This research investigates low religiosity as a predictor of violent victimization. The theoretical framework the authors present here posits that religiosity should help structure daily activities in such a way as to (a) limit exposure to offenders by encouraging contact with peers who are less deviant, (b) lessen one's target suitability by inhibiting grievance-causing delinquent activity, and (c) enhance guardianship by fostering stronger bonds with parents and school. Thus, although researchers expect religion to be a bivariate predictor of violent victimization, its influence should be indirect. The authors investigate these claims using two waves from the public-use version of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). The results indicate that religiosity is a correlate of violent victimization. Consistent with these theoretical claims, the effect of religiosity is not direct, but instead occurs indirectly primarily through its influence on self-reported delinquency and peer deviance.
Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
2.
Augustine, M.C., Wilcox, P., Ousey, G.C., & Clayton, R.R. (2002). Opportunity theory and adolescent school-based victimization. Violence and Victims, 17, 233-253.
3.
Baier, C.J., & Wright, B.R.E. (2001). “If you love me, keep my commandments”: A meta-analysis of the effect of religion on crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 3-21.
4.
Baron, S., Kennedy, L.W., & Forde, D.R. (2001). Male street youths' conflict: The role of background, subcultural, and situational factors. Justice Quarterly, 18, 759-789.
5.
Benda, B.B. (1995). The effect of religion on adolescent delinquency revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 446-466.
6.
Benda, B.B. (1997). An examination of a reciprocal relationship between religiosity and different forms of delinquency within a theoretical model . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 163-186.
7.
Benda, B.B., & Corwyn, R.F. (1997). Religion and delinquency: The relationship after considering family and peer influences. Journal of the Scientific Study ofReligion, 36, 81-92.
8.
Benda, B.B., & Corwyn, R.F. (2002). Are the effects of religion on crime mediated, moderated, and misrepresented by inappropriate measures?Journal of Social Service Research, 27, 57-86.
9.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Criminal victimization in the United States: 2001 statistical tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Burkett, S.R., & Warren, B.O. (1987). Religiosity, peer associations, and adolescent marijuana use: A panel study of underlying causal structures. Criminology, 25, 109-131.
12.
Burkett, S.R., & White, M. (1974). Hellfire and delinquency: Another look. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 455-462.
13.
Cochran, J.K., (1988). The effect of religiosity on secular and ascetic deviance. Sociological Focus, 21, 293-306.
14.
Cochran, J.K., & Akers, R.L. (1989). Beyond hellfire: An examination of the variable effects of religiosity on adolescent marijuana and alcohol use. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 198-225.
15.
Cochran, J.K., Wood, P.K., & Arneklev, B.J. (1994). Is the religiosity-delinquency relationship spurious? A test of arousal and social control theories. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 92-123.
16.
Cohen, L.E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
17.
Cohen, L.E., Kluegel, J.R., & Land, K. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review, 46, 505-524.
18.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
19.
Cunradi, C.B., Caetano, R., & Schafer, J. (2002). Religious affiliation, denominational homogamy, and intimate partner violence among U.S. couples. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 139-151.
20.
Dijkstra, A., & Peschar, J.L. (1996). Religious determinants of academic attainment in the Netherlands. Comparative Education Review, 40, 47-65.
21.
Durkheim, E. [1897] (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
22.
Elifson, K.W., Petersen, D.M., & Hadaway, C.K. (1983). Religion and delinquency: A contextual analysis . Criminology, 21, 505-527.
23.
Esbensen, F.A., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1999). Family context and criminal victimization in adolescence . Youth and Society, 31, 168-198.
24.
Evans, T.D., Cullen, F.T., Dunaway, G., & Burton, V.S. (1995). Religion and crime reexamined: The impact of religion, secular controls, and social ecology on adult criminality. Criminology, 33, 195-217.
25.
Felson, M. (1986). Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal control, and criminal outcomes. In D. B. Cornish & R. V.Clarke (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. (pp. 119-128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
26.
Fisher, B.S., Sloan, J.J., Cullen, F.T., & Lu, C. (1998). Crime in the ivory tower: The level and sources of student victimization. Criminology, 36, 671-710.
27.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1987). The methodological adequacy of longitudinal research on crime. Criminology, 25, 581-614.
28.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford.
29.
Grasmick, H.G., Bursik, Jr.,R.J., & Cochran, J.K. (1991). Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's: Religiosity and taxpayers' inclination to cheat. Sociological Quarterly , 32, 251-266.
30.
Harris, M.A. (2003). Religiosity and perceived future ascetic deviance and delinquency among Mormon adolescents: Testing the “this worldly” supernatural sanctions thesis. Sociological Inquiry, 73, 28-51.
31.
Haynie, D.L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013-1057.
32.
Haynie, D.L., & Piquero, A. (2006). Pubertal development and physical victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 43, 3-35.
33.
Hindelang, M.J., Gottfredson, M.R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge: Ballinger.
34.
Hindelang, M., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
Hirschi, T., & Stark, R. (1969). Hellfire and delinquency. Social Problems, 17, 202-213.
37.
Hoelter, J. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness of fit indices. Sociological Methods Research, 11, 325-344.
38.
Howard, D., Qiu, Y., & Boekeloo, B. (2003). Personal and social contextual correlates of adolescent dating violence. Journal of AdolescentHealth, 33, 9-17.
39.
Jensen, G.F., & Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity theory. Violence and Victims, 1, 85-99.
40.
Jeynes, W.H. (2003). The effects of Black and Hispanic 12th graders living in intact families and being religious on their academic achievement . Urban Education, 38, 35-57.
41.
Johnson, B.R., Jang, S.J., Larson, D.B., & Li, S.D. (2001). Does adolescent religious commitment matter? A reexamination of the effects of religiosity on delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 22-44.
42.
Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.70. Scientific Software International, Inc.
43.
Jussim, L., & Osgood, D.W. (1989). Influence and similarity among friends: An integrated model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly, 84, 98-112.
44.
Kennedy, L., & Forde, D.R. (1998). When push comes to shove: A routine conflict approach to violence. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
45.
Kvaraceus, W.C. (1944). Delinquent behavior and church attendance. Sociology and Social Research, 28, 284-289.
46.
Lauritsen, J.L. (2001). The social ecology of violent victimization: Individual and contextual effects in the NCVS. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 17, 3-37.
47.
Lauritsen, J.L., Laub, J.H., & Sampson, R.J. (1992). Conventional and delinquent activities: Implications for the prevention of violent victimization among adolescents. Violence and Victims, 7, 91-108.
48.
Lauritsen, J.L., Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1991). Addressing the link between offending and victimization among adolescents. Criminology, 29, 265-91.
49.
Lombroso, C. (1911). Crime, its causes and remedies. Boston: Little Brown.
50.
Marcos, A.C., Bahr, S.J., & Johnson, R.E. (1986). Test of a bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use. Social Forces, 65, 135-161.
51.
Mason, W.A., & Windle, M. (2001). Family, religious, school, and peer influences on adolescents' alcohol use: A longitudinal study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 44-53.
52.
Meier, R.F., & Miethe, T.D. (1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization . Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 17, 459-499.
53.
Miethe, T.D., Stafford, M.C., & Long, J.S. (1987). Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyles theories. American Sociological Review, 52, 184-194.
54.
Miethe, T.D., Stafford, M.C., & Sloane, D. (1990). Lifestyle changes and risk of criminal victimization. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 6, 357-376.
55.
Mustaine, E.E., & Tewksbury, R. (1998). Predicting risks of larceny theft victimization: A routine activity analysis using refined activity measures. Criminology, 36, 829-858.
Pearce, L.D., & Haynie, D.L. (2004). Intergenerational religious dynamics and adolescent delinquency. Social Forces, 82, 1553-1572.
58.
Piquero, A.R., & Hickman, M. (2003). Extending Tittle's control balance theory to account for victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 282-301.
59.
Regnerus, M.D. (2003). Linked lives, faith, and behavior: Intergenerational religious influence on adolescent delinquency. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 189-203.
60.
Ross, L.E. (1994). Religion and deviance: Exploring the impact of social control elements. Sociological Spectrum, 14, 65-86.
61.
Schreck, C.J. (1999). Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly , 16, 633-654.
62.
Schreck, C.J., & Fisher, B.S. (2004). Specifying the influence of family and peers on violent victimization: Extending routine activities and lifestyles theories . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1021-1041.
63.
Schreck, C.J., Fisher, B.S., & Miller, J.M. (2004). The social context of violent victimization: A study of the delinquent peer effect. Justice Quarterly, 21, 23-48.
64.
Schreck, C.J., Wright, R.A., & Miller, J.M. (2002). A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization. Justice Quarterly, 19, 159-180.
65.
Singer, S.I. (1981). Homogeneous victim-offender populations: A review and some research implications. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 779-788.
66.
Smith, C. (2003). Theorizing religious effects among American adolescents . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 17-30.
67.
Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W.S. (1989). Religion, deviance, and social control. New York: Routledge .
68.
Stewart, E.A., Elifson, K.W., & Sterk, C.E. (2004). Integrating the general theory into an explanation of violent victimization among female offenders. Justice Quarterly , 21, 159-182.
69.
Tedeschi, J., & Felson, R.B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
70.
Tittle, C.R., & Welch, M.R. (1983). Religiosity and deviance: Toward a contingency theory of constraining effects. Social Forces, 61, 653-682.
71.
Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism . New York: Scribner.
72.
Whitbeck, L.B., Hoyt, D.R., & Yoder, K.A. (1999). Risk-amplification model of victimization and depressive symptoms among runaway and homeless adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 273-296.
73.
Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
