This study explored how changes in power relations within couples after immigrating from more patriarchal societies contribute to intimate partner violence (IPV). Both subjective decision-making power and objective power bases were examined in Chinese immigrant couples. Batterers and nonviolent men both experienced loss of decision-making power in favor of their spouses postimmigration. For the batterers, this loss appeared materialized by lower gains in education and lack of significant gains in income compared to their spouses. However, it was subjective power loss that was related to the batterers’ attitudes toward IPV. The study highlights the significance of understanding changes in power dynamics postimmigration among immigrants and the importance of distinguishing between subjective and material power to better capture power imbalance within couples.
Babcock, J.C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N.S., & Gottman, J.M. ( 1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40-50.
2.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Bui, H.N., & Morash, M. ( 1999). Domestic violence in the Vietnamese immigrant community: An exploratory study. Violence Against Women, 5, 769-795.
5.
Chan, S., & Leong, C.W. ( 1994). Chinese families in transition: Cultural conflicts and adjustment problems. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless , 3, 263-281.
6.
Claes, J.A., & Rosenthal, D.M. (1990). Men who batter women: A study in power. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 215-224.
7.
Coleman, D.H., & Straus, M.A. ( 1986). Marital power, conflicts, and violence in a nationally representative sample ofAmerican couples. Violence and Victims , 1, 141-157.
8.
Cromwell, R.F., & Olson, D.H. ( 1975). Power in families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. ( 1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy . New York: Free Press.
10.
Dutton, D.G., & Golant, S.K. ( 1995). The batterer: A psychological profile. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. ( 1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique . Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513-538.
12.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Bates, L. ( 1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence, Part III: Sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and differing consequences of husband and wife violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior , 2, 285-307.
13.
Hornung, C.A., McCullough, B.C., & Sugimoto, T. ( 1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43, 675-692.
14.
Hotaling, G.T., & Sugarman, D.B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 101-124.
15.
Jin, X., Eagle, M., & Yoshioka, M. ( 2007). Early exposure to violence in the family of origin and positive attitudes towards marital violence: Chinese immigrant male batterers vs. controls. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 211-222.
16.
Kim, B.O. ( 1996). Shame and violence: The understanding of Korean wife batterers (Doctoral dissertation, Drew University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(4-A), 1665.
17.
Kim, J.Y., & Sung, K. ( 2000). Conjugal violence in Korean American families: A residue of the cultural tradition. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 331-345.
18.
Kuijer, R.G., Buunk, B.P., & Ybema, J.F. ( 2001). Are equity concerns important in the intimate relationship when one partner of a couple has cancer? Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 267-282.
19.
Liao, M.S. ( 2006). Domestic violence among Asian Indian immigrant women: Risk factors, acculturation, and intervention. Women & Therapy, 29(1-2), 23-39.
20.
Malik, N.M., & Lindahl, K.M. ( 1998). Aggression and dominance: The role of power and culture in domestic violence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice , 5, 409-423.
21.
McDonald, G.W. ( 1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970-1979. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 841-854.
22.
Miller, B.D. ( 1992). Wife-beating in India: Variations on a theme. In D. A. Counts, J. K. Brown, & J. C. Campbell (Eds.), Sanctions and sanctuary: Cultural perspectives on the beating of wives (pp. 173-184). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
Rhee, S. ( 1997). Domestic violence in the Korean immigrant family. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 24, 63-77.
24.
Saunders, D.G., Lynch, A.B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. ( 1987). The Inventory of Beliefs About Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39-57.
25.
Scanzoni, J. ( 1979). Social processes and power in families. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill , F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, Volume I (pp. 296-316). New York: Free Press.
Song-Kim, Y.I. ( 1992). Battered Korean women in urban United States. In S. M. Furuto, R. Biswas, D. Chung, K. Murase, & F. Ross-Sheriff (Eds.), Social work practice with Asian Americans (pp. 213-226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Straus, M.A. ( 1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
29.
Straus, M.A., Gelles, R.J., & Steinmetz, S.K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor/Doubleday .
30.
Walster, E.G., Walster, W., & Berscheid, E. ( 1978). Equity theory and research. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
