Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners’ Perceptions of Their Relationship With Doctors,Rape Victim Advocates,Police,and Prosecutors

Abstract

In response to the negative and inefficient treatment of rape victims by emergency room personnel, the first Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) programs began in the late 1970s. While SANEs, doctors, rape victim advocates, police officers and prosecutors work together to ensure the most comprehensive and sensitive care of rape victims, they all have very different roles and objectives. This research explores SANEs’ perceptions of their relationships with other professionals who treat or interact with rape victims. Data from interviews with 39 Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners from four East Coast states indicate positive relationships are marked by open communication, respect shown towards SANEs as well as rape victims, and a sense of appreciation among SANEs. On the contrary, negative relationships result when SANEs believe police treat victims poorly, when advocates overstep boundaries and question SANEs about evidence collection or the exam, and when prosecutors fail to properly prepare them to testify during a trial.

Keywords

sexual assault intervention reporting/disclosure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmann

(2002). Developing cultural competence in health care settings. Pediatric Nursing, 28(2), 133-137.

Antognoli-Toland

(1985). Comprehensive program for examination of sexual assault victims by nurses: A hospital-based project in Texas. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 11(3), 132-136.

Bechtel

Ryan

Gallagher

(2008). Impact of sexual assault nurse examiners on the evaluation of sexual assault in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 24, 442-447.

Bernard

H. R.

Ryan

G. W.

(2010). Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Brown

(2010). Forensic nursing in the emergency department. In Riviello

(Ed.), Manual of forensic emergency medicine: A guide for clinicians (pp. 4-9). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

Campbell

(2005). What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence & Victims, 20, 55-68.

Campbell

Bybee

(1997). Emergency medical services for sexual assault victims: Detecting the cracks in service delivery. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 3, 75-101.

Campbell

Bybee

Ford

J. K.

Patterson

(2008). Systems change analysis of SANE programs: Identifying the mediating mechanisms of criminal justice system impact. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ccasa.org/documents/Campbell%20study-SANE%20and%20CJS.pdf

Campbell

Long

S. M.

Townsend

S. M.

Kinnison

K. E.

Pulley

E. M.

Adames

S. B.

Wasco

S. M.

(2007). Sexual assault nurse examiners’ experiences providing expert witness court testimony. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 3(1), 7-14.

10.

Campbell

Patterson

Bybee

Dworkin

E. R.

(2009). Predicting sexual assault prosecution outcomes: The role of medical forensic evidence collected by sexual assault nurse examiners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 712-727.

11.

Campbell

Patterson

Lichty

L. F.

(2005). The effectiveness of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 313-329.

12.

Campbell

Raja

(2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences in military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97-106.

13.

Campbell

Townsend

S. M.

Long

S. M.

Kinnison

K. E.

Pulley

E. M.

Adames

S. B.

Wasco

S. M.

(2005). Organizational characteristics of sexual assault nurse examiner programs: Results from the national survey of SANE programs. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 1, 57-64.

14.

Campbell

Wasco

S. M.

Ahrens

C. E.

Sefl

Barnes

H. E.

(2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239-1259.

15.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010a). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System [online]. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/ default.htm.

16.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010b). 20 leading causes of nonfatal violence-related injury, United States. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfilead2001.html

17.

Ciancone

Wilson

Collette

Gerson

L. W.

(2000). Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs in the United States. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 35, 353-357.

18.

Cole

(2011). Victim confidentiality on Sexual Assault Response Teams (SART). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26 (2), 360-376.

19.

Cole

Logan

T. K.

(2008). Negotiating the challenges of multidisciplinary responses to sexual assault victims: Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner and victim advocacy programs. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 76-85.

20.

Cole

Logan

T. K.

(2010). Interprofesssional collaboration on Sexual Assault Response Teams (SART): The role of victim alcohol use and a partner-perpetrator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 336-357.

21.

Corbin

Strauss

(2008). Basics of Qualitative Research, 3/e. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

22.

Crandall

Helitzer

(2003). Impact evaluation of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) program (NCJ 203276). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

23.

Derhammer

Lucente

Reed

J. F.

Young

M. J.

(2000). Using a SANE interdisciplinary approach to care for sexual assault victims. Journal on Quality Improvement, 26, 488-495.

24.

DiNitto

Martin

P. Y.

Norton

Maxwell

(1986). After sexual assault: Who should examine sexual assault survivors? American Journal of Nursing, 86, 538-540.

25.

Du Mont

Parnis

(2003). Forensic nursing in the context of sexual assault: Comparing the opinions and practices of nurse examiners and nurses. Applied Nursing Research, 16, 173-183.

26.

Du Mont

White

McGregor

M. J.

(2009). Investigating the medical forensic examination from the perspectives of sexually assaulted women. Social Sciences & Medicine, 68, 774-780.

27.

Edward

Macleod

(1999). The reality and myth of rape: Implications for the criminal justice system. Expert Evidence, 7, 37-58.

28.

Emergency Nurses Association. (2007). Care of sexual assault and rape victims in the emergency department. Retrieved from http://ena.org/about/position/position/Sexual_Assault_and_Rape_Victims_-_ENA_White_Paper.pdf

29.

Estrich

(1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

30.

Flavin

(2001). Feminism for the mainstream criminologist: An Invitation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 271-285.

31.

Girardin

B. W.

(2005). The sexual assault nurse examiner: A win-win solution. Topics in Emergency Medicine, 27(2), 124-131.

32.

Holmes

M. M.

Resnick

H. S.

Frampton

(1998). Follow-up of sexual assault victims. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 179, 336-342.

33.

Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (2003, December). The Efficacy of Illinois’ Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Pilot Program. Chicago, IL: Author.

34.

International Association of Forensic Nursing. (2010). Clinical Forensic Program Registry. Retrieved from http://www.iafn.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=141

35.

Konradi

(2007). Taking the stand: Rape survivors and the prosecution of rapists. Westport, CT: Praeger.

36.

Ledray

(1999). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) development & operation guide. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice.

37.

Ledray

(2010). Expanding evidence collection time: Is it time to move beyond the 72-hour rule? How do we decide? Journal of Forensic Nursing, 6, 47-50.

38.

Ledray

Faugno

Speck

(2001). SANE: Advocate, forensic technician, nurse? Journal of Emergency Nursing, 27, 91-93.

39.

Ledray

Simmelink

(1997). Efficacy of SANE evidence collection: A Minnesota study. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 23, 75-77.

40.

Lewis

C. M.

DiNitto

Nelson

T. S.

Just

M. M.

Campbell-Ruggaard

(2003). Evaluation of a rape protocol: A five year follow-up with nurse managers. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 15(1), 34-39.

41.

Littel

(2001). Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANE) Programs: Improving the community response to sexual assault victims. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime.

42.

Logan

T. K.

Cole

Capillo

(2007). Sexual assault nurse examiner program characteristics, barriers, and lessons learned. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 3(1), 24-34.

43.

Madigan

Gamble

(1991). The second rape: Society’s continued betrayal of the victim. New York, NY: Lexington Books.

44.

Maier

(2008). “I have heard horrible stories . . .” Rape advocates’ perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence Against Women, 14, 786-808.

45.

Martin

P. Y.

DiNitto

(1987). The sexual assault exam: Beyond the hospital emergency room. Women’s Health, 12, 5-28.

46.

McGregor

M. J.

Du Mont

Myhr

T. L.

(2002). Sexual assault forensic medical examination: Is evidence related to successful prosecution? Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39, 639-647.

47.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

(1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2/e. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

48.

Nugent-Borakove

M. E.

Fanflik

Troutman

Johnson

Burgess

O’Connor

A. L.

(2006). Testing the efficacy of SANE/SART programs: Do they make a difference in sexual assault arrest & prosecution outcomes? Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

49.

O’Brien

(1996). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program coordinator. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 22, 532-533.

50.

Page

A. D.

(2008a). Gateway to reform? Policy implications of police officers’ attitudes toward rape. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 44-58.

51.

Page

A. D.

(2008b). Judging women and defining crime: Police officers’ attitudes toward women and rape. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 389-411.

52.

Patterson

Campbell

Townsend

S. M.

(2006). Sexual assault nurse examiner programs’ goals and patient care practices. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 38, 180-186.

53.

Pennington

E. C.

Zwemer

F. L.

Krebs

(2008). Unique sexual assault examiner program utilizing mid-level providers. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(1), 95-98.

54.

Plichta

S. B.

Clements

P.T.

Houseman

(2007). Why SANEs matter: Models of care for sexual violence victims in the emergency department. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 3(1), 15-23.

55.

Preston

L. D.

(2003). The Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner and the rape crisis advocate: A necessary partnership. Topics in Emergency Medicine, 25, 242-246.

56.

Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network. (2009). Confidentiality laws. Retrieved from http://www.rainn.org/public-policy/sexual-assault-issues/confidentiality-laws

57.

Scalzo

(2006). Tips for testifying as an expert witness in a violence against women prosecution. Voice, 1(6). American Prosecutors Research Institute’s National Center for the Prosecution of the Violence Against Women: Alexandria, VA.

Retrieved December 29, 2008

http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/the_voice_vol_1_no_6_2006.pdf

58.

Seng

J. S.

Sanubol

, & Johnson County (Iowa) SANE Team. (2004). The first year as Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner: Role transition and role-related stress within a new SANE team. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 30(2), 126-133.

59.

Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner, Sexual Assault Response Team. (2010). SANE program locator. Retrieved from http://www.sane-sart.com/staticpages/index.php?page=20031023141144274

60.

Speck

Aiken

(1995). 20 years of community nursing service. Tennessee Nurse,58(2), 15-18.

61.

Stermac

L. E.

Stirpe

T. S.

(2002). Efficacy of a 2-year-old sexual assault nurse examiner program in a Canadian hospital. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 28, 18-23.

62.

Stevens

(2004). Forensic nurse: The new role of the nurse in law enforcement. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

63.

Taylor

W. K.

(2002). Collecting evidence for sexual assault: The role of the sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 78(Suppl. 1), S91-S94.

64.

Townsend

S. M.

Campbell

(2009). Organizational correlates of secondary traumatic stress and burnout among sexual assault nurse examiners. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 5(2), 97-106.

65.

U.S. Department of Justice. (1995). Report to Congress: The confidentiality of communications between sexual assault or domestic violence victims and their counselors. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/169588.pdf