Central to the development of culturally competent violence prevention programs for Hispanic youth is the development of psychometrically sound violence risk and outcome measures for this population. A study was conducted to determine the psychometric properties of two commonly used violence measures, in this case for Mexican American adolescent females. The Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) and the Past Feelings and Acts of Violence Scale (PFAV) were analyzed to examine their interitem reliability, criterion validity, and discriminant validity. A sample of 150 low-risk and 150 high-risk adolescent females was studied. Discriminant validity was indicated by the perpetrator negotiation scale and by the victim psychological aggression and sexual coercion scales of the CTS2 and the PFAV. Analysis indicates that the CTS2 scales and the PFAV demonstrate adequate reliability, whereas strong criterion validity was evidenced by eight of the CTS2 scales and the PFAV.
Astin, M. C., Lawrence, K. J., & Foy, D. W. (1993). Posttraumatic stress disorder among battered women: Risk and resiliency factors. Violence and Victims, 8, 17-28.
2.
Bergsmann, I. R. (1989). The forgotten few: Juvenile female offenders. Federal Probation, 53, 73-78.
3.
Block, C. R., & Block, R. (1993). Street gang crime in Chicago. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
4.
Brent, D. A., & Kolko, W. (1990). Suicide and suicidal behavior in children and adolescents. In B. D. Garfinkel, G. A. Carlson, & E. B. Weller (Eds.), Psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 106-121). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
5.
Centers for Disease Control. (2000). YRBSS: Youth risk behavior surveillance summaries.Retrieved May 15, 2001, from http:www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmhrhtml/ss4905a1.htm
6.
Centers for Disease Control. (2003). Health, United States, 2003. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars
7.
Cepeda, A., & Valdez, A. (2003). Risk behaviors among young Mexican-American gang-associated females: Sexual relations, partying, substance abuse, and crime. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 90-106.
8.
Cervantes, R. C., & Acosta, F. X. (1992). Psychological testing for Hispanic Americans. Journal of Applied and Preventative Psychology, 1, 209-219.
9.
Cervantes, R. C., Salgado de Snyder, N., & Padilla, A. M. (1991). The Hispanic Stress Inventory: A culturally relevant approach to psychosocial assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 438-447.
10.
Cizek, G. J., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1999). An introduction to logistic regression. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31, 223-245.
11.
Clearly, P. D., & Angel, R. (1984). The analysis of relationships involving dichotomous dependent variables. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 334-348.
12.
Evans, W. P., Marte, R. M., Betts, S., & Silliman, B. (2001). Adolescent suicide risk and peer-related violent behaviors and victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1330-1348.
13.
Greenwald, D. J., Reznikoff, M., & Plutchik, R. (1994). Suicide risk and violence risk in alcoholics: Predictors of aggressive risk. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 182, 3-8.
14.
Hoffer, T. A., & Cervantes, R. C. (1992). Psychological effects of exposure to gang violence. In R. C. Cervantes (Ed.), Substance abuse and gang violence (pp. 121-135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Homung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., & Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 672-675.
16.
Inazu, J. K., & Fox, G. L. (1980). Mother-daughter communication about sex. Family Relations, 29, 347-353.
17.
Kantor, G. K., & Straus, M. A. (1989). Substance abuse as a precipitant of wife abuse victimization. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 15, 173-189.
18.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
19.
Levin, J., & Fox, J. A. (2002). Elementary statistics in social research (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn &Bacon.
20.
Linsky, A. S., Bachman, R., & Straus, M. A. (1995). Stress, culture and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Lown, E. A., & Vega, W. A. (2001). Prevalence and predictors of physical partner abuse among Mexican-American women. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 441-445.
22.
Maxson, C. L., & Klein, M. W. (1990). Street gang violence: Twice as great or half as great? In C. R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 71-100). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Mccarroll, J. E., Thayer, L. E., Ursano, R. J., Newby, J. H., Norwood, A. E., & Fullerton, C. S. (2000). Are respondents who omit Conflict Tactics Scale items more violent than those who omit none. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 872-882.
24.
Molidor, C., & Tolman, R. M. (1998). Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence. Violence Against Women, 4, 180-194.
25.
National Center for Juvenile Justice. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: National report 1999. Retrieved August 12, 2002, from http://www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org
26.
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2002). Healthy people 2010. Retrieved April 30, 2002, from http://health.gov/healthypeople
27.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2001). Homicides of children and youth (Report No. NCJ 187239). Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Plutchik, R., & van Praag, H. M. (1990). A self-report measure of violence risk, II. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 31, 450-456.
29.
Plutchik, R., van Praag, H. M., & Conte, H. R. (1989). Correlates of suicide and violence risk: A two-stage model of countervailing forces. Psychiatry Research, 28, 215-225.
30.
Poe-Yamagata, E., & Butts, J. A. (1996). Female offenders in the juvenile justice system: Statistics summary. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
31.
Rennison, C. M. (2002). Hispanic victims of violent crime, 1993-2000 (Report No. NCJ 191208). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
32.
Roberts, R. E. (1980). Reliability of the CES-D scale in different ethnic settings. Psychiatry Research, 2, 125-134.
33.
Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-89.
34.
Straus, M., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and the preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
35.
Sugihara, Y., & Warner, J. A. (2002). Dominance and domestic violence among Mexican-Americans: Gender differences in the etiology of violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 315-340.
36.
U.S. Surgeon General. (2001). Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General. Retrieved October 5, 2001, from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov
37.
Valdez, A., & Kaplan, C. (1999). Reducing selection bias in the use of focus groups to investigate hidden populations: The case of Mexican-American gang members from South Texas. Drugs and Society, 14, 209-224.
38.
Yin, Z., Valdez, A., Mata, A. G., & Kaplan, C. D. (1996). Developing a field-intensive method for generating a randomized sample for gang research. Free Inquiry—Special Issue: Gangs, Drugs, and Violence, 24, 195-204.
