Exit Plans for Students with Disabilities Attending Separate Approved Special Education Programs in the Private Sector

Abstract

The exit plans of 1,632 students from 15 states attending 92 approved, out-of-district special education programs in the private sector were studied, via a survey instrument, including programs for medical disorders, pervasive developmental and/or communication disorders, and emotional and behavioral disorders. Results indicate that students from programs for medical and pervasive developmental/ communication disorders were likely to plan transfers to self-contained programs within their districts, whereas students from emotional/behavioral disorders programs tended to plan transfers to other approved, private programs outside their districts. Among the graduates/aged-out students, those leaving medical and emotional/behavioral disorders programs were likely to plan pursuit of mainstream postschool activities, whereas those from pervasive developmental/communication disorders programs tended to make postschool plans to enter vocational rehabilitation programs. Follow-up studies are needed to determine the degree to which these plans were actually carried out over time.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benz, M.R. , Lindstrom, L. , & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509-529.

Blackorby, J. , & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399-413.

Browning, P. , Dunn, C. , Rabren, K. , & Wetstone, M. (1995). Post-school outcomes for students with disabilities: A U.S. synopsis. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation , 10, 31-37.

Chambers, J.G. , Parrish, T.B. , & Harr, J.J. (2002). What are we spending on Special Education Services in the United States, 1999-2000? (Contract No. ED99CO 0091). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.

Halpern, A.S. (1993). Quality of life as a conceptual framework for evaluating transition outcomes. Exceptional Children, 59, 486-498.

Halpern, A.S. (1994). The transition of youth with disabilities to adult life: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition Council for Exceptional Children. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 115-124.

Heal, L.W. , & Rusch, F.R. (1995). Predicting employment for students who leave special education high school programs. Exceptional Children, 61, 472-487.

Johnson, D.R. , McGrew, K.S. , Bloomberg, L. , Bruininks, R.H. , & Lin, H.C. (1997). Results of a national follow-up study of young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation , 25, 119-133.

Johnson, J.R. , & Rusch, F.R. (1993). Secondary special education and transition Services . Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 1-18.

10.

Lindstrom, L.E. , & Benz, M.R. (2002). Phases of career development: Case studies of young women with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children , 69, 67-83.

11.

Malmgren, K. , Edgar, E. , & Neel, R.S. (1998). Postschool status of youths with behavioral disorders . Behavioral Disorders, 23, 257-263.

12.

National Center on Educational Outcomes. ( 1993). Educational outcomes and indicators for students completing school. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Author.

13.

Sample, P. (1998). Postschool outcomes for students with significant emotional disturbance following best-practice transition services. Behavioral Disorders, 23, 231-242.

14.

Schmidt-Davis, H. , Hayward, B.J. , & Kay, Jr., H.B. (2000). Basic skills and labor market success: Findings from the vocational rehabilitation longitudinal study . American Rehabilitation, 25, 11-23.

15.

SRI International. (1993). The National Longitudinal Transition Study: A summary of findings (Contract No. 300-87-0054). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.

16.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (1999). Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

17.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

18.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2001). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

19.

U.S. Department of Education (2002). President's Commission of Excellence in Special Education report: A new era: Reuitalizing special education for children and their families . Washington, DC: Author.

20.

Wagner, M.M. (1995). Outcomes for youths with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood. The Future of Children , 5, 90-112.

21.

Wagner, M. , Blackorby, J. , Cameto, R. , & Newman, L. (1993). What makes a difference? Influences on postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The third comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.