This study examined the outcomes of 409 students with mental retardation or multiple disabilities from 177 school districts in a Great Lakes state. These students with intellectual disabilities were interviewed at exit and 1 year following graduation. The authors developed and tested three regression models—two to predict full-time employment and one to predict college enrollment after graduation. Although inclusion was a significant predictor of postsecondary education, career and technical education and work study programs did not reach significance as predictors of postschool employment. For these students, gender and minority issues contributed to most of the variance. These findings point to the need for more holistic career and technical education and work study models for these students.
BaerR.DavisoA.McMahan QueenR.FlexerR.W. (in press). Disproportionality in transition services: A descriptive study. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities.
2.
BaerR. M.FlexerR. W.BeckS.AmstutzN.HoffmanL.BrothersJ.. . . ZechmanD.. (2003). A collaborative followup study on transition service utilization and post-school outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 7–25.
3.
BaerR. M.FlexerR. W.DennisL. (2007). Examining the career paths and transition services of students with disabilities exiting high school. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 317–329.
4.
BenzM.DorenB.YovanoffP. (1998). Crossing the great divide: Predicting productive engagement for young women with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 3–16.
5.
DavisoA.McMahan QueenR.BaerR. (2010). The Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study: Annual report to the state. Kent, OH: Kent State University, Center for Innovation in Transition and Employment.
6.
DorenB.BenzM. (2001). Gender equity issues in the vocational and transition services and employment outcomes experienced by young women with disabilities. In RoussoH.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Double jeopardy addressing gender equity in special education (pp. 289–312). Albany: State University of New York.
7.
FlexerR. W.DavisoA.BaerR. M.McMahan QueenR.MeindlR. (in press). An epidemiological model of transition and postschool outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals.
8.
FultonS.SabornieE. (1994). Evidence of employment inequality among females with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 28, 149–165.
9.
GreeneG. (2003). Transition pathways. In GreeneG.Kochhar-BryantC. A. (Eds.), Pathways to successful transition for youth with disabilities (pp. 198–230). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
10.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, H.R. 1350. Retrieved from http://Thomas.gov
11.
KleinbaumD. G.SullivanK. M.BarkerN.D. (2007). A pocket guide to epidemiology. New York, NY: Springer.
12.
LevineP.EdgarE. (1994). Respondent agreement in followup studies of graduates of special and regular education programs. Exceptional Children, 60, 334–343.
13.
LindstromE. L.BenzM. R.DorenB. (2004). Career choices: Expanding options for young women with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 43–63.
14.
LosenD. J.OrfieldG. (Eds.). (2002). Racial inequality in special education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
15.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf
16.
TestD. W.MazzottiV.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
17.
ThompsonB.DiamondK. E.McWilliamR.SnyderP.SnyderS.W. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71, 181–194.
WagnerM.BlackorbyJ. (1996). Transition from high school to work or college: How special education students fare. The Future of Children: Special Education for Students With Disabilities, 6, 103–110.
20.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2005). Changes over time in the early post-school outcomes of youth with disabilities. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_06/nlts2_report_2005_06_complete.pdf
21.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (2003). Going to school: Instructional contexts, programs, and participation of secondary school students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_12/nlts2_report_2003_12_complete.pdf
