ. S. (2007). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual college student experiences: An exploratory study. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 215-230. doi: 10.1353/csd.2007.0017
18.
NadalK. L.RiveraD. P.CorpusJ. H. (2010). Sexual orientation and transgender microaggressions. In SueD. W. (Ed.), Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact (pp. 217-240). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19.
OlsonL. R.CadgeW.HarrisonJ. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 340–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x
20.
ParkerJ. (2001). Language: A pernicious and powerful tool. The English Journal, 19(2), 74-78.
21.
PelligriniA. (1992). S(h)ifting the terms of heterosexism: Gender, power, and homophobia. In BlumenfeldW. (Ed.), Homophobia: How we all pay the price (pp. 39-56). Boston, MA: Beacon.
22.
RamlowT. R. (2003). Bad boys: Abstractions of difference and the politics of youth “deviance.”CLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 1-2, 107-132. doi: 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-107
23.
RankinS.WeberG.BlumenfeldW.FrazerS. (2010). 2010 State of higher education for Lesbian, gay, bisexual & transgender People. Charlotte, NC: Campus Pride.
24.
SanloR. (2004). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students: Risk, resiliency, and retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(1), 97-110. doi: 10.2190/FH61-VE7V-HHCX-0PUR
25.
SchopeR.EliasonM. (2000). Thinking versus acting. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 11(4), 69-92. doi: 10.1300/J041v11n04_04
26.
SilverschanzP.CortinaL. M.KonikJ.MagleyV. J. (2008). Slurs, snubs, and queer jokes: Incidence and impact of heterosexist harassment in academia. Sex Roles, 58, 179-191. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9329-7
27.
SueD. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. In SueD. W. (Ed.), Microagressions and marginality: Manifestations, dynamics, and impact (pp.184-206). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
28.
SwearerS. M.TurnerR. K.GivensJ. E.PollackW. S. (2008). “You’re so gay!” Do different forms of bullying matter for adolescent males?School Psychology Review, 37, 160-173.
WallsN. E. (2008). Toward a multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 55(1), 20-70. doi:10.1080/ 00918360802129287
31.
WinansA. E. (2006). Queering pedagogy in the English classroom: Engaging with the places where thinking stops. Pedagogy, 6(1), 103-122. doi: 10.1215/15314200-6-1-103
32.
WoodfordM. R.HowellM. L.SilverschanzP.YuL. (2012). “That’s so gay!” Examining the covariates of hearing this expression among gay, lesbian, and bisexual college students. Journal of American College Health, 60(6), 429-434.
33.
WoodfordM. R.KolbC.RadekaG.JavierG. (in press). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender ally training programs on campus: Current variations and future directions. Journal of College Student Development.
