The present study investigated the factor structure and reliability of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales’ (CTS2) 10-factor model in a community-based female sample (N = 261). The underlying factor structure of the 10-factor model was tested by the confirmatory multiple group factor analysis, which demonstrated complex factor cross-loadings across the subscales for both perpetration and victimization. This confirmatory factor analysis also identified a lack of exclusive factor loadings between minor and severe distinctions of the eight violence measures. Internal consistency of the subscales was generally acceptable (.68-.85 for perpetration and .68-.84 for victimization), except for the Sexual Coercion subscale; the alpha coefficients of the Sexual Coercion Minor subscale were .18 for perpetration and .37 for victimization. Practical implications related to complex factor cross-loadings and internal consistency were discussed.
Archer, J. ( 2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Review, 126, 651-680.
2.
Berk, R.A., Berk, S.F., Loseke, D.R., & Rauma, D. ( 1983). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 197-212). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Bernstein, I.H., Jaremko, M.E., & Hinkely, B.S. ( 1994). On the utility of the SCL-90-R with low-back pain patients . Spine, 19, 42-48.
4.
Bernstein, I.H., & Keith, J.B. ( 1991). Reexamination of Eisen, Sellman, and McAlister’s Health Belief Model Questionnaire. Health Education Quarterly , 18, 207-220.
5.
Bogard, M. ( 1984). Family systems approaches to wife battering: A feminist critique. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 558-568.
6.
Brown, T.A. ( 2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guildford.
7.
Bryant, R.B., & Yarnold, P.R. ( 1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. Grimm & P. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
Calvete, E., Corral, S., & Estevéz, A. (2007). Factor structure and validity of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Spanish women. Violence Against Women, 13, 1072-1087.
9.
Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., & Vivian, D. ( 1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 1178-1184.
10.
Cattell, R.B. ( 1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavior and life sciences. New York: Plenum .
11.
Chang, V.N. ( 1996). I just lost myself: Psychological abuse of women in marriage . New York: Praeger.
12.
Connelly, C.D., Newton, R.R., & Aarons, G.A. ( 2005). A psychometric examination of English and Spanish versions of the revised Conflicts Tactics Scales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1560-1579.
13.
Cronbach, L.J. ( 1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests . Psychomerika, 16, 297-334.
14.
Crowley, S.L., & Fan, X. ( 1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 508-531.
15.
DeKeseredy, W.S., Saunders, D.G., Schwartz, M.D., & Alvi, S. ( 1997). The meanings and motives for women’s use of violence in Canadian college dating relationships: Results from a national survey. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 199-222.
16.
Dekeseredy, W.S., & Schwartz, M.D. (1998, February). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales (Applied Research Forum, National Electonic Network on Violence Against Women). Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http://www.vaw.umn.edu/research.asp
17.
Desai, S., & Saltzman, L.E. (2001). Measurement issues for violence against women. In C. M. Renzetti , J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 35-52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. ( 1984). The nature and antecedents of violent events. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 269-288.
19.
Dobash, R.P., Dobash, R.E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. ( 1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
20.
Ellis, D., & Stuckless, N. ( 1996). Mediating and negotiating marital conflicts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Everitt, B.S. ( 1975). Multivariate analysis: The need for data and other problems . British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 237-240.
22.
Gelles, R.J. ( 1991). Physical violence, child abuse, and child homicide: A continuum of violence, or distinct behaviours?Human Nature , 2, 59-72.
Hamby, S.L., & Sugarman, D.B. (1999). Acts of psychological aggression against a partner and their relation to physical assault and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 959-970.
27.
Hyden, M. ( 1995). Verbal aggression as a prehistory of woman battering . Journal of Family violence, 10, 55-71.
28.
Johnson, M.L. ( 2003). Lose something?Ways to find your missing data. Retrieved July 9, 2008, from http://www.hsrd.houston.med.va.gov/Documents/MJ%20Missing%20Data%20PDS%20091703.ppt
29.
Johnson, M.P. ( 1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family , 57, 283-294.
30.
Jones, N.T., Ji, P., Beck, M., & Beck, N. ( 2002). The reliability and validity of the revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) in a female incarcerated population. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 441-457.
31.
Kelly, L. ( 1987). The continuum of sexual violence. In J. Hanmer & M. Maynard (Eds.), Women, violence and social control (pp. 46-60). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
32.
Kirkwood, C. ( 1993). Leaving abusive partners. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Kimmel, M.S. ( 2002). Gender symmetry in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
34.
Kline, P. ( 1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
35.
Lucente, S.W., Fals-Stewart, W., Richards, H.J., & Goscha, J. ( 2001). Factor structure and reliability of the revised conflict tactics scales for incarcerated female substance abusers. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 437-450.
36.
MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. ( 1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
37.
Newton, R.R., Connelly, C.D., & Landsverk, J.A. (2001). An examination of measurement characteristics and factorial validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 317-335.
38.
Nunnally, J.C. ( 1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
O’Leary, K.D., & Williams, M.C. (2006). Agreement about acts of aggression in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 656-662.
41.
Rutherford, A., Zwi, A.B., Grove, N.J., & Butchart, A. ( 2007). Violence: A glossary. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61, 676-680.
42.
Ryan, K.M. ( 1995). Do courtship-violent men have characteristics associated with a "battering personality." Journal of Family Violence , 10, 99-120.
43.
Stets, J., & Henderson, D. ( 1991). Contextual factors surrounding conflict resolution while dating: Results from a national study. Family Relations, 40, 29-36.
44.
Straus, M.A. ( 1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
45.
Straus, M.A. ( 1990). Injury and frequency of assault and the "representative sample fallacy" in measuring wife beating and child abuse. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 75-91). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
46.
Straus, M.A. ( 2006, February). Bibliography of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) and the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC). Retrieved October 9, 2008, from http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/CTS48%20CTS2%20%20and%20CTSPC%20BLIOGRAPHY%202.pdf
47.
Straus, M.A., Hamby, S., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. ( 1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues , 17, 283-316.
48.
Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., & Warren, W.L. ( 2003). The Conflict Tactics Scales handbook: Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) CTS: Parent-Child version (CTSPC). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
49.
Vega, E.M., & O’Leary, K.D. (2007). Test-retest reliability of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Violence, 22, 703-708.
50.
Wardell, L., Gillespie, D.L., & Leffler, A. ( 1983). Science and violence against wives. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles , G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 69-84). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
Yuan, K., Marshall, L.L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 2002). A unified approach to exploratory factor analysis with missing data, nonnormal data, and in the presence of outliers. Psychometrika, 6, 95-121.
