In this study, the researchers analyzed the transition components of 399 Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). In many cases, transition goal areas mandated by the 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) either were not addressed or were inadequately detailed. Effective practices, such as career planning and self-determination enhancement, were not incorporated within most plans, and the study indicated that students frequently were solely responsible for carrying out action steps to achieve their transition goals. Race and gender were not significant determinants of plan quality; however, disability type, projected diploma type, and district residence were associated with variations in transition planning activities. The authors discuss the implications of the findings relative to enhancing student preparation for adult life as envisioned by the 2004 reauthorization of IDEA.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agran, M., Cain, H.M., & Cavin, M.D. (2002). Enhancing the involvement of rehabilitation counselors in the transition process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 141—155.
2.
Benz, M.R., Lindstrom, L., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509—529.
3.
Benz, M.R., Yovanoff, P., & Doren, B. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 151—165.
4.
Defur, S., Getzel, E.E., & Kregel, J. (1994). Individual transition plans: A work in progress . Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 4, 139—145.
5.
Doren, B., & Benz, M. (2001). Gender equity issues in the vocational and transition services and employment outcomes experienced by young women with disabilities . In H. Rousso & M. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Double jeopardy: Addressing gender issues in special education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6.
Educational Equity Concepts. (1993). A report on women with disabilities in postsecondary education (Issue Paper No. 1). New York: Author.
7.
Everson, J.M., Zhang, D., & Guillory, J.D. (2001). A statewide investigation of individualized transition plans in Louisiana. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 37—49.
8.
Froschl, M., Rubin, E., & Sprung, B. (1999). Connecting gender and disability. Newton, MA: Women's Educational Equity Act (WEEA) Equity Resource Center, Education Development Center.
9.
Geenen, S., Powers, L.E., Lopez-Vasquez, A., & Bersani, H. (2003). Understanding and supporting the transition of minority youth. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals , 26, 27—46.
10.
Grigal, M., Neubert, D.A., Moon, M.S., & Graham, S. (2003). Self-determination for students with disabilities: Views of parents and teachers. Exceptional Children, 70, 97—112.
11.
Grigal, M., Test, D.W., Beattie, J., & Wood, W.M. (1997). An evaluation of transition components of Individualized Education Programs. Exceptional Children, 63, 357—372.
12.
Hanley-Maxwell, C. (1999). Transition from school-to-adult life. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 109—130). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
13.
Hasazi, S.B., Furney, K.S., & DeStefano, L. (1999). Implementing the IDEA transition mandates. Exceptional Children, 65, 555—566.
14.
Huer, M.B. (1990). Special facilities and services for university student with mobility impairment: A demographic study (U.S.A.). Assistive Technology, 2(4), 125—130.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)(amended 1997)
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. (reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
17.
Johnson, D.R., Stodden, R.A., Emanuel, E.J., Luecking, R., & Mack, M. (2002). Current challenges facing secondary education and transition services: What research tells us. Exceptional Children, 68, 519—531.
18.
Mank, D. (1994). The underachievement of supported employment: A call for reinvestment. Journal of Disability Policy Studies , 5(2), 1—24.
19.
Martin, J.E., Mithaug, D.E., Cox, P., Peterson, L.Y., Van Dycke, J.L., & Cash, M.E. (2003). Increasing self-determination: Teaching students to plan, work, evaluate, and adjust. Exceptional Children , 69, 431—448.
20.
Morningstar, M.E., Turnbull, A.P., & Turnbull, H.R. (1995). What do students with disabilities tell us about the importance of family involvement in the transition from school to adult life? Exceptional Children, 62, 249—260.
21.
Powers, L.E., Sowers, J., & Stevens, T. (1995). An exploratory, randomized study of the impact of mentoring on the self-efficacy and community-based knowledge of adolescents with severe physical challenges. Journal of Rehabilitation , 61(1), 33—41.
22.
Powers, L.E., Turner, A., Matuszewski, J., Wilson, R., & Loesch, C. (1999). A qualitative analysis of student involvement in transition planning. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 21(3), 18—26.
23.
Powers, L.E., Turner, A., Westwood, D., Matuszewski, J., Wilson, R., & Phillips, A. (2001). Take Charge for the Future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24(1), 89—104.
24.
Sands, D.J., Bassett, D.S., Lehmann, J., & Spencer, K.C. (1998). Factors contributing to and implications for student involvement in transition-related planning, decision making, an instruction . In M. L. Wehmeyer & D. J. Sands (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in education planning, decision making and instruction (pp. 25—44). Baltimore: Brookes .
25.
Shearin, A., Roessler, R., & Schriner, K. (1999). Evaluating the transition component in IEPs of secondary students with disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(2), 22—35.
26.
Thoma, C.A., Baker, S.R., & Saddler, S.J. (2002). Self-determination in teacher education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 82—89.
27.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (1996). Census of population and housing, 1 [United States]: Public use microdata sample: 5-percent sample [Computer file release]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor])
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2001). State and local implementation of IDEA. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (1994). National agenda for achieving better results for children and youth with serious emotional disturbance. Washington, DC: Chesapeake Institute.
31.
Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Newman, L. (2003). Youth with disabilities: A changing population (Report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study [NLTS] and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
32.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities . Exceptional Children, 63, 245—255.
