This study examined the expectations to help victims of intimate partner violence held by potential informal helpers such as friends and family. A total of 157 college students viewed one of two videotaped domestic violence scenarios, which varied on victim “provocation.” The present study tested a specific model in which victim blame mediates the relationship between helper characteristics and the type of intervention helpers expect to use. The model accounted for 22% of variance in general victim blame,40% of variance in blame toward the victim's specific behavior/characteristics, and 27% of variance in the expectation to use specific helpful inter ventions. High perceived provocation and violence-condoning attitudes held by participants predicted greater victim blame, and general victim blame appeared to mediate the relationship between attitudes and intervention. Female participants demonstrated less general victim blame and provided more helpful interventions than males. Implications for educational programs and continued research are discussed
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aubrey, M. , & Ewing, C. P. (1989). Student and voter subjects: Differences in attitudes toward batteredwomen. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 289-297.
2.
Avis, J. M. (1992). Current trends in feminist thought and therapy: Perspectives on sexual abuse andviolence within families in North America. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 4, 87-99.
3.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4.
Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism andprosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 282-316). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Beyers, J. M. , Leonard, J. M., Mays, V. K., & Rosen, L. A. (2000). Gender differences in the perception of courtship abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 451-465.
6.
Bookwala, J. , Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., & Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 297-311.
7.
Browne, A. (1993). Violence against women by male partners. American Psychologist, 48, 1077-1085.
8.
Carlson, B. E. (1996). Dating violence: Student beliefs about consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 3-17.
9.
Davis, R. C. , & Brickman, E. (1996). Supportive andunsupportive aspects of behavior of others towardvictims of sexual andnonsexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 250-262.
10.
Dent, D. Z. , & Arias, I. (1990). Effects of alcohol, gender, and role of spouses on attributions and evaluations of marital violence scenarios. Violence and Victims, 5, 185-193.
11.
Eagly, R. H. , & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283-308.
12.
Feather, N. T. (1996). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35, 115-123.
13.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Foshee, V. , & Linder, G. (1997). Factors influencing service provider motivation to help adolescent victims of partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 648-664.
15.
Greenblat, C. (1985). Don't hit your wife unless...: Preliminary findings on normative support for the use of force by husbands. Victomology: An International Journal, 10, 221-240.
16.
Hamilton, B. , & Coates, J. (1993). Perceivedhelpfulness anduse of professional services by abusedwomen. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 313-323.
17.
Harris, R. J. , & Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers andvictims are. Sex Roles, 30, 553-565.
18.
Herman, J. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Hillier, L. , & Foddy, M. (1993). The role of observer attitudes in judgments of blame in cases of wife assault. Sex Roles, 29, 629-643.
20.
Home, A. M. (1994). Attributing responsibility andassessing gravity in wife abuse situations: A comparative study of police and social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 19, 67-84.
21.
Howard, J. (1984). The “normal” victim: The effects of gender stereotypes on reactions to victims. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 270-281.
22.
Jacobson, N. , Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., & Rushe, R. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 982-988.
23.
Kristiansen, C. M. , & Giulietti, R. (1990). Perceptions of wife abuse: Effects of gender, attitudes towardwomen, andjust worldbeliefs among college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 177-189.
24.
Mahlstedt, D. , & Keeny, L. (1993). Female survivors of dating violence and their social networks. Feminism and Psychology, 3, 319-333.
25.
Pearlman, L. A. , & Mac Ian, P. S. (1995). Vicarious traumatization: An empirical study of the effects of trauma work on trauma therapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 558-565.
26.
Pierce, M. C. , & Harris, R. J. (1993). The effect of provocation, race, andinjury description on men's andwomen's perception of a wife-battering incident. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 767-790.
27.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
Ross, M. , & Glisson, C. (1991). Bias in social work intervention with batteredwomen. Journal of Social Service Research, 14, 79-105.
29.
Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity andrelevance on responsibility assignedfor an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101-113.
30.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.
