Logistic Regression Analysis: When the Odds Ratio Does Not Work

Abstract

The odds ratio is one of the most common measures used to assess the relationship between exposure to violence and adverse health outcomes, adjusting for possible confounding factors. A reason for the odds ratio's popularity is that it is relatively easy to calculate from the coefficients of a logistic regression model. For most etiologic studies of disease, the odds ratio is a suitable estimate of risk because incidence or prevalence of disease is rare (<10%). However, health outcomes studied in violence research are often more prevalent (e.g., fatigue, insomnia, stomach pain, and shortness of breath). In these cases, the odds ratio usually overestimates the strength of association, sometimes erroneously tripling the magnitude. Data from a study measuring the health effects of intimate partner violence are used to illustrate the problem of incorrectly using odds ratios. Methods to calculate relative risks and prevalence ratios from logistic regression models are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brenner, H. (1998). A potential pitfall in control of covariates in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 9, 68-71.

Drossman, D. A. , Leserman, J. , Nachman, G. , Li, Z. M. , Gluck, H. , Toomey, T. C. , & Mitchell, C. M. (1990). Sexual and physical abuse in women with functional or organic gastrointestinal disorders. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 828-833.

Houskamp, B. M. , & Foy, D. W. (1991). The assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 367-375.

Kemp, A. , Green, B. L. , Hovanitz, C. , & Raulings, E. I. (1995). Incidence and correlates of post-traumatic stress disorder in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 43-55.

McCauley, J. , Kern, D. E. , Kolodner, K. , Dill, L. , Schroeder, A. F. , DeChant, H. K. , Ryden, J. , Bass, E. B. , & Derogatis, L. R. (1995). The “battering syndrome”: Prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices. Annals of Internal Medicine, 123, 737-746.

McNutt, L. , Hafner, J. P. , & Xue, X. (1999). What's the relative risk? Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 529.

Rothman, K. J. , & Greenland, S. (1998). Modern epidemiology (pp. 253-300). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.

Saunders, D. G. , Hamberger, L. K. , & Hovey, M. (1993). Indicators of woman abuse based on a chart review at a family practice center. Archives of Family Medicine, 2, 537-543.

Silva, C. , McFarlane, J. , Soeken, K. , Parker, B. , & Reel, S. (1997). Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in abused women in a primary care setting. Journal of Women's Health, 6, 543-552.

10.

Stokes, M. E. , Davis, C. S. , & Koch, G. G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system (pp. 19-56, 163-214). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

11.

Zhang, J. , & Yu, K. F. (1998). What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1690-1691.