Group work with men who batter has traditionally consisted predominantly of psychoeducational programs that ignore concepts such as self-determination, goal setting, and positive engagement with men. More recently, this paradigm has begun to shift to include cognitive approaches and the utilization of strength-based strategies. The present sample included 42 men who were part of an ongoing batterer intervention program. Information for this study included assessment of each man’s strengths, their goals, and their perceptions of the changes they felt they had already made prior to attending group treatment. Through a grounded theory analysis, a model was developed that highlights the pretherapeutic change processes that men experience due to their being arrested, charged with a misdemeanour domestic charge, and subsequently convicted of domestic violence. Particularly highlighted are changes in the ways that men view and navigate three distinct areas of their lives: their external world (including work and education); their internal world (perception of self, values, and skills); and their interpersonal relationships with their partner and children.
Adams, D. ( 1988). Treatment models of men who batter: A profeminist analysis . In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), National conference for family violence researchers (pp.176-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
Brodeur, N., Rondeau, G., Brochu, S., Lindsay, J., & Phelps, J. ( 2008). Does the transtheoretical model predict attrition in domestic violence treatment programs? Violence and Victims , 23, 493-507.
3.
Bograd, M. ( 1984). Family systems approaches to wife battering: A feminist critique. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 558-568.
4.
Bograd, M. ( 1988). How battered women and abusive men account for domestic violence: Excuses, justifications, or explanations. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 60-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
Charmaz, K. ( 2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
Charmaz, K. ( 2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: SAGE.
7.
Daniels, J.W., & Murphy, C.M. ( 1997). Stages and processes of change in batterers’ treatment . Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 4(1), 123-145.
8.
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R. ( 1979). Violence against women. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
Dutton, D.G., & Hemphill, K.J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault. Violence and Victims, 7, 29-39. Eckhardt, C.I., Babcock, J., & Homack, S. (2004). Partner assaultive men and the stages and processes of change. Journal of Family Violence, 19(2), 81-93. Eckhardt, C., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Norlander, B., Sibley, A., & Cahill, M. ( 2008). Readiness to change, partner violence subtypes, and treatment outcomes among men in treatment for partner assault. Violence and Victims, 23, 446-475. Edleson, J.L. (1990). Judging the success of interventions with men who batter. In D. J. Besharov (Ed.), Family violence: Research and public policy issues. (pp. 130-145). Washington, DC: US: AEI Press.
10.
Edleson, J.L. ( 1996). Controversy and change in batterers’ programs. In J. L. Edleson & J. C. Eisikovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families (pp. 154-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Gondolf, E.W., & Russell, D. ( 1986). The case against anger control treatment programs for batterers. Response, 9, 2-5.
Lee, M.Y., Uken, A., & Sebold, J. ( 2004). Accountability for solutions: Solution-focused treatment with domestic violence offenders. Families in Society, 85, 463-476.
14.
Lee, M.Y., Uken, A., & Sebold, J. ( 2007). Role of self-determined goals in predicting recidivism in domestic violence offenders. Research on Social Work Practice , 17, 30-41. Lehmann , P. (2007). The strengths questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas.
15.
Lehmann, P. ( 2008). Writing about the benefits of my experience questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Arlington , Arlington, Texas.
16.
Lehmann, P., & Simmons, C. ( 2009). The state of batterer intervention programs: An analytical discussion. In P. Lehmann & C. Simmons (Eds.) Strength-Based Batterer Intervention: A New Paradigm in Ending Family Violence (pp. 3-37). New York, NY: Springer.
17.
McCullough, M.E., Root, L.M., & Cohen, A.D. ( 2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887-897.
18.
Mills, L.G. ( 2008). Violent partners: A breakthrough plan for ending the cycle of violence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19.
Milner, J. ( 2004). From "disappearing" to "demonized": The effects on men and women of professional intervention based on challenging men who are violent . Critical Social Policy, 24, 79-101.
20.
Milner, J., & Singleton, T. ( 2008). Solution-focused practice with men and women who are violent. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 29-53.
21.
Minnesota Program Development, Inc. (2007). The Duluth model. Retrieved September 28, 2009, http://www.duluth-model.org/
22.
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. ( 1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model . New York, NY: Springer.
23.
Pressman, B. ( 1989). Power and ideological issues in intervening with assaulted women. In B. Pressman, G. Cameron, & M. Rothery (Eds.), Intervening with assaulted women: Current theory, research, and practice (pp. 9-20). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Serran, G., & Firestone, P. ( 2004). Intimate partner homicide: A review of the male proprietariness and the self-defense theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior , 9, 1-15.
26.
Scott, K.L. ( 2004). Stage of change as a predictor of attrition among men in a batterer treatment program. Journal of Family Violence , 19(1), 37-47.
27.
Scott, K.L., & Wolfe, D.A. ( 2003). Readiness to change as a predictor of outcome in batterer treatment. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology , 71, 879-889.
28.
Sterba, J. P. (Ed.). (2008). Does feminism discriminate against men?A debate. Point/ counterpoint series. New York, NY: Oxford.
29.
Wexler, D.B. ( 2000). Domestic violence 2000: An integrated skills program for men. Group leaders manual: An integrated skills program for men. New York, NY: Norton.
