This article summarizes the findings of a larger study of factors that are associated with women's reoffending, particularly its link with substance abuse. Primary data were derived from semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 26 women who had been released from Christchurch Women's Prison, New Zealand, prior to 1999. These data were triangulated with interviews with informed experts and with secondary data from the participants' community probation records. The study found an association between substance abuse and women's reoffending, which varied according to the type and level of dependence on substances. The relationship among substance abuse, dependence, and victimization affected the women's entry into offending and ongoing recidivism. Desistance from substance abuse and offending was a process of relapse and recovery affected by different life stages.
Berman, H., Ford-Gilboe, M., & Campbell, J.C. (1998). Combining stories and numbers: A methodologic approach for a critical nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 21(1), 1-15.
2.
British Home Office. (2002). Working with women prisoners report. London: HMSO.
3.
Campbell, R., & Wasco, S.M. (2000). Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology , 28, 773-791.
4.
Carlen, P. (1988). Women, crime and poverty. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
5.
Carlen, P., & Worrall, A. (Eds.). (1987). Gender, crime and justice . Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
6.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Christensen, D.H., & Dahl, C.M. (1997). Rethinking research dichotomies. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 25, 269-286.
8.
Cosgrove, L., & McHugh, M. (2000). Speaking for ourselves: Feminist methods and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 815-838.
9.
Creswell, J.W., Fetters, M.D., & Ivankova, N.V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 7-18.
10.
Dallimore, E.J. (2000). A feminist response to issues of validity in research . Women's Studies in Communication, 23, 157-181.
11.
Department of Corrections. (2000). Prison census. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
12.
Department of Justice, New Zealand. (1989). Prison review, Te Ara Hou: The new way. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministerial Committee of Inquiry into the New Zealand Prisons System.
13.
Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14.
Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 23, 144-161.
15.
Government Accountability Office. (1999). Women in prison: Issues and challenges confronting U.S. correctional systems . Washington, DC: Author.
16.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
Hill, J., Bond, M.A., Mulvey, A., & Terenzio, M. (2000). Methodological issues and challenges for a feminist community psychology: An introduction to a special issue. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 759-773.
18.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Johnson, B.D., Taylor, A., Golub, A., & Eterno, J. (2002). How accurate are arrestees in reporting their criminal justice histories? Concordance and accuracy of self-reports compared to official records. New York: National Development and Research Institutes. Retrieved January 2, 2008, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/196657.pdf
20.
Johnson, H. (2004). Drugs and crime: A study of incarcerated female offenders (Research and Policy Series 63). Canberra: Australian Government, Australian Institute of Criminology.
21.
Karberg, J.C., & James, D.J. (2005, July). Special report: Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/sdatji02.txt
22.
Katz, R.S. (2000). Explaining girls' and women's crime and desistance in the context of their victimization experiences. Violence Against Women, 6, 633-660.
23.
Kroner, D.G., & Loza, W. (2001). Evidence for the efficacy of self-report in predicting nonviolent and violent criminal recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 168-177.
24.
Kubiak, S.P. (2004). The effects of PTSD on treatment adherence, drug relapse, and criminal recidivism in a sample of incarcerated men and women . Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 424-433.
25.
Laishes, J. (2002). The 2002 mental health strategy for women offenders . Ottawa: Correctional Services Canada.
26.
Larimer, M.E., Palmer, R.S., & Marlatt, G.A. (1999). Relapse prevention: An overview of Marlatt's cognitive-behavioral model. Alcohol Research and Health, 23, 151-160.
27.
Locher, B., & Prugl, E. (2001). Feminism and constructivism: Worlds apart or sharing the middle ground? International Studies Quarterly, 45, 111-129.
28.
Maden, A., Sinton, M., & Gunn, J. (1994). A criminological and psychiatric survey of women serving a prison sentence. British Journal of Criminology , 34, 172-191.
29.
Mann, S.A., & Kelley, L.R. (1997). Standing at the crossroads of modernist thought: Collins, Smith, and the new feminist epistemologies. Gender & Society, 11, 391-409.
30.
Marlatt, A., & Gordon, J. (1985). Relapse prevention. New York : Guilford.
31.
McClellan, D.S., Farabee, D., & Crouch, B.M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455-476.
32.
Moth, B., & Hudson, S. (1999). An investigation into the demographic and offence specific variables, need areas and security classification in incarcerated female offenders in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Corrections.
33.
Motiuk, M., Motiuk, L., & Bonta, J. (1992). A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 143-159.
34.
Oakley, A. (1999). People's ways of knowing: Gender and methodology . In S. Hood, B. Mayall, & S. Oliver (Eds.), Critical issues in social research: Power and prejudice (pp. 154-170). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
35.
Olesen, V. (2000). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the millennium. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 215-156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Sampson, R.L., & Laub, J.H. (1995). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Statistics New Zealand. (1996). New Zealand official yearbook. Wellington: Author.
39.
Statistics New Zealand. (1999). New Zealand official yearbook on the web. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://www.stats.govt.nz/products-and-services/adverts/nz-off-year-book-99.htm
40.
Taylor, A. (2004). Women's criminal re-offending: Contributing and protective factors. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
41.
Weeks, J., Thomas, G., & Graves, G. (2004). Substance abuse in corrections FAQS. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
42.
Whitney, L. (1992). Substance abuse: A survey of the treatment needs of prison inmates. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
43.
Widom, C.S., & Ames, A. (1994). Criminal consequences of childhood sexual victimization . Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, 303-318.
44.
Willis, K., & Rushforth, C. (2003). The female criminal: An overview of women's drug use and offending behaviour. Australian Institute of Criminology Trends and Issues (No. 264). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
45.
Zamble, G., & Quinsey, V.L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
