IDEA 2004 has included a new requirement for youth transition— a Summary of Functional Performance (SOP)—documentation to assist in seeking eligibility for disability-related services after high school. However, minimal implementation guidance has been provided to states. The articles in this special series explain how the SOP can reduce longstanding barriers to transition and explore its implementation from perspectives of secondary, postsecondary, rehabilitation, employment, students, and families. In this article, the authors describe the work of the National Transition Documentation Summit in prompting a national dialog, responding to thorny questions from the field, and developing guidelines for field consideration. Finally, it presents a charge to the field to collaborate and continue conversation about bridging the documentation gap to strengthen the likelihood of successful transition for youth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, H., & Jones, M. (2000). Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income for undergraduates with disabilities: An analysis of the National Postsecondary Student Aid Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Educational Sciences .
2.
Black, R.S., Smith, G., Chang, C., Harding, T., & Stodden, R. (2002). Provision of educational supports to students with disabilities in two-year postsecondary programs. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 24 (2/3), 3—17.
3.
Brinckerhoff, L.C., McGuire, J.M., & Shaw, S.F. (2002). Postsecondary education and transition for college students with learning disabilities. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
4.
Burgstahler, S., Crawford, L., & Acosta, J. (2001). Transition from two-year to four-year institutions for students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly , 21(1). Retrieved July 3, 2005, from http://www.cds.hawaii.edu/dsq/_articles_html/2001/Winter/dsq_2001_Winter_05.html
5.
Gajar, A. (1998). Postsecondary education. In F. Rusch & J. Chadsey (Eds.), Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 383—405). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
6.
Gaylord, V., Johnson, D. R., Lehr, C. A., Bremer, C. D., & Hazasi, S. (Eds.). (2004). Achieving secondary education and transition results for students with disabilities. Impact, 16(3). (Available from the University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration)
7.
Getzel, E.D., & Briel, L. (2006). Pursuing postsecondary education opportunities for individuals with disabilities. In P. Wehman (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 11—111). Baltimore: Brookes.
8.
Gilmore, D.S., Bose, J., & Hart, D. (2002). Postsecondary education as a critical step toward meaningful employment: Vocational rehabilitation's role. Job Training & Placement Report, 26(3), 1—3.
9.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)(reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1990)
10.
Kaye, H.S. (2000). Computer and Internet use among people with disabilities. Disability Statistics Report (No. 13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
11.
Martin, J. (2002). The transition of students with disabilities from high school to postsecondary education. In C. A. Kochhar-Bryant & D. S. Bassett (Eds.), Aligning transition and standards-based education: Issues and strategies (pp. 167—186). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
12.
Martin, J. (2005). Comments on the SOP template. Norman, OK: The University of Oklahoma, Zarrow Center for Learning Enrichment.
13.
National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 1999). National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS) composite test scores, and SAT/ACT scores. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. (2000). Technical report: Postsecondary education and employment for students with disabilities: Focus group discussions on supports and barriers to lifelong learning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
15.
National Council on Disability. (2003a). People with disabilities and postsecondary education. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
National Council on Disability. (2003b). Youth Advisory Committee proceedings: Record of personal meeting (Teleconference, January 24, 2003).
17.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
18.
Roessler, R.T., & Rumrill, P.D., Jr. (1998). Reducing workplace barriers to enhance job satisfaction: An important postemployment service for employees with chronic illnesses. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation , 10, 219—229.
19.
Sharpe, M., & Johnson, D.R. (2001). A 20/20 analysis of postsecondary support characteristics . Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16(3/4), 169—177.
20.
Shaw, S., Kochhar-Bryant, C., Izzo, M., Benedict, K., & Parker, D. (2005). Summary of performance under IDEA 2004. National Documentation Summit.
21.
Stodden, R.A., Conway, M.A., & Chang, K. (2003). Professional employment for individuals with disabilities . Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Center on Disability Studies.
22.
Stodden, R.A., Galloway, L.M., & Stodden, N.J. (2003). Secondary school curricula issues: Impact on postsecondary students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70(1), 9—25.
23.
Stodden, R.A., Jones, M.A., & Chang, K. (2002). Services, supports and accommodations for individuals with disabilities: An analysis across secondary education, postsecondary education and employment. Honolulu: University of Hawaii-Manoa, Center on Disability Studies. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://www.rrtc.hawaii.edu/capacity/papers/StoddenJones_formatted.htm
24.
Storms, J., O'Leary, E., & Williams, J. (2000). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997 transition requirements: A guide for states, districts, schools, universities and families. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Transition Network Institute on Community Integration (UAP).
25.
Test, D., Mason, C., Hughes, C., Konrad, M., Neale, M., & Wood, W. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 391—412.
26.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Study of state and local implementation and impact of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Highlights from the 1999—2000 school year—Year 1 data collection. Bethesda, MD: ABT Associates.
27.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2003 ). Federal actions can assist state in improving postsecondary outcomes for youth (GAO-03-773). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
28.
U.S. Office of Civil Rights. (2002). Students with disabilities preparing for postsecondary education: Know your rights and responsibilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
29.
Vreeburg Izzo, M., Hertzfeld, J., Simmons-Reed, E., & Aaron, J. (2001). Promising practices: Improving the quality of higher education for students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(1).
30.
Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Newman, L. (2003). Youth with disabilities: A changing population . Menlo Park, CA: SRI International .
31.
Wehmeyer, M., Field, S., Doren, B., Jones, B., & Mason, C. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in standards-based reform. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 413—425.
32.
Whelley, T., Hart, D., & Zafft, C. (2002). Coordination and management of services and supports for individuals with disabilities from secondary to postsecondary education and employment. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Center for Research on Post-Secondary Education.
