Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current U.S. federal mandate for educational accountability requires state departments of education to collect data on the postschool employment and postsecondary school and/or training enrollment of young adults with disabilities. To examine how these data have been collected, we conducted a literature synthesis of follow-up and follow-along studies to answer four critical questions: (a) What data collection methods were used? (b) What were the sample characteristics? (c) What variables were examined? (d) What postschool outcomes were identified? We report the answers to these questions, discuss the limitations of our synthesis, outline implications for stakeholders, and make recommendations for state researchers collecting postschool outcomes data and for education professionals using these data to improve secondary transition programs for students with disabilities.

Keywords

post-school outcomes transition research methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blackorby, J. , & Wagner, M. ( 1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children,62, (5), 399-413.

Chambers , D., Rabren, K. , & Dunn, C. (2009). A comparison of transition from high school to adult life of student with and without disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 42-52.

Cooper, H.M. ( 1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.

Czaja, R. , & Blair, J. ( 2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures . Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge .

Dillman, D.A. ( 2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Willey.

Edgar, E. , & Levine, P. ( 1987, December). A longitudinal study of graduates of special education. Keynote presentation. Paper presented at the Project Directors’ Annual Meeting. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED303004).

Halpern, A.S. ( 1985). Transition: A look at the foundations. Exceptional Children, 51, 479-486.

Halpern, A.S. ( 1990). A methodological review of follow-up and follow-along studies tracking school leavers from special education. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 13(1), 13-27.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.

10.

Lindstrom, L.E. , Doren, B. , Metheny, J. , Johnson, P. , & Zane, C. ( 2007). Transition to employment: role of the family in career development. Exceptional Children, 73, 348-366.

11.

Mithaug, D.E. , Horiuchi, C.N. & Fanning, P.N. ( 1985). A report on the Colorado statewide follow-up survey of Special Education students. Exceptional Children, 51, (5) 397-404.

12.

Newman, L. , Wagner, M. , Cameto, R. , & Knokey, A.M. ( 2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf

13.

Office of Special Education Programs. (2009 , August). Part b state performance plan/annual performance report 2008 indicator analyses for FFY 2007-08. Paper presented at the Office of Special Education Programs Leadership Conference , Washington, DC.

14.

Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Grant Program. (n.d.). Retrieved February 12, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/slds

15.

Sitlington, P.L. , & Frank, A.R. ( 1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life? Learning Disability Quarterly , 13, 97-111.

16.

Test, D.W. , Mazzotti, V.L. , Mustian, A.L. , Fowler, C.H. , Kortering, L. , & Kohler, P. ( 2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160-181.

17.

Will, M. ( 1984). OSER program for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges from school to working life. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation.

Methods for Collecting Postschool Outcomes Data on Young Adults With Disabilities: A Literature Synthesis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References