This article reviews six major concerns in the feminist literature about the new reproductive technologies: (1) risks to women's health, (2) threats to women's reproductive rights and options, (3) discriminatory costs and benefits, (4) the expense of the procedures and their potential to funnel scarce resources from other pressing health and social needs, (5) issues related to prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy, and (6) the minimal involvement of women in policy debates. The article also suggests some areas in which further research is necessary.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Fertility Society. "Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies." Fertility and Sterility , 46 (September 1986), Supp. 1.
2.
Andrews, L. "The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood ." Hastings Center Report, 17 (October-November 1987), pp. 31-40.
3.
Annas, G. "Baby M.: Babies (and Justice) for Sale." Hastings Center Report, 17 (June 1987), pp. 13-15.
4.
Arditti, R., et al. Test Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? London, England: Pandora Press, 1984.
5.
Blumberg, L. "Why Fetal Rights Must Be Opposed." Social Policy, 18 (Fall 1987), pp. 40-41.
6.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Instruction on Respect for Human Life. Vatican City, Italy: The Vatican , 1987.
7.
Corea, G.The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.
8.
———. "The Reproductive Brothel." In Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women, edited by G. Corea et al., pp. 38-51. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
9.
Duelli Klein, R. "What's 'New' About the 'New' Reproductive Technologies ?" In Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women, edited by G. Corea et al., pp. 64-73. Bloomington : University of Indiana Press, 1987 .
10.
Dworkin, A.Right-Wing Women: New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1983.
11.
Edwards, R.G. Conception in theHuman Female. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
12.
———. "Test-Tube Babies." Nature, 293 (September 1981), pp. 253-256.
13.
Fine, M., and Asch, A.Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture and Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.
14.
Firestone, S.The Dialectic of Sex. New York: William Morrow & Co., 1970.
15.
Hanmer, J. "Reproductive Technology: The Future for Women?" In Machine Ex Dea, edited by J. Rothschild, pp. 183-197. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983.
16.
———. "Transforming Consciousness: Women and the New Reproductive Technologies ." In Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies A f fect Women, edited by G. Corea et al., pp. 88-109. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
17.
Holmes, H.B., et al. Preface to The Custom-Made Child? Women-Centered Perspectives , edited by Holmes et al., pp. ix-xi. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1981.
18.
Holmes, H.B., and Hoskins, B.B. "Prenatal and Preconception Sex Choice Technologies: A Path to Femicide? " In Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women, edited by G. Corea et al., pp. 15-29. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
19.
Hubbard, R. "Test-Tube Babies: Solution or Problem?" Technology Review, 82 (March-April 1980), pp. 10-12.
20.
———. "The Case Against In Vitro Fertilization and Implantation." In The Custom-Made Child? Women-Centered Perspectives, edited by H. B. Holmes et al., pp. 259-262. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1981.
21.
———. "Personal Courage Is Not Enough: Some Hazards of Childbearing in the 1980s." In Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? edited by R. Arditti et al., pp. 331-355. Boston : Pandora Press, 1984.
22.
Mayrand, T. "Response." In The Custom-Made Child? Women-Centered Perspectives, edited by H. B. Holmes et al., pp. 249-251. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1981.
23.
Menning, B. "In Defense of In Vitro Fertilization." In The Custom-Made Child? Women-Centered Perspectives, edited by H. B. Holmes et al., pp. 263-267. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1981.
OntarioLaw Reform Commission. Report on Human Artificial Reproduction and Related Matters. 2 vols. Toronto, Ont., Canada: TorontoMinistry of the Attorney General, 1985.
26.
Overall, C. Ethics and Human Reproduction : A Feminist Analysis. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin, 1987.
27.
Pharis, M.E., and Manosevitz, M. "Sexual Stereotyping of Infants: Implications for Social Work Practice ." Social Work Research and Abstracts, 20 (1984), pp. 7-12.
28.
Powledge, R. "Unnatural Selection: On Choosing Children's Sex." In The Custom-Made Child? Women-Centered Perspectives, edited by H. B. Holmes et al., pp. 193-199. Clifton, NJ : Humana Press, 1981.
29.
Robertson, J. "Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy, and Childbirth." Virginia Law Review, 69 (April 1983), pp. 405-464.
30.
———. "Embryos, Families and Procreative Liberty." Southern California Law Review, 59 (July 1986), pp. 942-1041.
31.
Rose, H., and Hanmer, J. "Women's Liberation, Reproduction and the Technological Fix." In Sexual Divisions and Society: Process and Change, edited by D. Barker and S. Allen, pp. 199-223. London, England: Tavistock Publications, 1976.
32.
Rothman, R.K. "The Meanings of Choice in Reproductive Technology." In Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? edited by R. Arditti et al., pp. 23-33. Boston: Pandora Press, 1984.
33.
———. "The Products of Conception: The Social Context of Reproductive Choices ." Journal of Medical Ethics, 11 (1985), pp. 188-193.
34.
———. The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. New York: Viking/Penguin, 1986 .
35.
Rowland, R. "Reproductive Technologies: The Final Solution to the Woman Question ?" In Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? edited by R. Arditti et al., pp. 356-369. Boston : Pandora Press, 1984.
36.
———. "Motherhood, Patriarchal Power, Alienation and the Issue of 'Choice ' in Sex Preselection." In Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women, edited by G. Corea et al., pp. 74-87. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1987a.
37.
———. "Technology and Motherhood: Reproductive Choice Reconsidered." Signs, 12 (Spring 1987b), pp. 512-528.
38.
Saxton, M. "Born and Unborn: The Implications of Reproductive Technologies for People with Disabilities." In Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? edited by R. Arditti et al., pp. 298-312. Boston: Pandora Press, 1984.
39.
Singer, P., and Wells, P.The Reproductive Revolution: New Ways of Making Babies. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
40.
Steinbacher, R. "Sex Preselection: From Here to Fraternity." In Beyond Domination: New Perspectives on Women and Philosophy, edited by C. Gould.Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld, 1983.
41.
Steptoe, P.C., et al. "Clinical Aspects of Pregnancies Established with Cleaving Embryos Grown In Vitro." British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , 87 (September 1980), pp. 757-768.
42.
Wadlington, W. "Artificial Conception: The Challenge for Family Law." Virginia Law Review, 65 (April 1983), pp. 465-514.
43.
Walters, L. "Ethics and New Reproductive Technologies: An International Review of Committee Statements." Hastings Center Report, 17 (June 1987), Special Supp., pp. 3-9.
44.
Warnock Committee.Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Report to theDepartment of Health and Social Security . London, England: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1984.
