This article reports on a unique study that was designed to hear the
diverse voices of women on policy issues related to families in crisis.
The study provided insights into how women define family, how they
perceive families in crisis, and what they identify as important policy
issues. The implications for policy development are discussed.
References
1.
Abramovitz, M. (1988). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present.Boston : South End Press.
2.
Ahlburg, D.A., & DeVita, C.J. (1992). New realities of the American familyPopulation Bulletin, 47(2), 2-43.
3.
Aldous, J. (1987). American families in the 1980s: Individualism run amok?Journal of Family Issues, 8, 422-425.
4.
Ames, K. (1992, March 23). Domesticated blissNewsweek, pp. 62-63.
5.
Arizona Department of Economic Security. ( 1990). Census of population and housing.Phoenix: Author.
6.
Degler, C. (1980). At odds: Women and the family in America from the revolution to the present.New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Fine, M. (1992). Families in the United States: Their current status and future prospectsFamily Relations , 41, 430-435.
8.
Garvin, C. (1987). Contemporary group work.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Gross, E.R. (1992). Are families deteriorating or changing?Affilia, 7, 7-22.
11.
Hagen, J., & Davis, L. (1992). Working with women: Building a policy and practice agendaSocial Work, 37, 495-502.
12.
Hartman, A. (1981). The family: A central focus for practiceSocial Work, 26 , 7-13.
13.
Hartman, A. (1992). Murphy Brown, Dan Quayle, and the American familySocial Work, 37, 387-388.
14.
Kamerman, S. (1981). Child care, family benefits and working parents.New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
Maclean, M., & Groves, D. (1991). Women's issues in social policy.New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
16.
Miller, D. (1990). Women and social welfare: A feminist analysis.New York: Praeger.
17.
Moroney, R. (1991). Social policy and social work: Critical essays on the welfare state.New York: Aldine.
18.
Ms. Foundation for Women & Center for Policy Alternatives. (1992). A policy guide.New York and Washington, DC: Authors.
19.
Seaberg, J. (1990). Family policy revisited: Are we there yet?Social Work, 35 , 548-554.
20.
Spakes, P. (1985). The Supreme Court, family policy, and alternative family lifestyles: The clash of interestsLifestyles: Journal of Changing Patterns, 7 , 171-186.
21.
Spakes, P. (1991). A feminist approach to national family policy In E. Anderson & R. Hula (Eds.), The reconstruction of family policy (pp. 23-42). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
22.
Steiner, G. (1981). The futility of family policy.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
Wisensale, S. (1992). Toward the 21st century: Family change and public policyFamily Relations, 41, 417-422.
24.
Zimmerman, S. (1991). The policy functions of family policies in three states: A comparative analysis In E. Anderson & R. Hula (Eds.), The reconstruction of family policy (pp. 45-58). Westport, CT : Greenwood.
25.
Zimmerman, S. (1992). Family trends: What implications for family policy?Family Relations, 41, 423-429.
