This analogue study (written vignettes and videotapes) examines the influence of victim-perpetrator relationship (spouse or acquaintance), sex of perceiver, and type of abuse (psychological vs. physical) on attributions about victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. College student participants (73 men, 108 women) were randomly assigned to condition. As expected, type of relationship influenced observer perceptions. Specifically, participants rated the victim of marital violence as more psychologically damaged and disturbed by the abuse than the victim of acquaintance violence. Furthermore, interaction effects showed that men, more than women, rated the actions of the married perpetrator as more of a victim’s rights violation than the actions of the acquaintance perpetrator. Second, type of abuse was shown to influence perceptions of the perpetrator but not the victim. Sex-of-perceiver effects were also obtained. Women held the perpetrator more responsible and assigned less blame to the victim than did men. Legal and clinical implications are then discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, A. B. (1992). Victimization and survivor services (pp. 62-82). New York: Springer .
2.
Bachman, R. (1994, January). Violence against women: A national crime victimization survey report (p. 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics .
3.
Battaglia, D. M. (2000). When closeness matters in dating relationships: Or does it? Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(3-B), 1692.
4.
Carlson, B. E. (1997). Mental retardation and domestic violence: An ecological approach to intervention . Social Work, 42, 79-89 .
5.
Coleman, J. U., & Stith, S. M. (1997). Nursing students’ attitudes toward victims of domestic violence as predicted by selected individual and relationship variables . Journal of Family Violence, 12, 113-138 .
6.
Conner, K. R., & Ackerley, G. D. (1994). Alcohol-related battering: Developing treatment strategies . Journal of Family Violence, 9, 143-155 .
7.
Cook, C.A., & Harris, R. J. (1995). Attributions about spouse abuse in cases of bi-directional battering . Violence and Victims, 10, 143-151 .
8.
Craig, K. M. (2000). Defeated athletes, abusive males? Examining perceptions of professional athletes who batter . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1224-1232 .
9.
Davis, R. C., Lurigio, A. J., & Skogan, W. G. (1997). Victims of crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
10.
Englander, E. K. (1997). Understanding violence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
11.
Ewoldt, C., Monson, C. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2000). Attributions about rape in a continuum of dissolving marital relationships . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1176-1183 .
12.
Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships . Journal of Family Violence, 5, 107-120 .
13.
Harding, J. (1982). Victims and offenders, needs and responsibilities. London: Bedford Square Press .
14.
Jensen, E. B. (1995). Attributions of blame and derogation to victims and perpetrators of wife-battering. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(4-B), 2330.
15.
Lehmann, M., & Santilli, N. R. (1996). Sex differences in perceptions of spouse abuse . Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 229-238 .
16.
Lobel, T. E., Gewirtz, J., Pras, R., Shoeshine-Rokach, M., & Ginton, R. (1999). Preadolescents’ social judgments: The relationship between self-endorsement of traits and gender-related judgments of female peers . Sex Roles, 40, 483-498 .
17.
Mangold, W. D., & Koski, P. R. (1990). Gender comparisons in the relationship between parental and sibling violence and nonfamily violence . Journal of Family Violence, 5, 225-235 .
18.
Monson, C. M., Byrd, G. R., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1996). To have and to hold: Perceptions of marital rape . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 410-424 .
19.
Monson, C. M., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Binderup, T. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”? Attributions about date and marital rape . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1157-1175 .
20.
Nabi, R. L., & Horner, J. R. (2001). Victims with voices: How abused women conceptualize the problem of spousal abuse and implications for intervention and prevention . Journal of Family Violence, 16, 237-253 .
21.
Nicholas, K. B., & Bieber, S. L. (1994). Perceptions of mothers’ and fathers’ abusive and supportive behaviors . Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 167-178 .
22.
Norris, F. H., & Kaniasty, K. (1994). Psychological distress following criminal victimization in the general population: Cross-sectional, longitudinal and prospective analyses . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 111-123 .
23.
O’Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994). Physical aggression in early marriage: Prerelationship and relationship effects . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 594-602 .
24.
Pavlou, M., & Knowles, A. (2001). Domestic violence: Attributions, recommended punishments and reporting behavior related to provocation by the victim . Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 8, 76-85 .
25.
Pierce, M. C., & Harris, R. J. (1993). The effect of provocation, race, and injury description of men’s and women’s perceptions of a wife-battering incident . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 767-790 .
26.
Qualls, R. C., Cox, M. B., & Schehr, T. L. (1992). Racial attitudes on campus: Are there gender differences? Journal of College Student Development, 33, 524-530 .
27.
Rigakos, G. S. (1995). Constructing the symbolic complainant: Police subculture and the non-enforcement of protection orders for battered women . Violence and Victims, 10, 227-246 .
28.
Ruback, B. (1994). Advice to crime victims: Effects of crime, victim, and advisor factors . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 423-442 .
29.
Schroeder, K. A., Blood, L. L., & Maluso, D. (1993). Gender differences and similarities between male and female undergraduate students regarding expectations for career and family roles . College Student Journal, 27, 237-249 .
30.
Shields, N. M., & Hanneke, C. R. (1983). Attribution processes in violent relationships: Perception of violent husbands and their wives . Journal of Applied Psychology, 13, 515-527 .
31.
Shotland, R. L., & Straw, M. K. (1976). Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 990-999 .
32.
Simon, L. (1995). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence causes . Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 1, 43-79 .
33.
Stalans, L. J., & Finn, M. A. (1995). How novice and experienced officers interpret wife assaults: Normative and efficiency frames . Law and Society Review, 29, 287-321 .
34.
Stamp, G. H., & Sabourin, T. C. (1995). Accounting for violence: An analysis of male spousal abuse narratives . Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 284-307 .
35.
Summers, G., & Feldman, N. S. (1984). Blaming the victim versus blaming the perpetrator: An attributional analysis of spousal abuse . Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 2, 339-347 .
36.
Taub, N. (1983). Adult domestic violence: The law’s response . Victimology, 8, 152-177 .
37.
Tetreault, P. A., & Barnett, M. A. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353-358 .
38.
Willis, C. E., Hallinan, M. N., & Melby, J. (1996). Effects of sex role stereotyping among European American students on domestic violence culpability attributions . Sex Roles, 34, 475-491 .
