Realizing that the assessment of dangerousness with a yes/no format as a poor form of violent risk assessment has been the most important lesson learned about violence in the last 20 years. Further examining (a) what outcome and (b) how the indicators of the outcome should be measured has resulted in better violent risk assessment. The most promising methodological innovation in violent risk assessment has been the introduction of the receiver operating characteristic to assess the efficiency of risk prediction. In the future, the tension between prediction and explanation of violence will need to be maintained while focusing on a mechanism-driven strategy of risk management.
Blackburn, R. (2000). Classification and assessment of personality disorders in mentally disordered offenders: A psychological perspective. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, S8-S32.
2.
Einhorn, H. J. (1986). Accepting error to make less error. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 387-395.
3.
Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
4.
Monahan, J. (1981). The clinical prediction of violent behavior. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5.
Quinsey, V. L., & Abtmann, R. (1979). Variables affecting psychiatrists’ and teachers’ assessments of dangerousness of mentally ill offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 353-362.
6.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
7.
Shah, S. A. (1978). Dangerousness: A paradigm for exploring some issues in law and psychology. American Psychologist, 33, 224-238.
8.
Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza, J. J. (1974). Careers of the criminally insane: Excessive social control of deviance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
