This article reports a study of the possible impact of immigration on interactional aspects of intimate partner violence (IPV) among help-seeking women. Are there differences concerning (a) IPV categories, (b) IPV severity, frequency, duration, regularity, and predictability, (c) guilt and shame, (d) partners’ ethnicity, and (e) children being exposed to interparental IPV, adjusted for sociodemographic variables? A representative sample of IPV help-seeking women (N = 157) recruited from family counseling, police, and shelters in Norway were interviewed. Multivariate analyses showed that immigrant women had lower income, were less likely to use alcohol and had increased likelihood of having an immigrant partner. No differences were found concerning IPV severity, frequency, guilt, shame, or victimization pertaining to different IPV categories. Immigrant women were better at predicting physical IPV but had an increased risk of physical injury related to sexual IPV. Children’s risk of being exposed to interparental IPV increased if parents were immigrants. Psychosocial consequences of being an immigrant such as having a lower sociodemographic rank rather than IPV aspects constituted the main difference between ethnic Norwegian and immigrant help-seeking women.
Andreassen, K. ( 2007). Rekordstor vekst i innvandrerbefolkningen (Population, immigration, and emigration). Oslo-Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
2.
Archer, J. ( 2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
3.
Archer, J. ( 2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 133-153.
4.
Arriaga, W.B., & Capezza, N.M. ( 2005). Targets of partner violence: The importance of understanding coping trajectories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 89-99.
5.
Bjørkly, S. ( 1993). Scale for the prediction of aggression and dangerousness in psychotic patients: An introduction. Psychological Reports , 73, 1363-1377.
6.
Briere, J., & Jordan, C.E. ( 2004). Violence against women: Outcome complexity and implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 19, 1252-1276.
7.
Caetano, R., Schafer, J., Clark, C.L., Cunradi, C.B., & Raspberry, K. ( 2000). Intimate partner violence, acculturation, and alcohol consumption among Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 30-45.
8.
Cano, A., & Vivian, D. ( 2001). Life stressors and husband-to-wife violence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 6, 459-480.
9.
Fottrell, E. ( 1980). A study of violent behaviour among patients in psychiatric hospitals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 216-221.
10.
Funder, D.C. ( 2006). Towards a revolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality , 40, 21-34.
11.
Haaland, T., Clausen, S.E., & Schei, B. ( 2005). Couple violence - different perspectives. Results from the first national survey in Norway. (Rep. No. NIBRrapport 2005:3). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research.
12.
Hall, E.T. ( 1998). The power of hidden differences. In M. J. Bennet (Ed.), Basic concepts of intercultural communication (pp. 53-68). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
13.
Hampton, R.L., & Gelles, R.J. ( 1994). Violence against Black women in a nationally representative sample of Black families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies , 51, 105-119.
14.
Hay-Yahia, M.M. ( 2002). Attitudes of Arab women toward different patterns of coping with wife abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 17, 748.
15.
Heckert, D.A., & Gondolf, E.W. ( 2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778-800.
16.
Hicks, M.H.R. ( 2006). The prevalence and characteristics of intimate partner violence in a community study of ChineseAmerican women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1249-1269.
17.
Hien, D., & Ruglass, L. ( 2008). Interpersonal partner violence and women in the United States: An overview of prevalence rates, psychiatric correlates and consequences and barriers to help seeking. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 48-55.
18.
Jensen, V.L. ( 2007). LOKK statistics 2006, Women in shelters (Rep. No. ISBN-13:987-87-92031-19-8). Copenhagen, Denmark : LOKK.
19.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. ( 2005). Top greatest "hits." The important findings and future directions for intimate partner violence research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 108-118.
20.
Lee, J., Pomeroy, E.C., & Bohman, T.M. ( 2007). Intimate partner violence and psychological health in a sample of Asian and Caucasian women: The roles of social support and coping . Journal of Family Violence, 22, 709-720.
21.
Lien, S., & Nørgaard, E. (2005). Rapportering fra krisesentrene (Report from shelters; Rep. No. 2006/25). Oslo-Kongsvinger : Statistics Norway.
22.
Magnusson, D. ( 1981). Towards a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
23.
Martin, J.N., & Nakayama, T.K. (2004). Intercultural communication in contexts (3rd ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill.
24.
McFarlane, J., Willson, P., Lemmey, D., & Malecha, A. ( 2000). Women filing assault charges on an intimate partner: Criminal justice outcome and future violence experienced. Violence Against Women, 6, 396-408.
25.
Mears, D.P., & Visher, C.A. ( 2005). Trends in understanding and addressing domestic violence . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 204-211.
26.
Menjivar, C., & Salcido, O. ( 2002). Immigrant women and domestic violence: Common experiences in different countries. Gender and Society, 16, 898-920.
27.
Messman-Moore, T.L., & Long, P.J. ( 2003). The role of childhood sexual abuse sequelae in sexual revictimization of women: An empirical review and theoretical reformulation . Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 537-571.
28.
Mirlees-Black, C. ( 1999). Domestic violence: Findings from a new British crime survey self-completion questionnaire (Home Office Research Study191). London: Home Office.
29.
Norwegian Ministry of Justice. (2005). Norwegian Ministry of Justice Violence survey 2003 & 2005. Retrieved July 19, 2005, from http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/jd/Documents-and-publications/Reports/Reports/2005/justisdepartementets-voldsmaling-16---23.html?id=458856
30.
Pape, H. & Stefansen, K. ( 2004). The hidden violence? Analyses of data from a random sample of men and women in the general population of Oslo city. (Rep. No. 1/2004) . Oslo, Norway: National Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress, NOVA.
31.
Ramirez, I.L. ( 2007). The relationship of acculturation and social integration to assault on intimate partners among Mexican American and non-Mexican White students. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 533-542.
32.
Sartin, R.M., Hansen, D.J., & Huss, M.T. ( 2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 11, 425-440.
33.
Schwartz, M.D. ( 2005). The past and the future of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 7-11.
34.
Statistics Norway. (1995). Level of living (Survey). Available from http://www.ssb.no
35.
Statistics Norway, (2006). Immigration and immigrants. Available from http://www.ssb.no/innvandring/
36.
Straus, M.A. ( 1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactic Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
37.
Straus, M.A., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugerman, D. ( 1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues , 17, 283-316.
38.
Sumter, M. ( 2006). Domestic violence and diversity: A call for multicultural services. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration , 29, 173-185.
39.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. ( 2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice programs, National Institute of Justice.
40.
Vatnar, S.K.B., & Bjørkly, S. (2008). An interactional perspective of intimate partner violence: An in-depth semi-structured interview of a representative sample of help-seeking women. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 265-279.
41.
Vatnar, S.K.B., & Bjørkly, S. (2009). Interactional aspects of intimate partner violence result in different help-seeking behaviors in a representative sample of women. Journal of Family Violence , 24, 231-241.
42.
Vatnar, S.K.B., & Bjørkly, S. (2010). Does it make any difference if she is a mother? An interactional perspective on intimate partner violence focusing on motherhood and pregnancy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 94-110.
43.
Winstok, Z. ( 2007). Toward an interactional perspective on intimate partner violence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 12, 348-363.
