This study compiles final reports of 12 Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services demonstration grant projects to examine services for individuals with severe disabilities and patterns of emphasis across key stakeholders. The reports identified a total of 639 project purposes, activities, outcomes, and barriers. These components were analyzed using a social systems framework consisting of four levels: student and family, program, organizational, and community. Results showed a consistently greater emphasis on the program level and a lesser emphasis on other levels, particularly at the community level. This pattern differed from project purposes which showed a more equal balance across the levels. In conjunction with the nature of the barriers projects experienced, this pattern of emphasis suggests that collaboration, both within and external to the projects, remains a significant issue. Collaboration and person-centered planning strategies may assist in involving stakeholders at all levels.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336 (1990).
2.
Benz, M.R., Lindstrom, L.E., & Halpern, A.S. (1995). Mobilizing local communities to improve transition services. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 21-32.
3.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
4.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142, Sec. 89, Stat. 773 (1975).
5.
Forest, M., & Lusthaus, E. (1989). Promoting educational equality for all students: Circles and MAPS. In S. Stainback, W. Stainback, & M. Forest (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 43-57). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
Forest, M., & Pearpoint, J. (1993). Commonsense tools: MAPS and circles. In J. Pearpoint, M. Forest, & J. Snow (Eds.), The inclusion papers: Strategies to make inclusion work (pp. 40-51). Toronto, CA: Inclusion Press.
7.
Forest, M., Pearpoint, J., & Snow, J. (1993). Natural support systems: Families, friends, and circles. In J. Pearpoint, M. Forest, & J. Snow (Eds.), The inclusion papers: Strategies to make inclusion work (pp. 116-132). Toronto, CA: Inclusion Press.
8.
Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1990). Collaboration as a predictor for success in school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation , 1, 69-86.
9.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294-309.
10.
Furney, K.S., Hasazi, S.B., & DeStefano, L. (1997). Transition policies, practices, and promises: Lessons from three states. Exceptional Children, 63, 343-355.
11.
Gajar, A., Goodman, L., & McAfee, J. (1993). Secondary schools and beyond: Transition of individuals with mild disabilities. New York : Merrill.
12.
Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D.K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367-394.
13.
Glass, G.V., & Hopkins, K.D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14.
Hanley-Maxwell, C., Rusch, F.R., & Rappaport, J. (1989). A multi-level perspective on community employment programs for adults with mental retardation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 32, 266-280.
15.
Heal, L.W., Copher, H.I., DeStefano, L., & Rusch, F. (1989). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful placements of secondary students with mental handicaps into competitive employment. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 12, 167-177.
16.
Ianacone, R.N., & Kochhar, C.A. (1996). Great expectations: Perspectives on transition policy and practice in the context of social change. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 19, 177-200.
17.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-476, Sec. 101, 104 Stat. 1102 (1990).
18.
Janney, R.E., Snell, M.E., Beers, M.K., & Raynes, M. (1995). Integrating students with moderate and severe disabilities into general education classes. Exceptional Children , 61, 425-439.
19.
Mount, B. (1992). Personal futures planning: Promises and precautions . New York: Graphic Futures.
20.
Neubert, D., & Moon, S. (1993). Education reform. In P. Wehman (Ed.), The ADA mandate for social change (pp. 175-198). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
Nisbet, J., Covert, S., & Shuh, M. (1992). Family involvement in the transition from school to adult life. In F. R. Rusch, L. DeStefano, J. Chadsey-Rusch , L. A. Phelps, & E. Szymanski (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 407-424). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
22.
O'Brien, J. (1987). A guide to lifestyle planning. In B. Wilcox & T. Bellamy (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to the activities catalog . Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes .
23.
Pearpoint, J. (1990). From behind the piano: The building of Judith Snow's unique circle of friends. Toronto, CA: Inclusion Press.
24.
Putnam, J.W., Spiegel, A.N., & Bruininks, R.H. (1995). Future directions in education and inclusion of students with disabilities: A Delphi investigation. Exceptional Children, 61, 553-576.
25.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-569, H.R. 102-973, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. (1992).
Rubin, S.E., Garcia, J., Millard, R., & Wong, H. (1988). Preparing rehabilitation counselors to deal with ethical dilemmas: A major challenge for rehabilitation education. In S. E. Rubin & N. M. Rubin (Eds.), Contemporary challenges to the rehabilitation counseling profession (pp. 303-315). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
28.
Rusch, F.R., Kohler, P.D., & Hughes, C. (1992). An analysis of OSERS-sponsored secondary special education and transitional services. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 15, 121-143.
29.
Rusch, F.R., & Phelps, L.A. (1987). Secondary special education and transition from school to work: A national priority. Exceptional Children , 53, 487-492.
30.
Siegel, S., Matt, R., Greener, K., Meyer, G., Halloran, W., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1993). Career ladders for challenged youths in transition from school to adult life. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
31.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1991). A rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In J. W. Lloyd, N. N. Singh, and A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 225-239). Sycamore, IL:
32.
Stowitschek, J.J. (1992). Policy and planning in transition programs at the state agency. In F. R. Rusch, L. DeStefano, J. Chadsey-Rusch , L. A. Phelps, & E. Szymanski (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 519-536). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
33.
Turnbull, H.R. III, (1993). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (4th ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
34.
Wehman, P. (1993). Introduction. In P. Wehman (Ed.), The ADA mandate for social change (pp. xxi-xxviii). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
35.
West, J.F., & Idol, L. (1990). Collaborative consultation in the education of mildly handicapped and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 22-31.
36.
Ysseldyke, J.E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow M.L. (1992). Critical issues in special education (2nd ed.). Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
