This article describes the marital and domestic violence experiences of poor women in South Carolina in the context of an orthodoxy of conservatism. Drawing on Bourdieu’s scholarship, the authors present a conceptual framework that is based on the concepts of habitus, orthodoxy, and heterodoxy. The interpretation of the qualitative and quantitative data connects the observed behavioral phenomena with the structural, cultural, and political factors that sustain them. The article ends with a discussion of the implications of the findings and the debate on marriage promotion
Alan Guttmacher Institute. (2005a). State policies in brief: Parental involvement in minors’ abortions. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/state_pregnancy_trends.pdf
2.
Alan Guttmacher Institute. (2005b). Major developments in 2005. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/index.html
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Sage.
6.
Bronstein, J., Swaminathan, S., & Klapow, J. (2004). Does regional variation in multiple measures of health status differ across income levels? (UKCPR Discussion Papers Series, 2004-04). Retrieved from http://www.ukcpr.org/Publications/DP2004-04.pdf
7.
Bush, G. W. (2002). Fact sheet: Compassionate conservatism. Retrieved from http://www.Whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/04/print/20020430.html
8.
Carl Vinson Institute of Government. (2002). Dismantling persistent poverty in the southeastern United States. Retrieved from http://www.cviog.uga.edu/poverty/final/report.pdf
9.
Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2003). Union formation in fragile families (Center for Research on Child Wellbeing Working Paper Series, 2001-06-FF). Retrieved from http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/WP01-06-FF-pub.pdf
10.
Cash, W. J. (1941). The mind of the South. New York: Knopf.
11.
Center for Reproductive Rights. (2005). Mandatory delays and biased information requirements. Retrieved from http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_fac_manddelay1.html
12.
Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
13.
Cooper, C. A., & Knotts, H. G. (2004). Defining Dixie: A state-level measure of the modern political South. Paper presented at the Citadel Symposium on Southern Politics, Charleston, SC.
14.
Criminal Domestic Violence Act A166 (2005). S.C. Acts, p 1834.
15.
Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1998). The private safety net: The role of charitable organizations in the lives of the poor. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 541-573.
16.
Fagan, P. F., & Johnson, K. A. (2002). Marriage: The safest place for women and children. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
17.
Farber, N., & Miller-Cribbs, J. (2002). Violence in the lives of rural, Southern and poor White women. (Working Paper Series 02-11). St. Louis, MO: Center for Social Development, Washington University.
18.
Findeis, J. (1995). Gender differences in human capital in rural America. In J. Beaulieu & D. Mulkey (Eds.), Investing in people: The human capital needs of rural America (pp. 183-211). Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
Findeis, J., & Jensen, L. (1998). Employment opportunities in rural areas: Implications for poverty in a changing policy environment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 1000-1007.
20.
Fram, M. S. (2004). Research for progressive change: Bourdieu and social work. Social Service Review, 78, 553-576.
21.
Frank, T. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
22.
Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. (1986). Single mothers and their children: A new American dilemma. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
23.
Gastil, R. D. (1975). Cultural regions of the United States. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
24.
Gormley, K. (2005, April 20). Judiciary Committee passes cockfighting bill, tables domestic violence bill. Retrieved from http://www.wistv.com/global/story.asp?s=3233130
25.
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2004). Status of women in South Carolina. Retrieved from http://www.iwpr.org/states/pdf/sc.PDF
26.
Jun, H. J., Subramanian, S. V., Gortmaker, S., & Kawachi, I. (2004). A multi-level analysis of women’s status and self-related health in the United States [Electronic version]. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 59, 172-180.
27.
Landry, D., Darroch, J., Singh, S., & Higgins, J. (2003). Factors associated with the content of sex education in U.S. public secondary schools. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35, 261-269.
28.
Legislator’s remark resurrects S.C. bill on domestic violence. (2005, May 2). Washington Times. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20050501-105521-9752r
29.
Lichter, D. T., Graefe, D. R., & Brown, J. B. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50(1) 60-86.
30.
Lopoo, L. M. (2005). An inquiry into fertility in the American South during the 1990s. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
31.
Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., & Munson, M. L. (2003, December 17). Births: Final data for 2002. National Vital Statistics Reports, 52(10).
32.
Mathematica Policy Research Inc. (2002). TANF Caseload Survey South Carolina Instrument, final version. Princeton, NJ: Author.
33.
Miller-Cribbs, J., Cagle, B., & Cummings, Z. (2005, February/March). Thinking about think tanks: Lessons from the conservative right. Paper presented at the annual program meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, New York.
34.
Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.
35.
National Abortion Rights Action League. (2004). State refusal clauses of abortion. Retrieved from http://www.naral.org/facts/state_exemptions.cfm
36.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003a). Mathematics highlights 2003. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003b). Reading highlights 2003. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
National Women’s Law Center. (2002). Making the grade on women’s health. Washington, DC: Author.
39.
National Women’s Law Center. (2004). Making the grade on women’s health: A national and state-by-state report card 2004. Retrieved from http://www.nwlc.org/details.cfm?id=1861§ion=health
40.
Neubeck, K., & Cazenave, N. (2001). Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America’s poor. New York: Routledge.
41.
Nisbett, R., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview.
42.
Parrot, S. (1998). Welfare recipients who find jobs: What do we know about their employment and earnings?Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
43.
Pew Research Center, Forum on Religion and Public Life. (2003a). Religion and politics: Contention and consensus.Growing number says Islam encourages violence among followers. Retrieved from http://peoplepress.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=189
44.
Pew Research Center, Forum on Religion and Public Life. (2003b, November 18). Religious beliefs underpin opposition to homosexuality: Republicans unified, Democrats split on gay marriage. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=197
45.
Protect Our Women in Every Relationship (POWER) Act, H.3143, South Carolina House of Representatives, 115 Sess. (2005).
46.
Rainwater, L., & Yancey. (1964). The Moynihan report and the politics of controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
Rector, R. (2001). State sanctions and time limits: Comment. In R. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 245-269). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
48.
Rector, R., & Hederman, R. J. (2004). Two Americas: One rich, one poor? Understanding income inequality in the United States. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
49.
Rice, T. W., McLean, W. P., & Larsen, A. J. (2002). Southern distinctiveness over time: 1972-2000. American Review of Politics, 23, 193-220.
50.
Rural Poverty Research Institute. (1999). Rural Americans and welfare reform: An overview assessment. Retrieved from http://www.rupri.org/pubs/archive/old/welfare/p99-3/index.html
51.
Saunders-Medlock, L. (2003). Getting away with murder: A report on domestic violence in South Carolina. Retrieved from http://www.sccadvasa.org/Needs%2520assessment%2520report%2520externaledit.pdf
52.
Sigle-Rushton, W., & McLanahan, S. (2003). For richer or poorer? Marriage as an anti-poverty strategy in the United States (Center for Research on Child Wellbeing Working Paper Series 2001-17). Retrieved from http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/WP01-17-FF-pub.pdf
53.
South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. (2004). 2004 fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.teenpregnancysc.org
54.
South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. (2005). 2005 fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.teenpregnancysc.org/pdf/2005_Fact_Sheet.pdf
55.
Southern Regional Initiative on Child Care. (2004). Information on selected federal/state action steps set forth by the Southern Regional Task Force on Child Care. Retrieved from http://www.kidsouth.org/pdf/pcc2004talkingpoints.pdf
56.
Stanton, Glen T. (1999). Setting a goal worth aiming for: Guiding South Carolina’s adolescents toward sexual health and dignity. Columbia, SC: Palmetto Family Council.
57.
Strauss, M., Hanby, S., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
58.
United Health Foundation. (2002). State health ranking—2002 edition: High school graduation. Retrieved from http://www.unitedhealthfoundation.org/shr2002/components/risks/HighSchoolGrad.html
59.
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (2004). Rural income, poverty, and welfare: Rural poverty. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/IncomePovertyWelfare/ruralpoverty
60.
Urban Institute. (2002). Fast facts: Worse case sanctions. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/900774_FastFact.pdf
