The actuarial Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) was developed for male offenders where it has shown excellent replicability in many new forensic samples using officially recorded outcomes. Clinicians also make decisions, however, about the risk of interpersonal violence posed by nonforensic psychiatric patients of both sexes. Could an actuarial risk assessment developed for male forensic populations be used for a broader clientele? We modified the VRAG to permit evaluation using data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study that included nonforensic male and female patients and primarily self-reported violence. The modified VRAG yielded a large effect size in the prediction of dichotomous postdischarge severe violence over 20 and 50 weeks. Accuracy of VRAG predictions was unrelated to sex. The results provide evidence about the robustness of comprehensive actuarial risk assessments and the generality of the personal factors that underlie violent behavior.
Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
2.
Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142.
3.
Cohen, J. A. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
4.
Dempster, R. J., Hart, S. D., & Boer, D. P. (2002). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments. Unpublished manuscript.
5.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Groggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works. Criminology, 34, 575-607.
6.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
7.
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
8.
Harris, G. T., Hilton, N. Z., & Rice, M. E. (1993). Patients admitted to psychiatric hospital: Presenting problems and resolution at discharge. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, 267-285.
9.
Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Understanding and managing sexually coercive behavior (pp. 198-210). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
10.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2002). Prospective replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in predicting violent recidivism among forensic patients. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 377-395.
11.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
12.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Lalumière, M. L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
13.
Kroner, D., & Mills, J. (2001). The relative efficacy of predicting criminal behavior: A comparison of five instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
14.
Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2000). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 101-118.
15.
Loza, W., Villeneuve, D. B., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2002). Predictive validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide: A tool for assessing violent offender’s recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 85-92.
16.
McBride, M. (1999, February). Predicting violence among federal inmates. Paper presented at the Corrections Research Forum, Toronto, Canada.
17.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., Silver, E., et al. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312-319.
18.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Clark Robbins, P., Mulvey, E. P., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Nadeau, J., Nadeau, B., Smiley, W. C., & McHattie, L. (1999, November). The PCL-R and VRAG as predictors of institutional behaviour. Paper presented at the Conference on Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Implications for the Prevention of Violence, Vancouver, Canada.
20.
Nichols, T. L., Vincent, G. M., Whittemore, K. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1999, November). Assessing risk of inpatient violence in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients: Comparing the PCL: SV, HCR-20, and VRAG. Paper presented at the Conference on Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Implications for the Prevention of Violence, Vancouver, Canada.
21.
Nugent, P. M. (2001). The use of detention legislation: Factors affecting detention decisions and recidivism among high-risk federal offenders in Ontario (Doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61(12-B), 6716-6716.
22.
Pham, T. H. (2002, October). Risk assessment and biological markers. Paper presented at Belgian Congress of Neuropsychology, Leuven, Belgium.
23.
Quinsey, V. L., Book, A., & Skilling, T. A. (in press). A follow-up of deinstitutionalized developmentally handicapped men with histories of antisocial behavior. Journal of Developmental Disabilities.
24.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
26.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231-241.
27.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2002). Men who molest their sexually immature daughters: Is a special explanation required?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 329-339.
28.
Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203-215.
29.
Seto, M. C., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (in press). The clinical, criminogenic, and social problems of forensic and civil psychiatric patients. Law and Human Behavior.
30.
Skeem, J. L., Monahan, J., & Mulvey, E. P. (2002). Psychopathy, treatment involvement, and subsequent violence among civil psychiatric patients. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 577-603.
31.
Steadman, H. J., Mulvey, E. P., Monahan, J., Robbins, P. C., Appelbaum, P. S., Grisso, T., et al. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 393-401.
32.
Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P. S., Clark Robbins, P., Mulvey, E. P., et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83-100.
33.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
34.
Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997).Assessing risk of violence to others. In C. D. Webster & M. A. Jackson (Eds.), Impulsivity: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 251-277). New York: Guilford.
