This article relies on literature from the field and on research conducted by the National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center to describe the difficulties encountered in collaborations between researchers and advocates working on the prevention of violence against women. The article summarizes guidelines for collaboration that have been suggested by many researchers and advocates, and it makes the claim that a feminist approach to liberating methodologies for action research is needed to increase the likelihood of successful collaborations.
Campbell, J. C., Dienemann, J., Kub, J., Wurmser, T., & Loy, E. (1999). Collaborationas partnership. Violence Against Women, 5, 1140-1157.
2.
Chalk, R., & King, P. A. (1998). Violence in families: Assessing prevention and treatment programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3.
Crawford, M., & Kimmel, E. (1999). Promoting methodological diversity in feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 1-6.
4.
Edleson, J. L., & Bible A. L. (1998, July). Forced bonding or community collaboration? Partnerships between science and practice in research on women battering. Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice Annual Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation: Viewing Crime and Justice from a Collaborative Perspective, Washington, DC.
5.
Edleson, J. L., & Bible, A. L. (2001). Collaborating for women’s safety: Partnerships between research and practice. In C. Renzetti, J. Edleson, & R. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook of violence against women (pp. 73-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Gondolf, E. W., Yllo, K., & Campbell, J K. (1997). Collaboration between researchers and advocates. In G. K. Kantor & J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of the darkness (pp. 255-270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Harding S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
Human Interaction Research Institute. (2003) HIRI’s community collaboration projects. Available at www.humaninteract.org/images/community.pdf
9.
Jayaratne, T. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social science. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 85-106). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Resick, P. A., & Williams, L. M. (2001). Fostering collaborations between violence against women researcher and practitioners. Social Insight, 6, 29-36.
11.
Mouradian, V. E., Mechanic, M. B., & Williams, L. M. (2003). Recommendations for establishing and maintaining successful researcher practitioner collaborations. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
12.
National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center. (2001). Fostering collaborations to prevent violence against women: Integrating findings from practitioner and researcher focus groups. Charleston: Medical University of South Carolina.
13.
Peplau, L. A., & Conrad, E. (1989). Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 379-400.
14.
Russo, N. F. (1999). Editorial: Feminist research: Questions and methods. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, i-iv.
15.
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2003a). Re-examining femicide: Breaking the silence and crossing “scientific” borders. Signs, 28, 2-15.
16.
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2003b, March). Violence against women and politically progressive/liberating methodology. Paper presented at Wellesley Centers for Women, Anthropology 460, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA.
17.
Williams, L. M., Banyard, V. L. & Aoudeh, N. (in press). Voices from the margins: Alternative research on violence against women: Introduction to the Special Issue. Violence Against Women.
18.
Yllo, K. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury, CA: Sage.
