This study reports a grounded theory study of the process of how children tell of their experiences of child sexual abuse from the perspectives of young people and their parents. Individual interviews were conducted with 22 young people aged 8 to 18, and 14 parents. A theoretical model was developed that conceptualises the process of disclosure as one of containing the secret of child sexual abuse. Three key dynamics were identified: the active withholding of the secret on the part of the child, the experience of a ‘pressure cooker effect’ reflecting a conflict between the wish to tell and the wish to keep the secret, and the confiding itself which often occurs in the context of an intimacy being shared. Children’s experiences of disclosure were multidetermined and suggest the need for multifaceted and multisystemic approaches to prevention and intervention. The need for the secret to be contained, individually and interpersonally in appropriate safeguarding and therapeutic contexts needs to be respected in helping children tell.
BentovimA. (2002). Developmental identity disorder: A developmental perspective. In SinasonV. (Ed.), Attachment, trauma and multiplicity. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
5.
BusseyK.GrimbeekE. J. (1995). Disclosure processes: Issues for child sexual abuse victims. In RotenbergK. T. (Ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp. 166-203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
CollingsS. J.GriffithsS.KumaloM. (2005). Patterns of disclosure in child sexual abuse. South African Journal of Psychology, 35, 270-285.
8.
Coulborn FallerK. (2007). Interviewing children about sexual abuse: Controversies and best practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
CrismaM.BascelliE.PaciD.RomitoP. (2004). Adolescents who experienced sexual abuse: Fears, needs and impediments to disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 1035-1048.
10.
DiPietroE. K.RunyanD. K.FredricksonD. D. (1997). Predictors of disclosure during medical evaluation for suspected sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1(6), 133-142.
11.
FarrellL. G. (1988). Factors that affect a victim’s self-disclosure in father–daughter incest. Child Welfare, 67, 462–468.
12.
FinkelhorD.BrowneA. (1985). The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: A conceptualisation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, 530-541.
13.
FriedrichsW. N. (2002). Psychological assessment of sexually abused children and their families. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
FurnissT. (1990). The multiprofessional handbook of child sexual abuse. London, UK: Routledge.
15.
GoodeH.McGeeH.O’BoyleC. (2003). Time to listen: Confronting child sexual abuse by catholic clergy in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: Liffey Press.
16.
Goodman-BrownT. B.EdelsteinR. S.GoodmanG. S.JonesD. P. H.GordonD. S. (2003). Why children tell: A model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 525-540.
HershkowitzI.HorowitzD.LambM. E. (2005). Trends in children’s disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1203-1214.
19.
HershkowitzI.LanesO.LambM. E. (2007). Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged victims and their parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 111-123.
20.
HershkowitzI.OrbachY.LambM. E.SternbergK. J.HorowitzD. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 753-769.
21.
JensenT. K.GulbrandsenW.MossigeS.ReicheltS.TjerslandO. A. (2005). Reporting possible sexual abuse: A qualitative study on children’s perspectives and the context for disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1395-1413.
22.
JonesD. (2000). Editorial: Disclosure of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 269-271.
23.
KearyK.FitzpatrickC. (1994). Children’s disclosure of sexual abuse during formal investigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 543-548.
24.
KoganS. M. (2004). Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: Results from a national sample of adolescent women. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 147-165.
25.
LalorK.McElvaneyR. (2010). Child sexual abuse, links to later sexual exploitation/high risk sexual behavior and prevention/treatment programmes. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 11, 159-177.
26.
LawsonL.ChaffinM. (1992). False negatives in sexual abuse disclosure interviews: Incidence and influence of caretaker’s belief in abuse in cases of accidental abuse discovery by diagnosis of STD. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 532-542.
27.
LondonK.BruckM.CeciS. J.ShumanD. W. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 194-226.
28.
LondonK.BruckM.CeciS. J.ShumanD. W. (2007). Disclosures of child sexual abuse: A review of the contemporary empirical literature. In PipeM. E.LambM.OrbachY.CederborgA. C. (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial (pp. 11-40). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
LovettB. (2004). Child sexual abuse disclosure: Maternal response and other factors impacting the victim. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21, 355-371.
30.
MalloyL. C.LindsayC.LyonT. D.QuasJ. A. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 162-170.
31.
MayockP.KitchingK.MorganM. (2007). RSE in the context of SPHE: An assessment of the challenges to full implementation of the programme in post-primary schools. Dublin, Ireland: Crisis Pregnancy Agency/Department of Education and Science.
32.
McElvaneyR. (2002). Delays in reporting childhood sexual abuse and implications for legal proceedings. In FarringtonD. P.HollinC. R.McMurranM. (Eds.), Sex and violence: The psychology of crime and risk assessment (pp. 138-153). London, UK: Routledge.
33.
McGeeH.GaravanR.deBarraM.ByrneJ.ConroyR. (2002). The SAVI report: Sexual abuse and violence in Ireland. Dublin: The Liffey Press.
34.
MudalyN.GoddardC. (2006). The truth is longer than a lie: Children’s experiences of abuse and professional interventions. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
35.
PipeM. E.LambM. E.OrbachY.StewartH.SternbergK. J.EsplinP. (2007). Factors associated with nondisclosure of suspected abuse during forensic interviews. In PipeM. E.LambM. E.OrbachY.CederborgA. C. (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial (pp. 77-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
PriebeG.SvedinC. G. (2008). Child sexual abuse is largely hidden from the adult society: An epidemiological study of adolescents’ disclosures. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1095-1108.
RoeslerT. A.WindT. W. (1994). Telling the secret: Adult women describe their experiences of incest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 327-338.
39.
RogersA. G. (2006). The unsayable: The hidden language of trauma. New York, NY: Random House.
40.
SmithD. W.LetourneauE. J.SaundersB. E.KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S.BestC. L. (2000). Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: Results from a national survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 273-287.
41.
SorensonT.SnowB. (1991). How children tell: The process of disclosure of child sexual abuse. Child Welfare, 70, 3-15.
42.
SperryD. M.GilbertB. O. (2005). Child peer sexual abuse: Preliminary data on outcomes and disclosure experiences. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 889-904.
43.
StallerK. M.Nelson-GardellD. (2005). “A burden in your heart”: Lessons of disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1415-1432.
44.
SternbergK. J.LambM. E.DaviesG. M.WestcottH. L. (2001). The Memorandum of good practice: Theory versus application. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(5), 669-681.
45.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
SummitR. (1983). The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 177-193.
47.
ToukmanianS. G.BrouwersM. C. (1998). Cultural aspects of self-disclosure and psychotherapy. In KazarianS. S.EvansD. R. (Eds.), Cultural clinical psychology: Theory, research and practice (pp. 106-126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
