Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2010-11
“But There’s a Million Jokes About Everybody . . .”: Prevalence of,and Reasons for,Directing Negative Behaviors Toward Gay Men on a Canadian University Campus
The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and types of negative behaviors directed toward gay men on university campuses and to understand heterosexual men’s and women’s motivations for engaging in antigay discrimination. Using a mixed methods approach, results from a quantitative survey (N = 286) indicated that students primarily engaged in covert antigay behaviors, such as telling antigay jokes and spreading gossip about gay men. Follow-up qualitative interviews with 8 highly homonegative individuals (4 men, 4 women) were then conducted to better understand their self-perceived motivations for perpetrating antigay discrimination. Results indicated that antigay behaviors were conducted to reinforce traditional male gender roles, alleviate feelings of discomfort, and convey heterosexual identity. Participants also expressed concern about being perceived as prejudiced and were motivated to control their prejudicial reactions to some degree. Implications regarding the contemporary nature of antigay violence on university campuses are discussed.
Burn, S.M. ( 2000). Heterosexuals’ use of "fag" and "queer" to deride one another: A contributor to heterosexism and stigma. Journal of Homosexuality, 40(2), 1-11.
2.
Burn, S.M., Kadlec, K., & Rexer, R. ( 2005). Effects of subtle heterosexism on gays, lesbians, and bisexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 23-38.
3.
D’Augelli, A.R., & Grossman, A.H. (2001). Disclosure of sexual orientation, victimization, and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual older adults . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1008-1027.
4.
DiIorio, C., Soet, J.E., Van Marter, D., Woodring, T.M., & Dudley, W.N. ( 2000). An evaluation of a self-generated identification code . Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 167-174.
5.
Dovidio, J.F. ( 2001). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave . Journal of Social Issues, 57, 829-849.
6.
Dunton, B.C., & Fazio, R.H. ( 1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 23, 316-326.
7.
Franklin, K. ( 1998). Unassuming motivations contextualizing the narratives of antigay assailants. In G. M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 1-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Franklin, K. ( 2000). Antigay behaviors among young adults: Prevalence, patterns and motivators in a non-criminal population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 339-362.
9.
Garnets, L., Herek, G.M., & Levy, B. ( 1990). Violence and victimization of lesbians and gay men: Mental health consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 366-383.
10.
Herek, G.M. ( 1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research , 25, 451-477.
11.
Herek, G.M. ( 1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206-228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Herek, G.M. ( 2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251-256.
13.
Herek, G.M., Gillis, J.R., Cogan, J.C., & Glunt, E.K. ( 1997). Hate crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: Prevalence, psychological correlates, and methodological issues. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 195-215.
14.
Howard-Hassmann, R.E. ( 2001). Gay rights and the right to a family: Conflict between liberal and illiberal belief systems. Human Rights Quarterly , 23, 73-95.
15.
Hudson, W.W., & Ricketts, W.A. (1980). A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 5, 357-372.
16.
Hurley, M.C. ( 2007). Sexual orientation and legal rights. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Library of Parliament.
17.
Kite, M.E., & Whitley, B.E., Jr. (2003). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis . In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay and bisexual experiences (2nd ed., pp. 165-187). New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
Lampinen, T.M., McGhee, D., & Martin, I. ( 2006). Increased risk of "club" drug use among gay and bisexual high school students inBritish Columbia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 458-461.
19.
Madon, S. ( 1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663-685.
20.
Morrison, M.A., & Morrison, T.G. (2002). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15-37.
21.
Morrison, M.A., Morrison, T.G., & Franklin, R. ( 2009). Modern and old-fashioned homonegativity among samples of Canadian and American university students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 523-542.
22.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. (2008 ). Non-discrimination. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.thetaskforce.org/issues/nondiscrimination
23.
Patel, S., Long, T.E., McCammon, S.L., & Wuensch, K.L. ( 1995). Personality and emotional correlates of self-reported antigay behaviours. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 354-366.
24.
Plant, E.A., & Devine, P.G. ( 1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832.
25.
Roderick, T., McCammon, S.L., Long, T.E., & Allred, L.J. ( 1998). Behavioral aspects of homonegativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 36(1), 79-88.
26.
Smith, J.A. ( 1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261-271.
27.
Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. ( 2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51-80). London: Sage.
28.
Tobin, G.A., & Begley, C.M. ( 2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework . Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388-396.
29.
Van Der Meer, T. ( 2003). Gay bashing: A rite of passage? Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 153-165.
