This study analyzed whether police attitudes toward policing partner violence against women corresponded with different psychosocial profiles. Two attitudes toward policing partner violence were considered—one reflecting a general preference for a conditional law enforcement (depending on the willingness of the victim to press charges against the offender) and the other reflecting a general preference for unconditional law enforcement (regardless of the victim’s willingness to press charges against the offender). Results from a sample of 378 police officers showed that those police officers who expressed a general preference for unconditional law enforcement scored higher in other-oriented empathy, were less sexist, tended to perceive the same incidents of partner violence as more serious, and felt more personally responsible, as compared to the group of police officers who expressed a preference for a conditional law enforcement approach. Implications for police education are considered.
Apsler, R., Cummins, M.R., & Carl, S. ( 2003). Perceptions of the police by female victims of domestic partner violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 1318-1335.
2.
Avakame, E.F., & Fyfe, J.J. ( 2001). Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence: Additional evidence on the leniency thesis. Violence Against Women, 7, 22-45.
3.
Batson, C.D. ( 1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. II, pp. 282-316). New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Belknap, J. ( 1995). Law enforcement officers’ attitudes about the appropriate responses to woman battering. International Review of Victimology , 4, 47-62.
5.
Buzawa, E.S., & Buzawa, C.G. ( 1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Coulter, M., Kuehnle, K., Byers, R., & Alfonso, M. ( 1999). Police-reporting behavior and victim-police interactions as described by women in a domestic violence shelter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1290-1298.
7.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. ( 1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
8.
Dalbert, C., Lipkus, I.M., Sallay, H., & Goch, I. ( 2001). A just and an unjust world: Structure and validity of different world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences , 30, 561-577.
9.
DeJong, C., Burguess-Proctor, A., & Elis, L. ( 2008). Police officer perceptions of intimate partner violence: An analysis of observational data. Violence and Victims, 23, 683-697.
10.
Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. ( 1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos [Ambivalent sexism: Measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159-169.
11.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. ( 2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
12.
Felson, R.B., & Ackerman, J. ( 2001). Arrest for domestic and other assaults. Criminology, 39, 655-675.
13.
Felson, R.B., Messner, S.F., Hoskin, A.W., & Deane, G. ( 2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40, 617-647.
14.
García, J.F., Pascual, J., Frías, M.D., Van Krunckelsven, D., & Murgui, S. ( 2008). Design and power analysis: n and confidence intervals of means. Psicothema, 20, 933-938.
15.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. ( 1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 70, 491-512.
16.
Gracia, E. ( 2009). The context of domestic violence: Social and contextual factors associated with partner violence against women. In K. S. Pearlman (Ed.), Marriage: Roles, stability and conflict. New York: Nova Science .
17.
Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. ( 2006a). Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 123-129.
18.
Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. ( 2006b). Public attitudes toward reporting partner violence against women and reporting behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family , 68, 759-768.
19.
Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. ( 2007). Perceived neighborhood social disorder and attitudes toward reporting domestic violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 737-752.
20.
Gracia, E., García, F., & Lila, M. ( 2008). Police involvement in cases of intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility . Violence Against Women, 14, 697-714.
21.
Gracia, E., García, F., & Lila, M. ( 2009). Public responses to intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 648-656.
22.
Instituto de la Mujer. (2003). La violencia contra las mujeres. Resultados de la macroencuesta. II Parte [Violence against women: Results from the macrosurvey, Part II]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
23.
Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. ( 1979). The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) [Updated October 8, 2008]. Available from http: //www.healthpsych.de
24.
Jordan, C. ( 2004). Intimate partner violence and the justice system: An examination of the interface. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 19, 1412-1434.
25.
Lerner, M.J. ( 1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
Loseke, D.R. ( 1989). "Violence" is "violence" . . . or is it? The social construction of "wife abuse" and public policy. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 191-206). New York: de Gruyter .
28.
Maxwell, C.D., Garner, J.H., & Fagan, J.A. ( 2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
29.
Miller, J., & Bukva, K. ( 2001). Intimate violence perceptions: Young adults’ judgments of abuse escalating from verbal arguments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 133-150.
30.
Muehlenhard, C.L., & Kimes, L.A. ( 1999). The social construction of violence: The case of sexual and domestic violence. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 3, 234-245.
31.
Penner, L.A. ( 2002). The causes of sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447-468.
Penner, L.A., Fritzsche, B.A., Craiger, J.P., & Freifeld, T.R. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. Butcher & C. D. Spieiberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 147-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Rebovich, D.J. ( 1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In E. Buzawa & C. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Robinson, A.L., & Chandek, M.S. ( 2000). The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime and Delinquency , 46, 18-37.
36.
Sadusky, J. ( 2001, August). Working effectively with the police: A guide for battered women’s advocates. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://www.vaw.umn.edu/documents/bwjp/policev/policev.html
37.
Saunders, D.G., & Size, P.B. ( 1986). Attitudes about woman abuse among police officers, victims, and victim advocates. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 25-42.
38.
Saunders, D.G. ( 1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 147-158.
39.
Schroeder, D.A., Penner, L.A., Dovidio, J.F., & Piliavin, J.A. (1995). The psychology of helping and altruism. New York: McGraw-Hill .
40.
Schuller, R.A., & Stewart, A. ( 2000). Police responses to sexual assault complaints: The role of perpetrator/complainant intoxication. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 535-551.
Smeenk, W., & Malsch, M. (Eds.). (2005). Family violence and police response: Learning from research, policy and practice in European countries . Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
43.
Sorenson, S.B., & Taylor, C.A. ( 2005). Female aggression toward male intimate partners: An examination of social norms in a community-based sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 78-96.
44.
Stalans, L.J., & Finn, M.A. ( 2000). Gender and socialization: How women and men police officers handle domestic violence. Women and Criminal Justice, 11, 1-24.
45.
Stalans, L.J., & Finn, M.A. ( 2006). Public’s and police officer’s interpretation and handling of domestic violence cases: Divergent realities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1129-1155.
46.
Stephens, B., & Sinden, P. ( 2000). Victims’ voices: Domestic assault victims’ perceptions of police demeanor. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 15, 534-547.
47.
Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K.C. ( 1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe- Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.
48.
Weiner, B. ( 1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186-200.
