In an era of global movement of capital, information, and workers, various groups of migrant women experience systemic exclusion and marginalization in Canada. A demand for care workers for domestic services has resulted in a Live-in Caregiver Program. An increase of marketing Canadian education internationally has brought in burgeoning numbers of international students and their accompanying mothers. Despite pervasive discourses of these phenomena as “profit or asset” to nation building in both home and host countries, the cost of globalization has been picked up by women regardless of their socioeconomic class, and their marginalization is ingrained in our legislation.
AlaggiaR.ChauS.TsangA.K.T. (2001). Astronaut Asian families: Impact of migration on family structure from the perspective of the youth. Journal of Social Work Research, 2, 295–306.
2.
Arat-KocS. (1997). Immigration policies, migrant domestic workers, and the definition of citizenship in Canada. In Strong-BoagV.FellmanA. (Eds.), Rethinking Canada. The promise of women’s history (pp. 424–436). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
3.
BainesC.EvansP.NeysmithS. (1991). Women’s caring. Feminist perpectives in social welfare. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.
4.
BakanA. B.StasiulisD. K. (1995). Making the match: Domestic placement agencies and the racilaization of women’s household work. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 20, 303–335.
CoddJ. (2004). Export education and the commercialisation of public education in New Zealand. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 13, 21–41.
11.
ConnellR.FawcettB.MeagherG. (2009). Neoliberalism, new public management and the human service professions. Journal of Sociology, 45, 331–338.
12.
Council of Ministers of Education. (2011). Bringing education to the world, bringing the world to Canada. Ottawa, Canada: The Council of the Federation. Retrieved fromHttp://www.cmec.ca/pages/Default.aspx
EhrenreichB.HochschildA. (Ed.). (2003). Global women. Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
15.
FinemanM. (1995). The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
HarawayD. (2004). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In HardingS. (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader (pp. 81–102). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
JeongJ.BelangerD. (2011). Kirogifamilies as virtual “families:” Perspectives and experiences of Kirogi mothers. In NohS.KimA.NohM. (Eds.), Korean immigrants in Canada: Perspectives on migration, integration and the family (pp. 335–364). Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
18.
KimS. M. (2009). A qualitative study on the wild goose mother's everyday life, family relationship and social networking (in Korean). Journal of Korean Family Resources Management Association, 13(1), 41–59.
19.
KimY. H.ChoiM. S.LeeJ. H. (2005). Actual state of Korean ‘Geese Mothers’ in New Zealand (in Korean). Journal of Koran Home Economics Association, 43(11), 141–152.
20.
KnowlesV. (1997). Strangers at our gates: Canadian immigration and immigration policy, 1540-1997. Toronto, Canada: Dundurn Press.
21.
KwakM. (2008). Globalizing Canadian education from below: A case study of transnational immigrant entrepreneurship between Seoul, Korean and Vancouver, Canada (Doctor of Philosophy). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
22.
KwakM. H. D. (Ed.). (2007). Making the new economy: Immigrant entrepreneurs and emerging transnational networks of international education and tourism in Seoul and Vancouver. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
LeeE. (2010). Paradox of globalization and marginalization of Kirogi mothers in Canada. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of Global Studies, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
24.
LynchK. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5, 1–17.
25.
MacKinnonC. (2004). Feminism, marxism, method, and the state: Towards feminist jurisprudence. In HardingS. (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader (pp. 135–156). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
MacklinA. (1992). Foreign domestic worker: Surrogate housewife or mail order servant?McGill Law Journal/Revue de droit de McGill, 37, 681–781.
27.
MohantyC. (2006). “Under western eyes revisited:” Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. In MorganS. (Ed.), The feminist history reader (pp. 221–251). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
NeysmithS.Reitsma-StreetM. (2005). Provisioning: Conceptualizing the work of women for 21st century social policy. Women’s Studues International Forum, 28, 10.
29.
NeysmithS.Reitsma-StreetM.Baker CollinsS.PorterE. (2012). Beyond caring labour to provisioning work. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
30.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011). Education at a glance 2011 OECD indicators. Paris, France: Author.
31.
ParkK. (1997). The Korean American dream: Immigrants and small business in New York. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
ParkS.AbelmannN. (2004). Class and cosmopolitan striving:mother's management of English education in South Korea. Anthropological Quarterly, 77(4), 645–672.
33.
ParrenasR. (2008). The force of domesticity. Filipina migrants and globalizatuion. New York, NY: New York University Press.
34.
PrattG. (2005). Abandoned women and spaces of exception. Paper presented at the the2005AAG Antipode Lecture, Worcester, MA, USA.
35.
RalphD.RegimbaldA.St-AmandN. (Ed.). (1997). Open for business: Closed to people. Mike Harris’s Ontario. Halifax, England: Fernwood.
36.
RamosH. (2012). Do Canadians know how increasing numbers of temporary foreign workers is changing immigration?Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Retrieved fromhttp://www.policyalternatives.ca
37.
SassenS. (2003). Global cities and survival circuits. In EhrenreichB.HochschildA. (Eds.), Global women: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy (pp. 104–114). New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
38.
SilveraM. (1989). Silenced: Talks with working class West Indian women about their lives and struggles as domestic workers in Canada. Toronto, Canada: Sister Vision Press.
39.
SongJ. (2010). Language ideology and identity in transnational space: Globalization, migration, and bilingualismamong Korean families in the USA. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 19.
40.
SpenceC. (2009). Vision of hope seminar. Toronto, Canada.
41.
StasiulisD.BakanA. (2005). Negotiating citizenship: Migrant women in Canada and the global system. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto press.
42.
TrilokekarR. (2010). International education as soft power? The contributions and challenges of canadian foreign policy to the internationalization of higher education. High Education, 59, 131–147. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9240-y
43.
ValianiS. (2012). Rethinking unequal exchange: The global integration of nursing labour markets. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
WaringM. (1988). Counting for nothing. What men value and what women are worth. Cambridge, MA: Allen & Unwin.
46.
WatersJ. L. (Ed.). (2003). Satellite kids in Vancouver: Transnational migration, education and the experience of lone children. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
47.
Yuval-DavisN. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
