The Effect of Offenders’ Sex on Reporting Crimes to the Police

Abstract

This article examines the difference in victims’ reporting behavior regarding crimes committed by males and by females. The authors expect that victims of female offenders are less likely to report to the police than victims of male offenders because of differences in the victim–offender relationship as well as in the victim’s sex. With recent developments in Bayesian statistics, new tools have become available that enable the direct evaluation of researchers’ expectations. All cases of robbery with assault from the National Crime Victimization Survey have been investigated (n = 478). Findings reveal that female offenders are underreported compared with male offenders and that this can be explained by the victim characteristics but only in combination with the offender’s sex.

Keywords

crime reporting victims sex differences victim–offender relationship robbery with assault

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agresti

(1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1979-2003). National crime (victimization) survey: Criminal victimization in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Feld

B. C.

(2009). Violent girls or relabeled status offenders? An alternative interpretation of the data. Crime Delinquency, 55, 241-265.

Felson

R. B.

Messner

S. F.

Hoskin

A. W.

Deane

(2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40, 617-648.

Felson

R. B.

Paré

P.-P.

(2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstranger to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597-610.

Gartner

Macmillan

(1995). The effect of victim–offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 393-430.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Gottfredson

D. M.

(1988). Decision-making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion. New York, NY: Plenum.

Goudriaan

(2006). Reporting crime: Effects of social context on the decision of victims to notify the police (Doctoral dissertation). Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/4410/Thesis.pdf;jsessionid=A68237AD8AC6938AA9DBBCD5D8DD56F3?sequence=1

Hoijtink

Klugkist

Boelen

P. A.

(Eds.). (2008). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. New York, NY: Springer.

10.

Kaukinen

(2002). The help-seeking decisions of violent crime victims: An examination of the direct and conditional effects of gender and the victim–offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 432-456.

11.

Kruttschnitt

Gartner

Ferraro

(2002). Women’s involvement in serious interpersonal violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 529-565.

12.

Kuiper

R. M.

Hoijtink

(2010). Comparisons of means using exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Psychological Methods, 15, 69-86.

13.

Laudy

Hoijtink

(2007). Bayesian methods for the analysis of inequality constrained contingency tables. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 123-138.

14.

Laudy

Zoccolillo

Baillargeon

Boom

Tremblay

Hoijtink

(2005). Applications of confirmatory latent class analysis in developmental psychology. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 1-15.

15.

Lauritsen

J. L.

Heimer

Lynch

J. P.

(2009). Trends in the gender gap in violent offending: New evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminology, 47, 361-399.

16.

McCart

M. R.

Smith

D. W.

Sawyer

G. K.

(2010). Help seeking among victims of crime: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23, 198-206.

17.

Meeus

Van de Schoot

Keijsers

Schwartz

S. J.

Branje

(2011). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development, 81, 1565-1581.

18.

Putallaz

Bierman

K. L.

(2004). Aggression, antisocial d, and violence among girls: A developmental perspective. New York, NY: Guilford.

19.

Rouwette

van Hooff

Vennix

Jongebreur

(2007). Modeling crime control in the Netherlands: Insights on process. Paper presented at the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, MA.

20.

Singer

S. I.

(1988). The fear of reprisal and the failure of victims to report a personal crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 289-302.

21.

Skogan

W. G.

(1984). Reporting crimes to the police: The status of world research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 113-137.

22.

Steffensmeier

Schwartz

Zhong

Ackerman

(2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls’ violence using diverse longitudinal sources. Criminology, 43, 355-405.

23.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Multiway frequency analysis. Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 219-274). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

24.

Tarling

Morris

(2010). Reporting crime to the police. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 474-490.

25.

Taylor

T. J.

Turner

K. B.

Esbensen

F. A.

Winfree

L. T.

Jr. (2001). Coppin’ an attitude: Attitudinal differences among juveniles toward police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 295-305.

26.

Truman

J. L.

Rand

M. R.

(2010). Criminal Victimization, 2009 (U.S. Department of Justice Report NCJ 231327). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.

27.

Van der Laan

A. M.

Blom

(2006). Jeugddelinquentie: Risico’s en bescherming. Bevindingen uit de WODC Monitor Zelfgerapporteerde Jeugdcriminaliteit [Juvenile delinquency: Risks and protection: Findings from the WODC Monitor self-reported juvenile crime]. In Onderzoek and Beleid (pp. 245). The Hague, Netherlands: WODC/Boom Juridische Uitgeverij.

28.

Van de Schoot

Wong

(2011). Do antisocial young adults have a high or a low level of self-concept? Self and Identity. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.51771310.1080/15298868.2010.517713

29.

Van de Schoot

Hoijtink

Mulder

Van Aken

M. A. G.

Orobio de Castro

Meeus

Romeijn

J.-W.

(2011). Evaluating expectations about negative emotional states of aggressive boys using Bayesian model selection. Developmental Psychology, 47, 203-212.

30.

Van de Schoot

Hoijtink

Romeijn

J.-W.

(2011). Moving beyond traditional null hypothesis testing: Evaluating expectations directly. Frontiers in Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 2(24). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.0002410.3389/fpsyg.2011.00024

31.

Van de Schoot

Hoijtink

Mulder

Van Aken

M. A. G.

Orobio de Castro

Meeus

Romeijn

J.-W.

(2011). Evaluating Expectations about Negative Emotional States of Aggressive Boys using Bayesian Model Selection. Developmental Psychology, 47, 203-212.

32.

Van de Schoot

Strohmeier

(2011). Testing informative hypotheses in SEM increases power: An illustration contrasting classical hypothesis testing with a parametric bootstrap approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 180-190. doi:10.1177/0165025410397432

33.

Van de Schoot

Van der Velden

Boom

Brugman

(2010). Can at Risk Young Adolescents be Popular and Antisocial? Sociometric Status Groups, AntiSocial Behavior, Gender and Ethnic Background. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 583–592.