The U.S. eugenics movement, which sought to encourage the “wellborn” to have children and actively discourage and even prohibit the “unfit” from having children, became increasingly popular and influential during the Progressive Era, shaping public discourse, emerging social work practice approaches, and state and federal public policy. This article details the eugenics movement; examines why young women, particularly those who were poor, non-Anglo-Saxon, and living in urban areas, were targeted as the key to preventing the unfit from propagating; and explores the relationship between eugenics and early social workers, focusing particular attention on their work with young women.
Abramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and social reform: An arena of struggle . Social Work, 43, 512-526.
2.
Abrams, L.A., & Curran, L. (2000). Wayward girls and virtuous women: Social workers and female juvenile delinquency in the Progressive Era. Affilia , 15, 49-64.
3.
Addams, J. (1961). The subtle problem of charity. In R. E. Pumphrey & M. W. Pumphrey (Eds.), The heritage of American social work: Readings in its philosophical and institutional development (pp. 268-277). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1899)
4.
Addams, J. (1972). The spirit of youth and the city streets. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1909)
5.
Addams, J. (2002). A new conscience and an ancient evil. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1912)
6.
Alan Guttmacher Institute. (1995). Issues in brief: Teenage pregnancy and the welfare reform debate. New York: Author.
7.
Anderson, M.L., & Collins, P.H. (2004). Conceptualizing race, class, and gender. In M. L. Anderson & P. H. Collins (Eds.), Race, class, and gender: An anthology (pp. 75-98). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
Axinn, J.M., & Hirsch, A.E. (1993). Welfare and the “reform” of women . Families in Society, 74, 563-572.
9.
Berman-Rossi, T., & Miller, I. (1994). African-Americans and the settlements during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Social Work with Groups, 17, 77-95.
10.
Breckinridge, S.P., & Abbott, E. (1970). The delinquent child and the home. New York: Arno Press. (Original work published 1912)
11.
Brice, T.S. (2005). “Disease and delinquency know no color”: Syphilis and African American female delinquency. Affilia , 20, 300-315.
12.
Bruno, F.J. (1957). Trends in social work, 1874—1956: A history based on the proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Carlson, E.A. (2001). The unfit: A history of a bad idea. Cold Springs Harbor, NY: Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press.
14.
Chambers, C.A. (1986). Women in the creation of the profession of social work. Social Service Review, 60, 1-33.
15.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
16.
Davies, S.P. (1923). Social control of the feebleminded: A study of social programs and attitudes in relation to the problems of mental deficiency. Utica, NY: State Hospitals Press.
17.
Davies, S.P. (1959). The mentally retarded in society. New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1930)
18.
Davis, A.F. (1972). Introduction. In J. Addams, The spirit of youth and the city streets (pp. vii-xxx). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
19.
D'Emilio, J., & Freedman, E.B. (1988). Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
Dugdale, R.L. (1910). The Jukes: A study in crime, pauperism, disease, and heredity (4th ed.). New York : G. P. Putnam's Sons. (Original work published 1877)
21.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: Volume I: An introduction . New York: Vintage Books.
22.
Franklin, D.L. (1986). Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From moral certainty to rational inquiry in social work practice. Social Service Review, 60, 504-525.
23.
Furstenberg, F.F., Jr. (2003). Teenage childbearing as a public issue and private concern. American Review of Sociology, 29, 23-39.
24.
Geronimus, A.T. (2003). Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 881-893.
25.
Goddard, H.H. (1912). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeblemindedness. New York: Macmillan .
26.
Haller, M.H. (1963). Eugenics: Hereditarian attitudes in American thought . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
27.
Haynes, K.S., & Mickelson, J.S. (2003). Affecting change: Social workers in the political arena (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
Hollander, R. (1986). Mental retardation and American society: The era of hope. Social Service Review, 60, 395-420.
29.
Iglehart, A.P., & Becerra, R.M. (2000). Social services and the ethnic community. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
30.
Joslin, K. (2002). Introduction: Slum angels. In A new conscience and an ancient evil (pp. ix-xxxii). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
31.
Karger, H.J., & Stoesz, D. (2005). American social welfare policy: A pluralistic approach (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
Katz, J.N. (1992). Gay American history: Lesbians and gay men in the U.S.A. (Rev. ed.). New York: Meridian.
33.
Kelly, D.M. (1996). Stigma stories: Four discourses about teen mothers, welfare, and poverty. Youth & Society, 27, 421-449.
34.
Kennedy, A.C. (2006). Urban adolescent mothers exposed to community, family, and partner violence: Prevalence, outcomes, and welfare policy implications . American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 44-54.
35.
Kevles, D.J. (1985). In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
36.
Klosternam, E.M., & Stratton, D.C. (2006). Speaking truth to power: Jane Addams' values base for peacemaking. Affilia, 21, 158-168.
37.
Kunzel, R.G. (1993). Fallen women, problem girls: Unmarried mothers and the professionalization of social work, 1890—1945. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
Leonard, T.C. (2003). “More merciful and not less effective”: Eugenics and American economics in the Progressive Era. History of Political Economy, 35, 687-712.
39.
Leonard, T.C. (2005). Protecting family and race: The Progressive case for regulating women's work. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64, 757-791.
40.
Lubove, R. (1969). The professional altruist: The emergence of social work as a career, 1880—1930. New York: Atheneum Press.
41.
Luker, K. (1996). Dubious conceptions: The politics of teenage pregnancy . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Lundblad, K.S. (1995). Jane Addams and social reform: A role model for the 1990s. Social Work, 40, 661-669.
43.
Luttrell, W. (2003). Pregnant bodies, fertile minds: Gender, race, and the schooling of pregnant teens. New York: Routledge.
44.
Nathanson, C.A. (1991). Dangerous passage: The social control of sexuality in women's adolescence. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
45.
Netting, F.E., Kettner, P.M., & McMurtry, S.L. (2004). Social work macro practice (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
Odem, M.E. (1995). Delinquent daughters: Protecting and policing adolescent female sexuality in the United States, 1885—1920. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press .
47.
Pernick, M.S. (1997). Eugenics and public health in American history . American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1767-1772.
48.
Pickens, D.K. (1968). Eugenics and the Progressives. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
49.
Pisciotta, A.W. (1983). Race, sex, and rehabilitation: A study of differential treatment in the juvenile reformatory, 1825—1900. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 254-268.
50.
Pivar, D.J. (1973). Purity crusade: Sexual morality and social control , 1868—1900. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
51.
Pivar, D.J. (2002). Purity and hygiene: Women, prostitution, and the “American Plan,” 1900—1930. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, Inc.
52.
Platt, A. (1969). The child savers: The invention of delinquency . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Prettyman, S.S. (2005). “We ain't no dogs”: Teenage mothers (re)define themselves. In P. Bettis & N. G. Adams (Eds.), Geographies of girlhood: Identities in-between (pp. 155-173). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Pumroy, E., & Brockman, P. (1986). Biographical sketch of Amos W. Butler. In A guide to the manuscript collections of the Indiana Historical Society and Indiana State Library. Indianapolis: Indiana Historical Society. Retrieved May 18, 2006, from http://www.indianahistory.org/library/manuscripts/collection_guides/M0034.html
55.
Radford, J.P. (1991). Sterilization versus segregation: Control of the “feebleminded,” 1900—1938. Social Science & Medicine, 33, 449-458.
56.
Rafter, N.H. (1992). Claims-making and socio-cultural context in the first U.S. eugenics campaign. Social Problems, 39, 17-34.
57.
Richmond, M.E. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
58.
Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books.
59.
Schlossman, S., & Wallach, S. (1978). The crime of precocious sexuality: Female juvenile delinquency in the Progressive Era. Harvard Educational Review , 48, 65-94.
60.
Schoen, J. (2005). Choice and coercion: Birth control, sterilization, and abortion in public health and welfare. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
61.
Sidel, R. (1996). The enemy within: A commentary of the demonization of difference. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66, 490-495.
62.
Specht, H., & Courtney, M.E. (1994). Unfaithful angels: How social work has abandoned its mission. New York: Free Press.
63.
Thomas, S.L. (1998). Race, gender, and welfare reform: The antinatalist response. Journal of Black Studies, 28, 419-446.
64.
Tice, K.W. (1998). Tales of wayward girls and immoral women: Case records and the professionalization of social work. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
65.
Withorn, A. (1996). “Why do they hate me so much?” A history of welfare and its abandonment in the United States. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66, 496-509.
66.
Worthington, G.E., & Topping, R. (1925). Specialized courts dealing with sex delinquency: A study of the procedure in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia and New York (5th ed.). New York: Bureau of Social Hygiene.
