Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Dutton, D. G. (1985). An ecologically nested theory of male violence toward intimates. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8(4), 404-413.
3.
Dutton, D. G., & Kropp, P. R. (2000). A review of domestic violence risk instruments. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1(2), 171-181.
4.
Flay, B. R. & Petraitas, J. (1994). The theory of triadic influence: Anewtheory of health behavior with implications for preventive interventions. Advances in Medical Sociology, 4, 19-44.
5.
Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262-290.
6.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000-1019.
7.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
8.
Johnson, M. P. (2000). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice Gender Symmetry Workshop, Arlington, VA.
9.
Levinson, D. (1989). Family violence in cross-cultural perspective. Newbury Park: Sage.
10.
Saunders, D. G. (1996). Feminist-cognitive-behavioral and process-psychodynamic treatments for men who batter: Interaction of abuser traits and treatment models. Violence and Victims, 11(4), 393-414.
11.
Silverman, J. G., & Williamson, G. M. (1997). Social ecology and entitlements involved in battering by heterosexual college males: Contributions of family and peers. Violence and Victims, 12, 147-164.
12.
Yllo, K. (1983). Sexuality inequality and violence against wives in American states. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 67-86.
