The Impact of Person Centered Planning on the Content and Organization of Individual Supports

Abstract

Person Centered Planning (PCP) is an approach to designing support that is guided by the individual with disabilities (or his/her advocates) that receives support, builds from personal strengths and vision, and results in practical action plans. While PCP procedures have been advocated strongly and adopted widely, there is little empirical documentation of the impact of the approach on the quality of resulting plans or the perceived impact of support on the lives of people with disabilities. The present study provides an analysis of the impact that the use of PCP had with ten transition-age students receiving special education services. Interviews with eight educators and ten students/parents indicated that PCP training was associated with (a) increased use of PCP procedures, (b) increased number of written goals supported outside the school-time, (c) increased number of non-paid individuals scheduled to provide support, and (d) higher satisfaction with the planning process by educators and students/parents.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Everson, J.M. (1996). Using person centered planning concepts to enhance school-to-adult life transition planning. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 6, 7-13.

Flannery, K.B. , & Slovic, R. (1999). Person centered assessment and planning: New tools for new audiences and new environments. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Hagner, D. , Helm, D.T. , & Butterworth, J. (1996). "This is your meeting": A qualitative study of person-centered planning. Mental Retardation , 34(3), 159-171.

Holburn, S. , & Vietze, P. (1998). Has person-centered planning become the alchemy of developmental disabilities? A response to O'Brien, O'Brien, and Mount." Mental Retardation, 36(6), 485-488.

Miner, C.A. , & Bates, P.E. (1997). The effect of PCP activities on the IEP/transition planning process. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, (32), 105-112.

Mount, B. , & Zwernick, K. (1998). It's never too early: It's never too late. St. Paul, MN: Metropolitan Council.

O'Brien, J. (1987). A guide to lifestyle planning: Using the Activities Catalog to integrate services and natural support systems. In Wilcox, B. and Bellamy, T. (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to the activities catalog . Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks .

O'Brien, C.L. , O'Brien, J. , & Mount, B. (1997). Person-centered planning has arrived...or has it? Mental Retardation, 35(6), 480-484.

Reid, D.H. , Everson, J.M. , & Green, C.W. (1999) A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(4), 467-477.

10.

Roberts, G. , Becker, H. , & Seay, P. (1997). A process for measuring adoption of innovation within the supports paradigm. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22,109-119.

11.

Vandercook, T. , York, J. , & Forest, M. (1989). The McGill Action Planning System (MAPS): A strategy for building the vision. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 202-215.

12.

Wehmeyer, M.L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 53-61.

13.

Whitney-Thomas, J. , Shaw, D. , Honey, K. , & Butterworth, J. (1998). Building a future: A study of student participating in person-centered planning. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 119-133.