More than 20 years ago, concerns were raised about whether domestic violence and sexual assault agencies need for stable funding would conflict with the values that initiated these respective movements. Since then, the movements have evolved considerably. Therefore, it is timely to investigate the challenges domestic violence and sexual assault agencies face today. This exploratory study used focus groups and interviews to identify the challenges facing North Carolina domestic violence and sexual assault movements from the perspectives of agency directors and funding staff. Using an open-coding approach, seven challenges were identified including funding, sustainability, community norms, tension between grassroots versus professional service providers, lack of attention to sexual assault, the need for welcoming services for all survivors, and the need for comprehensive services to help survivors with co-occurring mental illnesses and substance abuse problems. The findings also pointed to recommendations for ways to address these challenges.
Bell, C.C., & Mattis, J. ( 2000). The importance of cultural competence in ministering to African American victims of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 6, 515-532.
2.
Bent-Goodley, T.B. ( 2005). Culture and domestic violence: Transforming knowledge development. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 195-203.
3.
Bergen, R.K. ( 1996). Wife rape: Understanding the response of survivors and service providers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Campbell, R., Sefl, T., Barnes, H.E., Ahrens, C.E., Wasco, S.M., & Zaragoza-Diesfeld, Y. (1999). Community services for rape survivors: Enhancing psychology well-being or increasing trauma? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 847-858.
5.
Campbell, J., Snow Jones, A., Dienemann, J., Kub, J., Schollenberg, J., O’Campo, P., et al. (2002). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1157-1163.
6.
Edmond, T. ( 2005, January). Theoretical and intervention preferences of service providers addressing violence against women: A national survey. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference, Miami, Florida.
7.
Elliott, D., Bjelajac, P., Fallot, R., Markoff, L., & Reed, B. ( 2005). Trauma-informed or trauma-denied: Principles and implementation of trauma-informed services for women. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(4), 461-477.
8.
Ely, G.E. ( 2004). Domestic violence and immigrant communities in the United States: A review of women’s unique needs and recommendations for social work practice and research. Stress, Trauma, and Crisis, 7, 223-241.
9.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
10.
Golding, J.M. ( 1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99-132.
11.
Gornick, J., Burt, M.R., & Pittman, K.J. ( 1985). Structure and activities of rape crisis centers in the early 1980s. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 247-268.
12.
Harris, M., & Fallot, R.D. ( 2001). Using trauma theory to design service systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Harvey, M.R. ( 1985). Exemplary rape crisis programs: A cross-site analysis and case studies. Washington, DC: National Center for the Prevention and Control of Rape.
14.
Kohl, P.L., & Macy, R.J. ( 2008). Profiles of victimized women among the child welfare population: Implications for targeted child welfare policy and practices. Journal of Family Violence, 23(1), 57-68.
15.
Koss, M.P., & Harvey, M.R. ( 1991). The rape victim: Clinical and community interventions (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
16.
Krueger, R., & Casey, M.A. ( 2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
17.
Kubany, E.S., & Watson, S.B. ( 2002) Cognitive trauma therapy for formerly battered women with PTSD: Conceptual bases and treatment outlines. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 111-127.
18.
Lee, R.K., Thompson, V.L.S., & Mechanic, M.B. (2002). Intimate partner violence and women of color: A call for innovations. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 530-534.
19.
Logan, T.K., Walker, R., Cole, J., & Leukefeld, C. ( 2002). Victimization and substance abuse among women: Contributing factors, interventions, and implications. Review of General Psychology, 6, 325-397.
20.
Martin, P.Y. ( 2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. New York: Routledge.
21.
Moracco, K.E., Brown, C.L., Martin, S.L., Chang, J.C., Dulli, L., Loucks-Sorrell, M.B., et al. (2004). Mental health issues among female clients of domestic violence programs in North Carolina. Psychiatric Services, 55, 1036-1040.
22.
Moracco, K.E., Hilton, A., Hodges, K.G., & Frasier, P.Y. ( 2005). Knowledge and attitudes about intimate partner violence among immigrant Latinos in rural North Carolina: Baseline information and implications for outreach. Violence Against Women, 11, 337-352.
23.
Najavits, L. ( 2002). Seeking safety: A treatment manual for PTSD and substance abuse. New York: Guilford.
24.
North Carolina CoalitionAgainst Domestic Violence. (2006). North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence Best Practices Manual. Durham, NC: Author.
25.
Padgett, D.K. ( 1998). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Patton, M.Q. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Pfouts, J.H., & Renz, C. ( 1981). The future of wife abuse programs. Social Work, 26, 451-455.
28.
Plichta, S.B. ( 2004). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: Policy and practice implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1296-1323.
29.
Plichta, S.B., & Falik, M. ( 2001). Prevalence of violence and its implications for women’s health. Women’s Health Issues, 11, 244-258.
30.
Tjaden, P.G., & Thoennes, N. ( 2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey (National Criminal Justice Publication No. 181867). Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs .
31.
Tjaden, P.G., & Thoennes, N. ( 2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey (National Criminal Justice Publication No. 210346). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
32.
Ullman, S. E., & Townsend, S. M. (2007). Barriers to working with sexual assault survivors: A qualitative study of rape crisis center workers. Violence Against Women, 13, 412-443. Vinton, L. (2003). A model collaborative project toward making domestic violence centers elder ready. Violence Against Women, 9, 1504-1513.
